You're uncomfortable with some weapons being powerful after all

Suggestions
1

You people insist on ‘equality’ but in the end it doesn’t make sense.

Why should automatic fire, which is an advanced method of bolt action developed before World War I, have similar performance?

Your argument is just to nerf the performance of high-tech weapons for balance.

You don’t consider restrictions on the supply of firearms or economic penalties.
just offended that high-tech guns are more powerful than antique guns
Stuart is weaker than Tiger and Panther, so it’s no different from the argument to increase Stuart’s armor and equip him with a powerful gun for Newb.

You guys are just emotionally uncomfortable and don’t think of a better way.

A simple damage buff is not the right way. At least excessive differences between guns using the same bullets

-Economic patches
-Limiting the quantity of automatic rifles that can be equipped
-The economic benefits of BA

22 Likes
2

So if all weapons do 400 damage and kill with one bullet like in real life? You are fine? Or no because assault weapons dont are the meta?

2 Likes
3

hey, remember:

image

( ignore the first part which could be true )

they have stats, and we don’t.

so surely they know something more than us due to chart.

( and i know it’s related to wt. but still )

4

It’s none of my business whether it’s meta or not. It just doesn’t make sense

5

I wouldn’t be against it if the game maps were design to it, they weren’t and that’s the only issue with it.

New players will not have a easy time, as I said before, now they still have no chance on CQC because while the recoil got increased it got more predictable too and now only rest to them to camp and get a few bot kills that are the biggest victims of the BA buff.

Newcomers will still depend and even more so than before on veterans to push and get the 1,5 xp bonus for victory.

6

The way how he wrote it, makes me think its troll.

7

well, it kinda is.

before, people used to spam automatic guns.

spamming bolt action rifles it’s less harmfull even if they do alot of damage. compared to when they didn’t.

8

unfortunately, he is not that trolly as you might believe.

there’s an entire section of these :upside_down_face:

1 Like
9

Most of the maps/ playable areas have distances of 50-100 meters from spawm to cp.

Huh

1 Like
10

Limit the number of FG42’s or AVT’s in a rifle squad to 2 and the same people complaining about bolt action buffs will be complaining that -

“bUt I sPeNt aLL tHesE sIlVeR oRdeRs oN tHeSe wEaPonS, I sHoulD hAve aS mAnY aS I wAnt reeeeeeeeee” ,

Or

“I sPenT 10 tRillIOn hOurs gRinDing fOr thIs gUn, wHy caNt I ruN thRee 9 mAn rIfle sQuaDs wiTh iT reeeeeeee”

5 Likes
11

Yeah. Keofox always had this lets call it diplomatic choice of words.

1 Like
12

If Devs really want to make Semi-auto/Automatic rifle limit, They need to add Automatic Weaponry Training Upgrade in Rifleman Squad or just simple perks, making Rifleman can use Semi-Auto/Automatic rifles.

13

Yes this would do much better.

6 Likes
14

" shoot first, ask questions later " should probably be his motto :joy:

1 Like
15

But is that realistic?

16

I dont know dude maybe bullet kill you, i dont remind real life weapon have damage statistics :clown_face:

17

" WE DON’T EVEN LOOK AT SUGGESTIONS "

:thinking:

1 Like
18

I agree with you.
Bolt action buffs are ridiculous.
damn why? I don’t understand if the user who invested 500 hours in the game and the user who only invested 5 hours in the game should be equal.

3 Likes
19

In real, German Grenadier Squad, used one MP40/Squad leader, one MGgunner, and 8 Riflemans.

20

Why did people use it to spam? It’s because there’s no quantity limit and it’s powerful. Automatic rifles are, of course, powerful. They were historically low in quantity. But it was also historically powerful.
The reason why the bolt action is still used in ww2 is not because the bolt action is strong.

1 Like