A Mobile Machine Gun Alternative for the Western Axis (German) Arsenal

Lahti AL-43: A Mobile BR V LMG Option for the Western Axis


"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

WEAPON CONCEPT: Lahti AL-43 (Finland / Germany)

PROPOSED ROLE: High-Mobility, Intermediate-Cartridge LMG (RD-44 Counterpart)

PROPOSED BR: Battle Rating V

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

image


Heyoooo, Forum Dwellers!!!

The current Western Axis machine gun arsenal at BR V is heavily defined by raw firepower: massive cyclic rates, full rifle cartridges, and massive belt boxes. However!!! :point_up: :point_up: :point_up: This comes at a high cost to tactical movement; all current BR V German MGs suffer from a strict 50% sprint factor.

This suggestion proposes the addition of the Lahti AL-43, a prototype Finnish light machine gun. It provides Western Axis commanders with a nimble, run-and-gun playstyle option that fills the exact same operational niche as the Soviet RD-44, all without power-creeping existing options.


Historical Background & Development (Click to Expand)

Design Philosophy

Designed in 1943 by famed Finnish arms engineer Aimo Lahti, the AL-43 was spurred by early military interest in an “assault rifle/SMG hybrid” concept similar to the German 7.92 Kurz. Lacking state resources for a full military program during wartime, Lahti initiated a private venture using shortened 6.5×55mm SE cases.



Internal Conflict & Cancellation

This private venture sparked severe friction with VKT (Valtion Kivääritehdas ) management, who accused Lahti of misusing company resources. The AL-43 was rejected by the Weapons-HQ of the Finnish Army HQ, with Major General V. Svanström playing a central role in the decision. Lahti continued private efforts until the Allied Control Commission halted all experimental projects at the end of WWII. Only prototypes were built. As late as 1951, the Finnish military still regarded the assault rifle concept as a passing trend, before adopting the Soviet 7.62×39mm in 1956–57. Today, the design is recognized as being remarkably far ahead of its time.


image


Although the AL-43 was rejected, Lahti continued developing the concept. By the late 1950s he designed the L-51 , a gas-action development based on the AL-43, chambered for experimental 7.62×41mm and 9×41mm cartridges. The Finnish military again showed no interest, and it is uncertain if any L-51 prototype was ever built. This further proves that Lahti was far ahead of his time.

  • Country of Origin: Finland
  • Overall Length: 39 inches (99 cm)
  • Empty Weight: 12 lbs (5.6 kg)
  • Magazine weight: 5.3 lbs (2.4) kg fully loaded / 2.9 lbs (1.3 kg) empty
  • Feed System: 56-round drum magazine
  • Fire Modes: Select-fire: semi-automatic and full-automatic
  • Cyclic Rate: 800 RPM
  • Action: Delayed Blowback / Delayed Recoil
  • Production Status: Prototypes only, 1943 - 1944; never mass-produced or issued

Cartridge Mechanics (Click to Expand)

The 7.62×35mm Lahti Intermediate Round

The initial AL-43 prototype utilized a 9×35mm cartridge, but by 1944, Lahti transitioned the platform to 7.62×35mm . Both cartridges used shortened 6.5×55mm Swedish Mauser cases, manufactured by VPT (Valtion Patruunatehdas ) from surplus brass tied to a 1941 Swedish military order. All Lahti AL-43 cartridges carry the VPT 41 headstamp.


image


Ballistically, the 7.62×35mm Lahti round was directly comparable to the StG 44’s 7.92×33mm Kurz.

Why this matters for Enlisted:

By shifting away from full-powered rifle rounds, the AL-43 avoids competing with the raw stopping power of the MG 42 or MG 15. Instead, it mirrors the damage performance profile of the Soviet RD-44 (7.62×39mm).

  • No Artificial Nerfs Required: Using an intermediate cartridge justifies lower recoil and high mobility naturally via internal ballistics.
  • Balanced Mobility: Grants the German faction an aggressive assault LMG without breaking weapon-class balancing rules.

In-Game Implementation & Stat Breakdown

  • Proposed Battle Rating: BR V
  • Primary Playstyle: High mobility, aggressive push, low recoil control.
  • Historical note: The AL-43 was an automatic rifle/light machinegun hybrid, proposed here as an LMG for gameplay role parity with the RD-44.
  • Total ammunition: 112 rounds (one loaded 56-round drum + one spare drum)
  • Obtainability suggestion: Battle Pass Reward
  • Gameplay note: Historical muzzle velocity is 670 m/s. If balance requires parity with RD-44, developers may adjust, but the table uses the historical value.

Comparative Performance Matrix

Metric Lahti AL-43 (GER) RD-44 (USSR) MG 42 / 100 (GER)
Damage (10m / 100m) 9.6 / 7.5 9.9 / 7.9 13.2 / 11.9
Muzzle Velocity 720 m/s 720 m/s 750 m/s
Capacity 56 rounds 100 rounds 100 rounds
Reload Speed ~3.6s 5.1s 5.61s
Rate of Fire 890 RPM 830 RPM 990 RPM
Recoil (V / H) 18 / 5 16 / 7 14 / 15
Dispersion 0.28 0.34 0.41
Sprint Speed Factor 80% 80% 50%
Weapon Weight 8.0 kg 7.4 kg 14.4 kg

Reload Logic Note: The 56-round pan/drum magazine allows for a noticeably faster mag swap compared to heavy belt-fed boxes like those on the MG 42. I think it should only have 112 Rounds in total, including the magazine inserted into the gun, similarishly to the current MG34 or MG42.


Strategic Niche

  1. vs. RD-44 (USSR): Direct counterpart. Slightly less damage, but trades raw belt capacity (56 vs 100 rounds) for a slightly faster cyclic, cleaner reload cycle, dispersion, and handling.
  1. vs. MG 42 / MG 15 (GER): Trades high raw damage output and suppression for vastly superior sprint mobility (80% vs 50%) and minimal recoil.

:poland: :poland: :poland: Polls Polls Polls :poland: :poland: :poland:

Would YOU like to see the Lahti AL-43 added as a BR V LMG for the Western Axis?
  • YES! It fills a much-needed mobility gap.
  • Nah, current German MGs are sufficient.
  • Unsure / Need more testing data.
0 voters
What is your preferred Implementation Method? (Select up to 2)
  • Tech Tree Weapon
  • BP Reward Weapon
  • Event Weapon
  • Premium Squad
  • Event Squad
0 voters
Do you agree with -iii-, that Germany should get an intermediate-cartridge, high-mobility LMG?
  • Yes, the 50% sprint speed penalty on high-tier MGs is far too limiting. -iii- is a GENIUS.
  • No, Germany’s heavy firepower offsets the mobility penalty, so it’s fine.
  • I’m nonchalant and indifferent.
0 voters

Spasibo for reading!! Please leave any suggestions in the comments, and SMASH that like button!!!

Source 1: https://www.cartridgecollector.net/cartridge/762-x-35-lahti-l-43/

Source 2: https://www.jaegerplatoon.net/ALMOST1.htm

Source 3: https://forum.enlisted.net/t/lahti-al-43-for-germany/174928

Source 4: https://forum.enlisted.net/t/weapons-for-leveling-event-lahti-al-43/155786



Signed, The One & Only, -iii-

5 Likes

Already has been noted, but thanks for the suggestion

1 Like