I dont talk it to you, but some other person here - for me all the weapons count and i have a right to be on this point - all the stuff is in the game so it matters
You’re staring blindy at the RoF stat that you fail to consider literally everything else about BR III MGs.
Reload speed, sprint speed, ADS speed, recoil (real and visual both). All stats that went unnoticed, apparently.
This is isn’t even touching the subject of historical values, which you have provided none of, the MG had a high RoF, there is no flaw in the game on that point. If anything the MG 42 has too low a RoF compared to historical values, but that’s another gun and another topic.
Since you mentionedthat this discussion only applies to BR III, why are you mentioning BR V btw?
Funny you mention that, If I remember correctly, he said this earlier, seems like a contradiction, no?
Funny how the guy saying that the svt 38 is bad is suposed to correctly judge the power level of mgs now.
I think he already resigned
Easy and simple, why does it have a different doctrine based on suppressing enemy fire to meet the needs and demands of the Germans
As well as the American, British, and Soviet machine guns, which were the opposite Blame your faction’s doctrine, but don’t drag Germany into this to give its enemies more comfort.
Or are you going to tell me that all Soviet submachine guns must have 550 ROF like the MP40 to be balanced?Of course you won’t like it as much as the others
Sorry, but no. If anything there should be a MG34 belt fed variant with 100 rounds for high tier. The BR-3 one should stay as it is.
Well I guess follow your logic - soviets have a doctrine making a good sem auto rifles, eah?
So, tell me how other stats of japs or soviet mgs at br 3 can change a point?
I have no complaints about my Gewehr 43 or the 41 outside of the reloading system But we can also talk about how Germany was also good at making the only assault rifle of WWII used in combat.
I just did.
There are more stats than just raw RoF, and those other do have an impact on how the guns perform.
If you can’t understand this, you shouldn’t be making “balance” suggestions.
Thats why we have MKB 35 at br 2 and MKB at br 3?
So try to explain which stats making less rof better? Is some DP have a huge advantage? Show then, you just cant
Maybe thats why this 10 rounds magasine of MKB have 15 rounds, ese?
Golden weapons. But I also mention the AS-44 in the Soviet TT, unlike the German weapons you mentioned. Both the MKB 42(H) and MP43/STG44 saw combat, but the others did not, and where one It’s TT and the other golden weapon/Event
Maybe I can fire Mg 81 from a hands as well?
You’re talking about a machine gun that weighs less than an MG42 It was also used in the defenses of German cities. And also the MG81Z
the soviets have a 10rnd detachable magazine rifle at br3. Why some exception for just one side pal
You suppose to say - so be some advantage for axis in mg and some goods for su with a sem auto rifle? Hmm, thats an idea?