Is this some kind of a clan teamwork at the forum? Why write almost the same as your friend? I know I’m talking about - AVT is much more accurate weapon - I make a good shots with it at the distance. With AVS I cant.
Sure you 45 can play even with a Kar98 at br 5. But don’t advise to common players something about an issue will ya
You could ask for more opinions on the weapon first, see how other people feel about it. You will find out that the AVS is anything but innacurate.
I agree, more content is good. But that doesn’t mean the new content has to be better than anything that was released before. We are talking about power creep here.
Again, you are focusing on the ONE thing that FG 42 has an advantage in, and you want to take that away / minimize it aswell. You should understand that your weapon is not supposed to be best at everything. Yes, the FG 42 is better in close quarters, and that’s it. Everything else, you name it, it’s worse, way worse than the current avs right now
I speak with a real veterans of this game and heard the same as I feel. If I will need to know how the rokies feel - I do.
I’m talking about option to chose. Axis now have this option - between FG42 and FG42II. AVT 40-20 is a way better then AVS, so let the factions have this right - to decide.
As I say AVS less effective at the distance then AVT 40-20. So FG is better at close distance and AVS is less effective at long range. That’s my opinion
Nope, they just gave me to look at this post. Maybe us having the same comment is because it is true.
So with your thinking right now. Should SMGs then be buffed? Just because I use an SMG at mid-far range, I blame the SMG for being trash. Not because I am foolish to use a weapon that is not made for mid to far range. So Plz buff SMG.
Hmm I cant seem to time explosive packs properly as well. Surely the explosive pack is defective, I think we should have a gigantic timer that helps me countdown to 6s. Or maybe bring back to function that automatically throws it before exploding?
If you wanna bring up PERSONAL accounts from Soldiers, that like saying we should therefore take biased and unresearched recounts. That is like going to take a recount from the Amercian Soldiers from Korean War. The issue proposed was that the Chinese Army Clothing was armour, just because they didn’t die after 1 shot. So then should we be taking in these kind of accounts?
Do you see how absurd claims can be used to turn any arguments and suggestions into irrational ones
Why then in BR 5 do I see almost EVERY BR 5 game Axis side, people who have access to both options, just decide to use the FG42II?, just because there is an option to use. Doesnt mean it should. That is like saying using an AR is an option in competitive, but just because it is, doesnt mean it will be used.
So now we have an option to choose - which weapon to play with for axis - FG42II or FG42. I played against RenDeyl your boyo and he was armed with FG 42. Pretty effective I must say.
What option we have for soviets - more accurate AVT with a 5 more rounds. Or little higher ROF AVS but less aqurate and less rounds. What should I choose? Hmm there is no option now at all
Stop tunnel visioning into the fact that the FG42 has a high RoF and a 20 round mag. It literally is has 0.25 dispersion compared to 0.18 which is a HUGE DIFFERENCE. U will literally miss 1/4 of your shots because of this, making the effective magazine size lesser.
It is clear your “5 Years” of playing this game didn’t help with ur ability to analyze guns or have game knowledge
If u want to know even the difference on why the mag size is the same for the FG42II and FG42. It is because the FG42II has 0.22 dispersion, compared to 0.25 dispersion on the FG 42.
Let us ignore the fact that the AVT and AVS has higher Bullet Velocity which matters in mid-long ranges. And helps me who has 200 ping avg, because that means less time to kill. And also that for hipfire, the AVT/AVS has 15.0 spread increase vs FG42II/FG42 has 23.0 spread increase? Maybe look more at all the stats of the weapon before being too quick to point out the cons of guns. Be quick to listen, slow to talk, and slow to anger
That’s funny how you took to go personally, but I wouldn’t do that
Who am I if I try to push newbies? Catch my drift?
So now avt for 20 rounds away better weapon. I just need to have an option - took higher rate of fire, but less accurate AVS for 20 rounds or better accuracy and less rate of fire avt for 20 rounds and that’s fair enough.
I have a right to talk about everything in this game because I know it and I have some experience. if you come here recently, just don’t start to the veterans. That’s my advice to you.
All this stuff you write - can make you suggest to upgrade fg or something. Or add something else than f like zh 29 with autofire. I wouldn’t mind do it. I decided to make some research about Аvs-36. Because I feel it will be good option a good opportunity to choose. More content is good for sure
Please just because ur a veteran doesnt mean u have rights as well. If u wanna pull such nonsense this defeats the point of a debate. Why not refer to this Enlisted Resource - Google Spreadsheets
for information on Actual Gun Stats in the game. Given and made by a Enlisted Helper
why then say just cause ur a veteran, u have a better say then i do. I am pretty sure if I link this thread on the clan hub discord server, other competitive players would agree with my statement. Be consistent with ur argument
Don’t put in my words, something that I didnt say. I’m a veteran and I have a right to say as well as you as well as everybody. I know this game a little more that’s true. And it’s only an opinion anyway.