because customs are for the majority played for PVE. and… funny yellow stars.
you see more “empty” rooms with only one / few players rather than the full ones.
it’s called perception my friend.
( and i totally do not the same. no no )
yes pure PVE can be fun too, but thats not what devs wanted it seems
Most of the playerbase prefers the game being historical and not a braindead, arcade, generic fps like CoD and Battlefield, so joke’s on you, boyo
10 Likes
hell it would be nice if that was to happen, but i would in pacific campaign , i be happy for them just to shoot, back, at this point in time, they are not.
1 Like
they have thought about that, and there are fraction of pve codes in the editor…
which, speaking of, a lunatic like me can do pves ( though do not comes with xps ). so… they left the idea for a bit i feel like it.
not totally out though ( luckily )
( b U H. W H E R E A R E Y O U R M O D S ?
currently unpublished because they over reach the limit of 10 mbs over the portal and therefore cannot be uploaded 
end me… )
1 Like
not many people understands why people who like to play PVE play enlisted 
well it might be weird but i was grown up on PVE games for i had no internet back in a day… it can be quite relaxing to play only against PC itself, but capable one
nah.
the idea behind PVEs is for people like me to not stomp on newer players with latter equipment, allow people with bad internet to play, and newcomers to get the feeling and controls of the game.
play it more slowly without the excessive full auto spams or explosives etc.
after all, it’s much easier to do historical accuracy against bots than players.
that’s the main idea.
plus, i love me playing some game with a couple of friends, cooperate with each other and achieve different objectives.
as for example, a gamemode with different type objectives is more easier for bots to perform rather than players ( since the majority do not play the obj in the first place ).
perhaps that’s just me getting burned out of the same shenanigans .
3 Likes
i think i love you hehe
1 Like
the same goes for normal matches
so… in topic about historical accuracy we found out that AI has to improved ? sounds like spoiler on a next update
well, i kinda went off topic.
but, for historical accuracy matchmaker we need sets of rules/limitations, improvements of ais, and i think that would be pretty good to go.
similar to simulatives in WT.
not many plays them, but those who does, loves it.
( i mean, we are headed there anyway. are we not? )
2 Likes
Kind of the oposite.
In general the game is going more into the arcade theritory. After this update the game will be not far from being as acurate as BFV in terms of equipment (we don’t talk about bfv’s customisation that is abhorent and should be concidered a crime against humanity).
2 Likes
lol after you posted
so… you are agreeing with me here.
WT is for the majority arcady.
well, no. and no.
you wont see tigers in moscow as often.
and the equipment is around the same ammount of 
s.
kid you not, BFV uniforms were actually good. only redeeming quality of that game ( outside the censored ones or clownery of the shop ). ( and the reason why i preorded it . loved me running with favorite medic blondie vulks armed with VG 1-5 in narvik or twisted steel jokes aside the last german uniforms, the USA and japanese ones and a few from the bp were actually very good.)
idk if game could endure 2 simultaneous MM with one arcade and one historical. i assume they actually made some calculation based on actual data on why historical MM is not possible and why they abandoned it. could be cause of low number of players in off peak hours, or cause some BR players would have to wait too long for match to be made. also they would need to implement GUI that will warn players when they have non historical equipment for some campaigns.
considering they have data on battles they could easily simulate different MM algorithms.
1 Like
As I understand it, maps will be random. But I guess the future news will tell.
The quality of visuals were great, not gonna lie.
Shame that they went with the wrong ‘type’ of visuals.
And the joke is that they somewhat repeated this stupidity in BF2024 (or sth, I don’t care).
you got a point good sir.
it is what it is.
true, but at the same time, we don’t know for sure.
Enlisted never really have been historical accurate. so we don’t know for sure.
but, a different matchmaker how hard or difficult would it be?
again, WT has arcade, realistic and simulative.
almost no one plays sim, though you can play them and after 10 mins you might find something.
in a game like enlisted, i don’t think that would be that bad since we do have AIs ( granted, need some works ).
Yeah, because all the people who just want a fun, balanced game left already
well cause 90% of opposition is PVE you have bots everywhere in enlisted. bots that mascerade as players, bots in your squad, players that play like bots…
2 Likes
There is no difference between people queuing in a separate MM or customs.
They don’t have any data on how many people would like to play historical, nobody does.
So at best they can estimate basing on social media and lodouts in game, both of whitch don’t mean much.
1 Like