Why are you so persistent in making every faction have 5br?

(1) If you want each faction to have 5br, you must have corresponding full power fully automatic infantry weapons, such as FG42, T20, and AVT40. These can certainly be equipped through Void Technology, but this will make the game lose its historical significance
(2) By improving the room allocation mechanism(very important but difficult), it is possible to create factions with only 1-4br, but the rooms they enter is at most 4br, without matching 5br enemies and alliance factions
(3) This can provide reference for future technology trees in English, Italian, French, Chinese and etc, making the game both gaming and historical in nature
(4) It may also activate the 4-br attack queue of the current 1-5br factions
Even if it is really necessary to expand to the Cold War, it is necessary to unlock all 1-5br or 1-4br equipment before unlocking Cold War equipment in 6br.

2 Likes

Because high BR is where the big money are.

3 Likes

The root cause is the current BR system.

2 Likes

Undoubtedly, optimizing the room allocation mechanism in this way is equivalent to the previous line merging manipulation

However, Dark flow doesn’t know how to earn money and is still plagued by rider teams that low use and strongly correlate with maps

1 Like

i love the historical significance of t20. :+1:

most nations already have ±1 BR(except japan vs USA MM) when possible. if it is not possible you have BR3-5. when playerbase is not enough, then only question remains is do you want team with human and bots vs team full of humans or do you want to play against +2BR higher opponents.

not enough playerbase for another faction. at best they can introduce other faction as subfaction of current ones.

What is with people and still insisting this game is HA if it is clearly not"

“Why are you so persistent in making every faction have 5br?”
Because it would screw up the MM and would give people less incentive to play other factions knowing that they will at best face certain types of gear on the other side.

Dumb because those factions require other faction’s gear to be competitive.
France sucks and historical-wise, it is a complicated faction because France existed until 1940 and afterwards was split between Vichy and Free French forces, who mostly relied on German and Allied gear. (so much for history). French gear also sucks ass, especially their tanks.
The English would be incomplete BR5 without the American land lease, for the most part. So far, many proposed TTs rely heavily on GO, premium weapons and even US gear, which is unrealistic to consider.
China is copy+paste and apart from racist Chinese no one will long-term play them, especially since they only face Japan.
Italy is also pretty bad similar to France and UK.

More factions also creates more issues with the MM for something that can be solved by adding French stuff and squads to the US TT and call it a day.

Dunno, only the T20 is not historical here.

Yes because otherwise, one faction would be far easier to play if you wanna reach Cold War early.

2 Likes

If they didnt know, they would have run out of business a while ago.
Premiums are 9/10 gimmicks aimed to consoomers and main boos to collect stuff.

Show me one game that is historically accurate to the point that no one would be able to find anything to nitpick.

There literally isn’t a single one. It’s just matter of perspective, lol.

1 Like

Not relevant. All that matters as a measure “unit” is DF marketing and according to them their game only includes gear that was used in the respective campaign.
While the campaigns do not exist anymore, this standard was already broken in the CBT where the Panzer III B, Madsen or the BA-11 were present or in early OBT with the Jumbo, (outdated) Italian weapons in Normandy, the M2 or certain German plane models that were not deployed in the campaign.

3 Likes

What a horrific crime against history.

I guess Spielberg’s Band of Brothers is unhistorical trash as well just because they used M45 stuff in 1944 and so.

1 Like

Dont know your problem mate, they marketized something and it was wrong.

Well, they also portrayed some historical figures wrong like making some people Jewish when they were not Jewish or messing ranks up, so kinda.
But dunno, did Spielberg also state some DF bullshit like that “My movies are 100% historically accurate”? Dont know.

1 Like

But the fact is, the new pass was extended for half a month precisely because of gaijin’s new game active matter, not enlisted

The newly released English, Italian, and French systems will naturally be paired with American or German systems, rather than being matched separately.
Because European wars are not as monotonous as the Asian battlefield.
The current practice of directly stuffing British equipment into USA equipment is not suitable for stuffing equipment unique to British equipment in 1-3br, which may be too cumbersome.
These factions may not be able to achieve 5br, and 4br can only rely on copying from other factions, but 1-3br also has many unique equipment.

It is difficult or even unrealistic for these factions to have strength on 5br, and many can only replicate equipment from other factions on 4br.

However, 1-3br can still have many unique equipment of their own. Although I don’t have a deep understanding of infantry weapons, my knowledge of tanks and aircraft equipped from war thunder allows them to have high strength in 1-4br. And during World War II, many countries had semi-automatic rifles even China, but full power and fully automatic rifles were rare, like FG42.

(1) Don’t think that France lost its position after 1940, there are still many unique equipment in 1-3br, especially tanks and semi-automatic rifles; On the 4br, due to the assumption that the maximum number of rooms that can be accessed is 4, some unused 4br equipment obtained from US or German brands can be very powerful in French systems.

(2) A large part of the English and Italian are in the American and German. For the equipment of 4br, the British series can have Beaufighter, a series of Thompson, M4A1 (76) and so on; However, many Italian elements have not yet been reflected in the game, but the previous active version’s 20 round semi-automatic (Breda PG) is very strong, and the Tiger H1 can serve as the backbone of Italian intensity.

These factions can be bundled and matched on the European battlefield to alleviate the problem of player numbers (Except for the Asian battlefield)

These factions can be very strong on 1-4br and bring new vitality to the game.

1 Like

The historical significance of today’s games can only be maintained in a appropriately fictional state, such as the rudimentary MP4008 and VG2, which could have been manufactured in Germany as early as 1940.
I can even accept the appearance of MG42 in the Battle of Moscow, but I cannot accept the appearance of Tiger King H.

No, it was because graphic update was a mess due to old gen consoles.

That is why you dont make them standalone factions in the first place.

Not enough compared to a conplete TT and can be easily added to an existing TT.

Did you ever play the French? They are horrible and anything post Tier II is American and British gear, ehovj funny enough is the sole good stuff there.
The Italians are not much better and the Chinese dont have any domestic tanks to begin with.

Just another reason to no add them as unique faction.

Do you even know basic history? The Third Republic collapsed after Fall Gelb and Westfeldzug and most of its gear was in mainland France which was then used by the Germans.
If you look at the Free French forces they mostly used Springfields and British rifles and vehicles because their colonies barely had enough gear for them.

Again, you clearly never played French tanks. They are probably the worst low-tier tanks in War Thunder and tanks such as the B1 are pointless because in BR2 there are already Puma and J1 that can easily pen it.
And eho cared about stupid SA rifles?

giphy (1)
To get it straight: This faction is so good on its own, that it

  • barely reachs BR4
  • has crap tanks
  • and now relies on gear from other factions to be somewhat competitive and complete.

Maybe think twice.

And barely reach anything.

giphy (1)
Lol

giphy (1)

Then what is even the point of unique factions if their gesr can simply be put into existing TTs?

I am sure people are pleased to play Italy just to play the Tiger H1 again. Truly standalone and complete factions…

giphy (1)

1 Like

Yes, maybe, many vassal states’ weapons and equipment should only be a trouble for players on TTs,
just like in War Thunder where there are so many tanks and planes, but players only favor those few.
It is possible that the final listing will become an online weapon museum, just like War Thunder, and the attraction for players to play only exists in specific weapons

Yeah Lets talk about War Thunder and look at France for example:


Red = Not made during or before WW2
Purple = Land-lease
Yellow = ARL-44 in its final form was not designed until the end of World War II and no ARL had been constructed before the war ended either.

Tier IV is pointless because it is entirely relying on Cold War tanks and the M26 was issued to France after World War II iirc.

So if we go really pure French, we are left with 16 low tier tanks that barely reach BR2, 13 if we exclude SPAAs. If we include land-leased tanks, we have over 50% more tanks, which shows how bad the French TT would be on its own (assuming that we would all of those tanks which, given the situation, would make sense). And akmost all of those tanks are required to make France reach BR3 and 4, making it even worse.
Really, if one third of your 24 tanks are American and British tanks, it only asks you more why not just add French tanks to the US TT.

Similar case for Italy
image
Nothing reaches BR3 excluding for two SPGs, which no one realy crawls for. 23 tanks isnt that impressive if most of them are inflating BR1. And unlike France, the Italian land-lease is divided into German- and Allied-alligned Italys, further limiting Italy in a potential TT.

China is the best
Screenshot (195)
Not even gonna bother to mark stuff. All Chinese-made stuff is Cold-War stuff and lots of land-leased tanks from the US and Soviet Russia were supplied during the second phase of the Civil War and the Korea War, thus making it redundant for WW2 Enlisted.

Only British tank TT is “fine” but does not change the fact that their tanks have awful armour in higher BRs and awful shells, especially since DF always gives us the worst shells for Allied and German tanks.

1 Like