I could see these as a BR3 vehicle, they would be tech tree, APC, And they would be armed unlike BR2’s tech tree APC. Basically a faster glass canon version of BR2’s premium APCs. They would be just as well armed, And you would be able to snipe infantry from the driver’s seat ( or use any weapon against them for that matter). This would also include driver II or driver 3 if we use the weird naming convention of squads.
That’s the only way I can see them implementing this, these exact vehicles were already demanded to be APCs over a year ago. Each one of the posts about it have fallen upon deaf ears when it comes to the devs. As much as I hate to say it no matter how many times we post about this they’re not going to do it, but maybe if we continue to be pushy they eventually will because that’s how we’ve gotten a few of the great mechanics in the past.
In any case, no matter what we suggest, you seem to think it’s all a waste of time and development resources.
I’ll say it again: in a game, additions, fixes, and improvements are necessary for the game to run smoothly and for the community to thrive.
This forum is here to express these ideas and hope to see them incorporated into the game someday; if this forum exists, it’s because the people behind it are ready to develop and invest time—otherwise, this forum has no reason to exist.
I hope you never, ever make a game because, my poor friend, it’ll be as empty as a well since you reject every idea that doesn’t bring in a few billion for Gaijin. We’re not stock market advisors or traders here; the “return on investment” you kept harping on in my other post isn’t our problem—it’s Gaijin’s.
It’s up to them to say here whether THIS suggestion is feasible or not; otherwise, they’ll shut down the forum under the pretext that everything takes too long and is pointless… so the game would be an endless beta, in short… try giving ideas instead of saying the same things under every one of my posts—and certainly others’ as well.
And if you ever play, the motorcycles are already there, as well as the Kubelwagen, and I think the Jeep too. I’m simply asking to be able to deploy it on the battlefield—something that shouldn’t be too complicated for people whose job is to DEVELOP.
That’s exactly what I’d love to see—you’ve summed it up perfectly! Just like in Heroes and Generals, you could spawn with the vehicle, fire the machine gun while another player drove, and even transport squads across the map! And when all the seats were taken, the soldiers would hang onto the sides and back of the vehicle!
what an absolutely terrible take, respectfully. All u do is say it is a waste of resources (back to this ROI thing again, which u do not understand).
Make credible arguments as to why it is bad, assuming there are resources, because u are not criticising the substantive post
Honestly, u are just spam at this point. Every idea, no matter how big and small will take away from resources, but there is no doubt riders 2 using jeeps etc will benefit gameplay in larger maps by opening up flanking routes, keeping momentum in an offensive match and by a large enable the quick movement of squads across a map. I can see specific utility in Tunisia and Moscow, and maybe even Normandy on some maps.
Rider 2s can have larger squads, like an APC, than a Rider 1.
By and large tho, u are wrong and a naysayer and honeslty ur commenting privileges should be revoked because u just give a bad take every time
Edit: even for defenders, it can enable a quicker response time when on the backfoot, as opposed to spawning all the way behind at the spawn
Thank goodness, you’ve perfectly summed up the point of my post!
We really need to put a stop to those kinds of people who just spam negative comments and act like they’re GaiJin’s spokespeople, when we’re just trying to come up with ideas for a game we love.
There’s good ways to implement features and gear. It’s a little thing called opportunity cost. What you’re asking for is that cooler stuff doesn’t get added for the sake of having a jeep. If we’re getting a jeep instead of say new apc, new build able, new maps, etc. the jeep better be fucking worth it! I’m sorry the nuance required to choose between good and better is something that seems lost upon you. Next tell me what a cool thing horses would be to add without contemplating the opportunity cost and the worry about good implementation.
Yeah man we rlly need to vote yes to every single post that boils down to add more content! We need to make it so that the devs are equally likely to implement something that’s dead on arrival and an actually good change based off votes.
Ur trying to cripple the development even more than it already is. Ur an enemy to the game.
I literally said the only way to make these sort of vehicles viable is to give them mechanics similar to apc. Thats an alternative I gave but Reading is hard I guess
No u didnt… maybe ur illiterate self is unable to read or type because u said this:
that is very different to saying “give them mechanics similar to APC”
And no… every vehicle has utility and so an APC is sluggish and slow because it has the benefit of being used as a spawn point. Jeeps, for example, would be fast and give the added benefit of giving a squad a quick flank, momentum in a match, or defenders the ability to quickly respond to a break through and counter their momentum.
Every vehicle has a pro and a con. A pro of an APC is listed above, a natural con is how it cannot flank.
I don’t think u are arguing in good faith my man, respectfully reconsider ur opinion
ok buddy.