Yes. Rally points also have a radius!
Oh no the grammar Nazi got me.
If the thing ur adding is so bad it needs to be br 1 to be implemented, consider the fact that maybe it’s not a good addition.
u also did not respond to my point about timers / cool down
I didn’t assume that. I’m bringing up the question as to why can’t these additions be apc instead of rider class?
Because u cannot argue from a position where not everyone has this vehicle - whereas I am arguing for a position where everyone has access to a slow and clunky APC. It is an unfairness which u have not accounted for, just assumed exists
Again state to me why you’re disagreeing with me that these should be apc instead of riders. The point I’ve been making since the start of the post but I guess it’s hard for you to read little buddy
What should be APC? A jeep should be a APC?
No. A jeep should not be a APC.
1 Like
Why not?
Because for the purpose of balancing which u cannot comprehend u need to have a literal mobile spawn centre to be slow as spawns basically lead to the winning / losing of the game. Is that not self-evident? Am I messaging to a brick wall?
So what’s the uni carrier?
it is an event squad APC - which as I said, it an event squad, and it is only available for some factions, and has a medium-slow speed…
It’s a apc that almost every nation has
The uni carrier apparently has medium to slow speed!! First time I’m hearing that
2/4 factions have the uni carrier - so 50% of the playable factions do not have it
I think the current game map is not large enough. Driving these light vehicles makes it difficult to fully utilize their high mobility (the distance between each target is only about 150 meters). Not to mention that even a small rock or a depression in the game can jam your vehicle’s physics engine. At the very least, you can’t drive around and cause destruction like you can with the jeeps in games like Battlefield.
A man who’s points get proven wrong again and again yet refuses to amend his position is clearly a man more interested in being right than finding out what’s true
I am yet to have a single one of my points disproven - go through what I have said one by one and state where it is wrong and where u are right
Having a jeep as an APC still never was the purpose of this post. If u feel so passionately about it, make ur own post / suggestion
Apc aren’t mobile! They clearly can be. Uni carrier.
Apc are too big! Not all of them. Uni carrier.
A jeep can’t be a apc. The capacity is too low! Uni carrier.
Half of the nations don’t have uni carrier! No only Germany doesn’t have one.
lol
The Uni carrier is not the basic APC for all nations. Try again. That was my metric for basing my claims.
Also… the very basis of an APC is to be a larger clunky vehicle which can:
- withstand RPG shots (generally speaking)
- be difficult to manoeuvre
- be larger than usual
all of the above is for balancing purposes. Again, the debate about the uni carrier is a bit of a red herring, something I won’t engage with because there are pros and cons to having it in the game
Lesley those aren’t rules seeing how the uni carrier exists. Just cuz it’s uncommon doesn’t make it stop existing. Even if it is rlly inconvenient for ur arguments
Ngl we have gotten side tracked and I appreciate for the purposes of your arguments doing so is beneficial, but u really have failed to engage with the original post