I just think that manual and semi-automatic can hardly play a positive role in most battles.
Then you can change the topic to suicide attacks or argue about skills.
Is this how you argue?
but
Thank you all for your arguments.
Now I know what kind of people the 70% of losers in every game are like.
Compared with using technology and equipment
They are better at quibbling, changing the subject, and discriminating against other players.
No wonder there are so many stinky monkeys and parasites in this game
Considering that asking you to prove the correctness of your arguments is almost impossible
Have any of you ever thought about poisoning other games?
CS or Dou Zhen Agent should be suitable for some of you.
My lower rated German squads win about 80% of the time, it’s my allies that have been taking it up the butt big time for the past 6 months in the lower rated levels, and really in all levels. The only level that I play that is not successful with the Germans is level 5, but I don’t play a lot with them at that level, I almost always play allies at level 5.
You cant use bolt actions to the point you cant even spell them correctly. Case closed. Further evidences? Suicide bombing and AP mine spam aka skillless. Everyone can do that but not everyone can use a bolt-action rifle.
I actually love the bolt action rifle - I mean, I don’t love to depend on it, but getting a series of 10 or more kills off in a row with one at medium range has a sweetness nothing can match.
Seriously? We must be in very different matches or time zones then. It’s not a baseless accusation, first off, since I’m not the only one experiencing this - you see it on Reddit and you see people agreeing even on this thread.
Plus, I have screen shots from both Russian and American sides vs. German lower tier. And it’s not like I screencap every win/loss, but just the most ridiculous ones. You know, where you might see 7 out of 10 German players in ONE match that are colonel and above and only 3 or less on the other side.
It’s almost NEVER the other way around, where there’s an even a similar amount of colonel or above or even crazier, where it’s more colonels or above on the allied side. I do occasionally see a Russian win where they had more of the skilled players. But it’s a lot more rare.
I actually have the screenshots. Here’s just a couple - and this is from the more recent battlepass (in some ways, it’s kind of shocking just how fast some players have made it up the ranking charts).
Because some people actually like more the meta/equipment of BR II and III, this is also a thing in WT these 2 games are not like “World of X” where the only playable stuff is at high tier.
The problem is with the “good” player population that likes to flock every season to the faction with more WR%
Soviets got the T-34- and a surge of players, so the babyrage germany mains all fled BR5. Currently getting repeatedly automatched into BR5 germany and having nice, hard fought matches
Yes, my own experience (pre-T34-100 for the most part) was as a BR5 Germany, we won 60% of the time. Nothing like the 80% or so that they win in BRI-II of course. But, it’s still an edge. I only play it b/c some of the people I play with favor it.
Unlucky? I guess that’s what you can call it. Obviously, no one tried to suicide onto him (which, if you think about it, should not even be a tactic. I mean, seriously - if that’s part of the “game design” that’s some seriously crappy game design).
All I know, is I didn’t feel like having any more of the same, and if others felt like I did, then the American side sucked all night. Normally, I’d stick it out, but I had a 50% bonus on 6 more games from the battlepass and I didn’t feel like wasting it on losses.
I’m not a dev, so I can’t explain why the Russians end up with different ratios - maybe the maps are more favorable and the Germans avoid them. Ended up going 2-2 with the Russians vs. the Germans, and the matches were a lot closer (obviously).