Tbf seeing the shit people ask to add for the game, BR6 wouldnt be empty for too long, could be cool as a “what if the war went on a year or two longer” BR, full of immediately post war weapons and vehicles.
i never said anything about over bloated i just said it would make balancing easier and better
that should also make the devs add good br 4/5 semi autos with 20rds etc.
2 Likes
I guess disagreeing and arguing with one’s own opinion is hatred these days.
Very interesting.
2 Likes
its that you dont have valid arguments only cope as always tho, thank you anyway <3
You either miss the topic completly or dont bring anything new to the topic.
2 Likes
±0 MM would make balancing even way more easier. 
I expressed myself in an unfortunate way. I didn’t mean you personally. More like your side of an argumentation.
I mean they kinda are, especially for Jets, but also, its not like any SF could be lowered in BR to fit the BR4 SA gaps.
I mean honestly BR6 atm could just be a place for over the top vehicles like the IS-3 and Jagdtiger and T-95. Just set those vehicles to BR6, and everyone can keep using BR5 small arms.
It could work similar to how WT naval works, where you can bring aircraft up to 1.0 above the max rating of ships, at the cost that you will only face top tier of course.
Can you explain me how 4 (+2 premiums) jets can be considered an overbloated?
Plus they could always lower BR5 props to BR4. It’s not like current BR4 planes are used by anyone by great extent. Most of them are even worse or on par with BR3 planes.
Yeah, let’s cripple the MM just for the sake of adding unnecessary vehicles that you can already play in WT.
When you could instead trying to achieve ±0 MM. Of which literally every BR would benefit.
Not to mention all these vehicles with long reload time is not even something fun to play.
While Im inclined to agree, they are also not something fun to play against, BR6 would allow these post war vehicles or just generally over the top designs their own place in the game.
What by making SF BR have to worry about uptiers to stronger tanks/aircraft because I cant think of any small arms atm that should be BR6.
Like we clearly have the playerbase to allow more varied matchmaking, so whats the harm in it?
I mean its overbloated when any of those 4 jets completely obsolete the previous aircraft. (They would be fine if they had their actual turn times instead of the cartoon physics they have atm tbf).
But just generally, BR5 is a very dense block of equipment for most nations, I mean what you could also do with BR6, is just move everything from BR3 up one, and fit the new BR inbetween the current BR2 and BR3, a new BR3(BR2.5).
br 6 for post war, what we nees is a br 0 and all brs fight only their br
Most of them are WW2.
Potentially, All SF rifles could be.
They have way superior performance. I think ARs should clearly be better than SF rifles of the same BR. Since they are much more limited in number.
That’s not the case though. They are on par with them. If not slightly worse.(Keep in mind that SF rifles have the added feature of being able to be given to more or less any specialist)
But I don’t think there is a need for another BR. I think it’s more a case of bad design. That could easily be resolved by reworking the SF rifles. There are many potential options for how to redesign them.
2 Likes
There is good reason I tacked on the
I wouldnt be opposed to it, I completely agree AR’s should be better than them. I think the SF is cancerous.
By all means suggest such redesigns, however till then, its just the way it is. Not to mention I think its much easier to add BR6 for the devs, and just throw the worst offenders up to BR6 instead.
So what? It would be easy for them to add Maus to BR1.
But it is not the right thing to do. Just like adding a new BR.
There’s no need for it. Meanwhile there’s need for many other different improvements.
I mean its much easier than completely redesigning how SF work, so that strawman makes no sense here.
Also why wouldnt it be the right thing to do? We have the player numbers to allow an expanded BR range, it would allow decompression at all BRs to a degree even.
Because ±0 MM should be priority. Adding another BR just to pretend like it’s solving anything is not step in right direction.
Adding new BR goes straight against ±0 MM.
They have clearly shown by now they are not adding ±0 MM, no matter how much we want it, they wont add it.
So offering other options at this point is more than logical.
Also Im not convinced anymore that ±0 Match making is the way, I actually like facing a tiger or panther in a sherman or T-34. Like dont get me wrong, it would fix many issues, but I do think we would lose something with it too.
They did not.
Otherwise they wouldn’t prevent Japanese BR3 to face BR4.
Literally the opposite is true.
I mean that is clearly because they fucked up hard with all the Japanese GO and event weapons and dont know what to put for a BR4 lineup, not because they want to add ±0MM, I mean at least making it so everyone doesnt face BR5 from BR4 might be considered a sign of it, but not this.
This is an element of pure incompetence/laziness, not the beginnings of ±0 MM.
I would love it if BR 1-5 were only stuff properly used in WW2.
No Su-9 1946, no Hyde, no Fedorov in Berlin.
And BR6 with a matchmaking rule of ±0 was “prototypes land”, even with all factions playing against eachother on all available maps for the “fun” enjoyers.
2 Likes
it migth work but adding more brs and with bad matchmaking going to horrible mm it will just screw up stuff cuz i know that br 5-6 will face each other and you can easily realize that 2 brs will be dead (Br 4-5)
There’s no point in adding more BRs as long as we don’t have ±0 BR MM
The opposite is true, it’s only counterproductive.
the opposite is true with ±0 BR MM we will never get more brs
second br5 is not br5 the jump from br4 to br5 is missing a real br4
10 shot sa to 20 sf is too extreme
bangs drum
'world of tanks ±2 br 10 br ww2 3br mw7 qs
enlisted 12 qs 16 with sov vs jap
±0 BR MM 15 to 20 with 5 current brs
you forgot the fg42 1 without nerfs to the fg42 1, or buffs to the m2 these guns are not equal. i dont want people pretending they are it is nice to move op guns, all op guns to a br6.