Dunno. There is a big difference between 2 out of 22 and 8 out of 22, especially if 8 out 8 are BR3+.
Maybe also because the whole point of an indepdent TT is to play said nation B and not nation A renamed.
Yes and yet still it doesnt change the fact that France BR3+ tank stuffso far is 100% foreign and one third in total, which is not the same compared to Soviets having around 10%/ two foreign planes out of 22.
No existing TT in Enlisted has such a ridiclous Tequali-like number of foreign equipment.
According to robhir, number are growing.
Would like to know which numbers you actually see.
And it is no wonder that no one plays Japan because Japan has the worst tanks, all low BR planes start from carrier on Pacific matchs, they have the worst SA rifles, they dont have BR3+ launchers and a lot of stuff is overtiered and their MGs are mid, only the Type Hei M16 Super Rifle is the best weapon.
So that makes me wonder why so many morons want more undeveloped nations when Japan barely attracts people and not just because DF does not release enough content but because RL Japan was only good at planes.
âNewlyâ
I dont know from which Saddam-Hussein cave you crawl out, but the last major update was three months ago and the last major BR5 additions for Japan was in spring 2024, so I wouldnt call it new.
From the video website YouTube that I have browsed, the uploaded related videos is gradually decreasing, and the motivation to attract new players is insufficient. The growth data you listed may just come from players who came from War Thunder
Iâm not talking about what this update brings, but rather about the new 5BR weapons that have been added to the 5BR every time before. Perhaps there will be stronger 5BR weapons in future updates, and then they will be abandoned by players again
Moreover, in reality, Japan can only gather up to 4BR worth of TTs at most, as the appearance of inappropriate weapons in 5BR resulted in a gap in strength and subsequently caused a gap in the player community, although this is just one of the reasons
Because most war game with tech trees with truncated trees cut the lower levels not the higher ones. So we are more likely to loose br1 2 then 4 5 in a faction. Also we have 4 factions two axis two allies. So maybe if italy was a faction, nah contenting content especially paid would never happen.
Canât Italy and Britain sell those weak 5BR weapons or vehicles from Germany and US as gold team in 4BR?
It should be noted that in the previous assumption of room allocation, Italy and UK could only enter matches with a maximum of 4BR.
For example, putting the Tiger E of 5BR in Germany on 4BR in Italy as a gold team and putting Tiger H1 on TTs will certainly make the Germans of 4BR envious, because Germans of 5BR canât match their Italian teammates, but Soviets and Americans of 3-4BR can still defeat the Tiger.
I donât think it is worth buying the 5BR British tank in the store now, but it is still very attractive when placed in the 4BR of UK. However, in the end, we still need to achieve a match of at most 4BR for Italy and UK.
Unlike you who didnt even bother to create or refer to one?
But I still struggle to see what you write here. What is Thunder of War? Did you fail to write War Thunder correctly?
Truley the best metric to count player numbers.
Player number at least for 2024 were fine and even better compared to 2024. If you dont have any scientific method to disprove it, go watch your youtube videos.
What the hell, dude?
The company is Russo-Hungarian and its sole major business deal was with GAEA GROUP Inc., which is Chinese. There is no evidence for Japanese takeover or âshareholdersâ.
What ? There are already BR5 weapons in game that currently belongs to the UK (Event Vickers MG, BP bren with 100 rounds, premium firefly tank, premium flamethrower squad) and to Italy (Breda PG CR (the 4 round burst one), premium flamethrower squad)
I have no idea how you want to restrict Italy and UK to BR4 max even though they already have BR5 stuff in the game.
Japan being limited to BR4 until they got the Hei rifle was terrible.
Many people were just overstacking the japanese faction, no one played BR4 USA. So japan was overdominant with onesided BR4 Japan vs BR3 USA. Like everyone playing USA was using BR5 lineup to avoid fighting the japanese.
These weapons face German Tiger King H at 5BR, they are feeble to fight. Donât you think that these superior teams have no one to buy because of these. This is also one of the reasons why DF dont know how to make money, as I mentioned.
Yes, since 4BR will definitely match 5BR now, 4BR cannot become a BR that players can play for a long time.
But the rules have already been assumed to be modified, allowing players to enter matches up to 4BR, which will undoubtedly allow them to play US 4BR.
In addition, the weapons of 4BR are not necessarily better than those of 3BR. In my opinion, the SA rifles of 4BR in Japan, that is, at the level of G.41 of Germany 3BR , the Japanese tanks can easily be destroyed by Sherman(75) in 3BR, and even the aircraft is not much better than the P-51D. In terms of submachine guns and machine guns, each has its own advantages and disadvantages
Yes, thank you for your explanation. It makes me feel that Enlisted is still considered the best WWII FPS game in the world in all aspects, even though the new BP has been delayed for almost half a month
And itâs not a forced move to remove all British TTs, because the British 5BR will only become an awkward presence like the Japanese 5BR at most, so only 4BR will be retained and some weak 5BR will be reduced to 4BR.
Iâm just bouncing along reading, but in reality there really isnât a BR4 since most likely, they play BR5. I personally donât care what the player numbers are since we as players canât change it, NTM DF doesnât listen to us anyway. IMOP a lot can be gained by making BR5 a BR by itself Battle rating. Not many BR4 weapons are going to be used over BR5, so BR4 is a wasted dead BR level IMOP, and there absolutely should never be any faction uptiered two BR levels. If there arenât enough players, so be it as this is probably as good player numbers as DF is going to get, so DF might consider building better bots.
Off subject, but if DF wants to entice older players into coming back, or not to leave, they might want to reevaluate their decision to NOT release all the old squads that the player base has been requesting since Moses parted the Red sea. Give people what they want, or suffer the consequences. I managed a car dealership for 15 years in the US, and if I did not give the people what they wanted, they shopped somewhere else.
There is no somewhere else, no not even hell let loose, squad based is enlisted trump card. If lone fighter was the primary game play or it lacked vehicles it would have real competition. But enlisted is more a squad shooter despite how bad bots are
If you are not playing for the squad you are right enlisted is dead and you might as well play another better game.
