There should never be a tank in Enlisted that’s better than the King Tiger. Maybe the Jagdtiger but even that’s debatable.
1 Like
I hope to see it soon. But now we need German attack aircraft more than ever.
There are definetly layers/tiers to how much any piece of equipment deserves to be in the game.
Used and produced gear is obviously at the top, with less common gear going lower and lower until we hit prototypes.
But, prototypes are definetly not equal to each other, either. Allow me some examples:
-
T-44 - Entered mass-production before the war ended, was just never fielded in combat. Lets give this a score of 10/10, the least prototype ‘prototype’.
-
Cönders MG - Single physical prototype made, unclear if it ever workeded. Score: 1/10,
-
PPSh-41 (S) - Only a single undated black and white photo exists, source remains unknown too, no proof that it existed during WW2. 0/10
-
Patchett Machine Carbine Mk I - Went through army field trials, at least one example is known to have seen combat during WW2, theories exist that examples might have been present at the Battle of Arnhem, formally accepted as the winner of the SMG trial in late-1944/early-1945 (just never entered production due to surpluss stocks of Sten guns during the war, nor even after the war as they expected the adoption of a Assault Rifle in the near-future). Winning a weapons trial means technicly no longer being a prototype. Score: 9/10
Unless your argument is balance, then I don’t think the E-75 should be considered any time soon.
Panther II, though… That has one score higher… Not much, but something.
3 Likes
Devs explicitly stated that this was supposed to be an exeption and not the new standard.
2 Likes
The argument is this:
Just because Germany is a strong faction doesn’t mean it should put up with more Soviet prototypes. Simply to please their community of players
That’s simply not good enough of a reason to deny the Soviets legitimate gear produced during the war…
1 Like
He didn’t see combat, and that’s a valid and solid argument for rejecting this addition. The IS-2 is there; if it has a slow reload, that’s their problem. But to introduce prototypes and throw them in the face of the…The German faction is not fair,If we include Panzerfaust 250, Maus, E-75, etc., then it will be fair, right?The Soviets simply must bear the consequences of the prototypes they are demanding, and there should be no collateral damage.Just to seek profit They already have a 46-inch fighter and a 48-inch RPD, which are badly off. Now to ask for something that was made but not used, yet was built during the conflict It’s not valid because Germany needs that too.In order to be on equal footing with Prototypes
Regardless of the argument used, its inclusion should not be an option, neither as a TT, Event, nor Premium; its mere existence in the game should be unacceptable.
Depends on which Panther II one is referring to, in the worse case scenario it scores even lower than the E-75.
It’s not justification to give Germany some random napkinwaffe to buff the areas that they already are supreme in either.
1 Like
Yes.
Su-9 (1946) is completely post war, designed on the basis of captured German Jumo 004 jet engine.
1 Like
Oh no, it would be a real shame if they removed the worst jet in the game, that would be tragic. (Remove it who cares)
I endorse this message.
Just please stop spreading misinformation presenting it as facts.
Both of these statements are false.
Shhhh, spreading misinformation is funny.
But I would like to see the T-44 added, it’s the least prototype prototype vehicle so it wouldn’t really feel out of place. The T-44-100 on the other hand has no place in the game right now and people need to understand that.
As for a high tier Soviet fighter, a Yak-9UT would be fun, especially with 45mm APHE.
Just like the Soviets with submachine guns and the Allies with aircraft like the Meteor and P-80. But if it’s with Germany, then there’s a problem, right?
None are valid, they did not see combat, there are no reports of their use in combat, they suffered no casualties nor inflicted casualties.They didn’t win/They lost battles, etc.Its inclusion must be prohibited or it should not arrive as a TT, Event or Premium; its existence should not be in the game