what part don’t you understand of the weapon not facing the japanese forces because they don’t have anything that the japanes have of similar? therefore it has been " moved " rather than removed because of br balances?
if i can’t explain it, i’m sure she will @Euthymia07
ah yes, content that you bought and have been mislead is on par on a weapon being balanced against the opposition ( because a lack there of ).
Anyway, I don’t agree with this battle rating system. The faction progression overhaul is great. I’m sure they will change and work on it as time goes on
Hi. They will not be removed. But US will be restricted to only early war weaponry in Pacific because Japan doesn’t have enough late war equipment.
“The exception would be the Pacific. The U.S. side will only get into battles against Japan with early war weapons, as Japan does not currently have weapons and vehicles from the later stages of the war.”
What? After the merger campaign, the Pacific cannot use M2???
I raised the M2 carbine to full star in Normandy and then transferred it to the Pacific Ocean. I spent more than 500 copper cards and told us that the Pacific Ocean could not use M2 after the merger???
Dude is the simply concept of the battle rating matchmaking, if your opponent use bolt-action you cant go figth them with an smg you can give to every soldier
The m2 can show up again in the pacific when japan BR get raised for now pacific is only BA, early smg and semi-auto with shitty tank and plane