BR-412D is a postwar round. APHEBC BR-412B would be perfectly adequate IMO.
1 Like
None of that then!
We already have some postwar stuff, Su-9 for example.
1 Like
The Su-9 was designed during the war, the BR-412D was designed post war.
Well, guess we can have a better suggestion.
T-54 tank was also designed during WW2
1 Like
im 50/50 on this, the br rebalance should however happen, with 1943 is2 going to 4 and su 100 going to 4
along with is-3and is-4
to be honest i think the best way for them to do it is to just add full papershit, maus, is3 etc
they have driven themselves into very strict frame
just slap slop on, it’s already borken
Why do you keep spreading misinformation?
As for the suggestion – No.
No. Never saw combat in WW2.
Hell no. Ultra-rare prototype, not even adopted to mass production.
Absolutely not. Post-war round.
This is Enlisted - wtf has historical accuracy got to do with it??
3 Likes
Yes, yes and yes!!! Т-44 on 4BR in TT and T-44-100 on 5 BR in TT
1 Like
You sure you got the right Su-9? Also I’d be fine if they removed it from the game.
Enlisted is kinda a WW2 game so if something is post WW2 it shouldn’t be added but prototypes I’m fine with, just I prefer if they’re event and bp only
Let’s use our brains here, the T-54 would be broken. The Su-9 could be removed tomorrow and it really wouldn’t make a difference.
Yeah but not you I was replying too… 
Only if the E-75 comes with it, should the Soviet Prototype Tank fight the German Prototype Tank to be fair.
I thought BR-412D was a postwar shell, but I could be wrong.
The E-75 is napkinwaffe, not comparable with a physical prototype.
Neither of them fought in WWII, so if one is added, the other should be too, to be fair.