I wish!
But since that can’t be done now, not welcoming more BS pouring in is the next best option.
I wish!
But since that can’t be done now, not welcoming more BS pouring in is the next best option.
That was wiki though, already know you’re gonna give me shit. But it’s still evidence
Wikipedia?
Here is Russian Wikipedia translated for you:

There’s always Hell Let Loose, because the customization in load outs that Enlisted offers makes it more fun to have all those random weapons and vehicles.
If we are sending each other to different games, I could always recommend CoD Vanguard/BFV for ultimate “fun”.
But those aren’t historically authentic
Do you see Enlisted where Chinese dudes are running around Berlin with Silenced PPSh which never even existed or where Su-9 1946 flies over Stalingrad as “historically authentic”?
Stalingrad shouldn’t be BR5 and that squad shouldn’t be Chinese.
The devs priorities have been like this for a long time. Custom match improvements and possible historical PVE would be the most realistic way to keep authenticity
I assume there were some chinese immigrants in russia fighting in the war
If you assume that, you probably have some info about ethnic Chinese regiments within the Red Army, speaking Chinese?
Because I surely have never heard about such miracles.
Let’s assume that’s true. Just because something wasn’t brought to the front lines doesn’t mean it wasn’t stationed and “used” in a battle. If it’s also true they were in manchuria during the war i think that’s good enough
There is exactly 0 evidence suggesting a single T-44 saw even 1 second of WW2 combat.
Why would infantry and armor be related? Im a soviet main and I genuinely dont care at all about the body armor debate at all, because I expect by ~90+% winrate to decline like 1% point. Its all cope.
Body armor discussion is a skill issue krutch as far as im aware, it only matters in low BR engagements due to lower DPS. At 1000rpm in BR5 people are comparing one shot statistics ![]()
But soviet body armor here is “different” ![]()
I genuinely want Jagdtiger to be in game, and would expect it to be the strongest vehicle (situationally).
Soviets simply want more faster firing BR5 vehicles. ISU-122, IS-100, T-44-100 etc. Anything that lobs faster than 17 seconds is aok, to be frank.
T-54 obr45 is simply the top engineering of 1945 to be honest. Definitely had a bigger impact on the world than IS3, which came and went.
Well it’s definitely not a “skill issue crutch”, at lower BRs the body armor is way too noticeable and at higher BRs it’s still gonna win you gunfights that you otherwise would have lost. Personally I don’t want body armor removed, just reworked.
As for the T-44-100, I just think it’s a bad addition right now, not a bad addition for the rest of time. I do think that it would be better than the King Tiger, but if Germany got the Jagdtiger then that could make up for it. But more than anything I think there needs to be other changes first, like a score requirement vehicle system and BR5 decompression.
fair points.
I think heavy tanks should be separate as attackers, fighters. It would give TDs space to play more.
Lets see what they cook up.
“What they cook up”, probably nothing let’s be honest. I’d be fine with the IS-100, ISUs, and a T-44-85, but with the current vehicle system a T-44-100 would be a bit broken.
And while body armor is being discussed, here’s my rework idea:
That’s just a basic idea though
All for asymmetric buffs that make nations feel different. One reason I dont want body armor removed is simply more same old.
Give Japan more gun shields, panzer chocolate
etc etc
Fuck yeah
They could also make it so Japanese MG nests don’t overheat, partly because they’re already the worst in the game and mostly because they have massive cooling fins that should prevent them from overheating.
They could give the US the Bangalore for breaking stuff while also being able to be thrown a short range.
The point is they can be creative with how they balance body armor, because they clearly don’t wanna remove it