Do you have proof it should have reduced rate of fire? Rate of fire is fixed and should never, no matter the weapon, be changed for balance.
Then move the MG-34 to BR4 with it’s current stats, same with the SVT-38. Germany has acceptable BR2 MGs
Dude the DP-27 is hella good! What are you on about?!
5 Likes
Your statement has given me an inspiration. I can use this statement to counterattack others. Since you want to reduce the unrealistic two-stage bridge-loading method used in VT38, can I ask you to use the MG42 and 34.81 to match the slow firing rate of those Browning machine guns? But now, the Manchuria English forum is arguing loudly about weakening plate armor and even wanting it to disappear. I’m worried that this wave of enthusiasm will be extraordinary. If the Japanese major shareholders get angry, with this unique combat engineer’s uniform gone, it would be truly a sad thing. The problem is that with such a great advantage, I really enjoy playing as the Soviet side.
1 Like
The recoil of DP27 is really too weak. I still prefer the more stable DPM model at the back. Ah, the Soviet machine gun actually emphasizes just one word: “Stability”.
In fact, the game now is actually firing guns based on historical facts, and assigning similar weights based on strength and similarity. You guys are so eager to weaken the Svt38. I think you’d be better off thinking the opposite - how to find a Soviet rifle with a bipod and loading mechanism. Is it meaningful to focus on a rifle with a magazine for reloading? If one day you were to require each G-43 and other rifles to be loaded one bullet at a time, wouldn’t you explode?
Add an actual source to the suggestion, without it it will be locked
5 Likes
10 Likes
Try even write the way people can understand your delusion
So, sweet miss, is there somethere evidence SVT have to be load something except ammo magasine, you sure you are not bias?
It’s about balance, not historical accuracy. The SVT should be balanced according to other BR III rifles, otherwise you’d have tigers fighting in 1942 maps.
2 Likes
didnt see a 2 message up Euthimia post about sources? Becouse sometime historical accuracy matters (then axis guns I suppose).
Well, Also I want to ask you - there is my gdm PPsh silenced. You guys tells it will be given but some another way - not in a tech tree. The photo is real. But a half of a year - a silence. Whats a problem with it?
1 Like
The thing is my topic is a mirror to this one, but you aint write there - you write here.
you can see for yourself. This one is much older. Why mention my, I wonder
1 Like
You do realise that arguing isn’t going to do shit, right? Either you find a source for changing the rate of fire, which shouldn’t be changed for balance reasons no matter the weapon that shit’s fixed, or this is getting closed.
1 Like
Well, find a source about early Mg-34 with 600 rof switch - not a big deal. In other hand a question here but not in equal topic about svt - means something, I guess.
No its not, SVT could be both loaded with stripper clips or magazines. But as other BR III Semi-Autos have it with clips, SVT-38 should have it as well as per design, game thing that doesnt require any sources.
But reducing RoF of MG-34 to the rate above is just anti-historical
5 Likes
Don’t worry Декард I’m here to save you after the parrot is gone we don’t have enough fanatics here is your source so they don’t unfairly silence you 
1 Like
Its not - early version have 600 rof option. So, if I cant properly reload my rifle (which is lie), so I can fire my mg only in a 600 rof switch. Fair, isnt it?
Do you have any proof of the 600 number?
1 Like
I do see here quite a lot people who cant eat and sleep, but any time want to nerf something in soviet side. Since the beggining of this blessed game pass 5 years. I remember SVT-38 since spring of 2021 - and somehow it works all this long time. But now - WOW its a problem! Who is parrots here after all, boss?