ADD T-44-100 with br-412d into soviet br5

Suggestions Vehicles
1

image
after this update soviet have to use br471b with maxium 205mm Penetration(20s reload) to fight Ferdinand and maybe Type 5 Ho-Ri,they both have more than 210mm(Equivalent Armour），that means its impossible for is2 to penetrate them(even Ferdinand is a br4 td!),the only and simple solution is add T44100 to soviet br5 with BR412D(239mm Penetration),also, the unbearable 20.8s reload time of 122 d25t makes is2 with a extreme weakness on anti Infantry ability,so if this game want to balance br5 fight ,add t44100 is necessary！

  • yes
  • no
0 voters
8 Likes
2

Add a poll and some sites

1 Like
3

make a poll or post will be closed :smiley:

1 Like
4

Just as long as a regular T-44 is added too, please.

A oft forgotten thing on the forums, that there is a base version of the tank too…

1 Like
6

Regular t44 could even be br 4. It is kinda like soviet panther with very good frontal plate but turret is extremely weak and can be penned by br 3 panzers

5 Likes
7

but I think 4485 and 44100 are both impossible, maybe darkflow have given up to update soviet tank(they have not done this for 2 years)

1 Like
8

It is the Soviet Panther

9

Be careful what you wish for.

T-44 with APCR BR5, and Gold premium T-44-100. :confused: could be a thing.

I suspect there is a reason the T-44-100 didnt come to the TT. It is a straight upgrade on the T-34-100…

10

I’m just thinking of how they did things with the Pershing and Super-Pershing.

The earlier one was added first, then came the KT-killer.

Same thing should be done here.

11

King Tiger is like a menace over here on Enlisted like it’s a final boss.

2 Likes
12

4485 is a little bit stongger than panther, but br4 is acceptable I think

13

Who cares? The Soviet faction is clearly lacking in this regard. Japan’s blueprint vehicles have been fine all along—so why the double standard? Right now, we should quickly gather some people who can actually vote to boost support. Otherwise, it’ll either be ignored or dismissed as “historically inaccurate,” and the thread will just fade into obscurity. That’s a sure sign of a cold, dead discussion.

2 Likes
14

It kind of is though. :laughing:

It has the same battlefield presence as the KV-1 does in BR III (specificly BR III downtiers), as well as the Sherman 105 does against Japan specificly.

2 Likes
17

so I believe Chi-Nu II should go to br3 to fight sherman too, the regular Chi-Nu is so weak

18

Because Russia already has a distinct advantage over Germany, and soon it will have one over Japan.

The T-44-100 really isn’t needed, and would only serve to bridge a gap in tanks that does not need to be bridged.

The T-44 85 on the other hand would be a fun addition.

20

Ok let’s be real who plays BR V? That’s just hell! BR III and BR II are the sweet spots

21

A lot of people play BR5, it’s fun in its own right. Though I think it’s about time BR5 gets decompressed into BR5 and BR6.

1 Like
23

BR II-III Italy is the best experience I’ve ever had and will continue to have

24

I have played every country of this game of br1-5 for thousands time ，so finding some new interesting weapons and vehicles is important for me and others I think,but they refuse to update soviet

25

So then perhaps you should be spending your time trying to plug the gap in the Soviet air tree at BR4, or looking into unique weapon designs, or suggesting the T-44 85.

The T-44-100 is a bad idea, the Soviets should not have a vehicle on the level of the King Tiger, neither should America. Just like how I don’t think Germany should have aircraft on the level of America or assault weapons on the level of Russia.