In the pacific, carriers do decent job
Its not excessive or unrealistic thing.
Every army who conquered a new big/distant terrirtory also needs new logistical hubs for planes.
Germany used france’s airfields to conduct battle of britain
Allies used/constructed new airfields in sicily and south italy to bomb germany from south
Etc…
So, why not distant airfields on ground like carriers in pacific for every map with aa gun protection ?
11 Likes
Unrelated but I have the minimal 2 games a week to post but I can’t create a topic can someone suggest what I can do to fix this
2 Likes
Trust level.
Write comments and give likes to increase it. It’s quite fast.
4 Likes
Ok thanks
4 Likes
I think this is eventually inevitable and we’ll see airfields one day, devs are just too busy with merge/tech trees currently. Which is pretty much understandable.
Plus airfields would probably just bring another overdramatic shttstorm (just like paras, which is funny. After few weeks, nobody cries about them anymore) about how unbalanced they are (or some nonsense like that) as I know this community.
1 Like
With airfields hopefully they’ll add new aircraft not just variations of the same plane over and over.
5 Likes
I like variants
Like me- 400 with bomb or rocket
2 Likes
no point in that… just like there is no point about complaining about anything else in this game.
and yes paras are OP considering their versatility and ability to drop with pinpoint accuracy anywhere in playable area. and what makes it worse is that there is no f2p alternative so that makes it p2w squad.
1 Like
No they are not
They added them to worst possible campaign to use paras.
Excluding conquest and normandy beach maps, most dense and narrow maps are in normandy.
Majority of the para landings (lets say %60 of them) ends with disaster.
1 Like
Some aircraft I would like to see in game are
- F4U Corsair
- F6F Hellcat
- C.202 Macchi Folgore. Fun fact: one wing was longer than the other to counter balance the torque from the engine and propeller.
- A-36 apache. A ground attack version of the P-51 with dive brakes.
- Ta 152 H-1
- J5N1
(I couldn’t find any interesting soviet fighters. They were all just YAKs)
2 Likes
The resources require to make English airfield for D-Day would be waste of ehm ressources.
1 Like
Because flying planes in this game is like solving a rubiks cube in the dark when all the sticks have been taken off, it’s hard enough to get the plane to do what you want in a fight let alone landing it without exploding
1 Like
I know its probably blasphemy but they could simply put aircraft carrier there.
I diagnose you with chronic skill deficiency syndrome
1 Like
When I’m trying to bomb a target my plane ends up flying at a 45 degree angle unable to get on target. Sometimes my plane will lose momentum and I’ll simply fall out of the sky trying to fly straight. I wonder if its connection related because it seems a lot easier to fly in training mode, but even so I do get those same issues to a lesser degree there.
Idk why but training mode psyhics is not working as gameplay.
I often bomb accurately in gameplay.
In training mod, its harder
Sounds like you need to adjust your aircraft’s button setup. Are you playing with a M&K or a controller?
1 Like
I really enjoy the aircraft carriers in pacific for when your plane is sick
and as a long time Warthunder Pilot there is a great satisfaction (fun) in nursing your wounded bird back to the airfield and making a miraculous landing with no elevator/controls…Would be nice if the option in enlisted, instead of slowly falling out of the sky.
I am sure it will show up. Carriers were the prelude
Carriers make most aircraft really, really bad.
Spending 10 minutes trying to build up speed and getting shot down well before you have any chance really makes them feel non-viable.
You could still have them, But first spawn air spawn. Or choose air spawn.