Is that confirmed , taht GBritain doesn´t get an own tree? Do you have a link for that.
In fact GBritain would be the easiest tree to add - you dont even have to split the playerbase as GBritain
would still play on the same maps as USA.
For Italy it would be a little tougher as they dont have Tier 4 or 5 equipment .(except if you just stop at Tier 3)
2 Likes
^this^
In War Thunder British tanks suck, I agree. But the great thing about Enlisted is we get a better chance at using tanks for what they were designed for. Like the M4A3 in WT sucks (especially due to uptiers) but in Enlisted is really good as an infantry support tank.
British tanks were designed around a doctrine of infantry support, hence the slow speed so infantry could keep up. Id like a Mathilda tank in game, partly because its what Australians used, but also it would be quite good I think.
Heavily armoured and has cannon and machine gun for anti infantry which is the main thing tanks do in Enlisted. I have read the autobiography of German panzer commander Hans Von Luck where he mentions how powerful the Mathilda tanks were in the early days of the desert war, unless the Germans could get their 88s to the front.
The same goes for the Churchill and others. The Cromwell and Comet are also quite capable tanks.
It is true British tanks are slow, but in Enlisted that doesnt matter, I can barely get above 15km/h in most maps due to the terrain and all the junk one has to dodge.
Also, why shouldnt British tanks be added but other content is fine? Lots of people would like British tanks in game. If we went with your logic we would never add anything new to Enlisted.
2 Likes
Which is why you won’t see them.
LOL?? Why wouldnt they put them in an infantry-based game as infantry support? What’s the difference here then between an M4A2 and a Mathilda tank?
1 Like
Then there is little point for dev to separate them anyway.