Um, no. The developers justified fatigue by the movement dispersion, which the Mg42 also has the highest in the game.
Yes, but it is better than the M9 in that aspect too, making it just strictly better. Panzerfaust 100 to M9 is asymmetrical balance, Panzerschreck to M9 is just the M9 being strictly inferior.
What difference does it make if the m9 will pierce German tanks without a problem, just as panzerschek does American tanks?
200mm or 2000, what difference does it make if the biggest armor in the Normandy Jumbo in the forehead of the turret is about 180
If the bazooka has an M6A3 projectile, it will penetrate 120mm of armor. This is enough for the tiger and panther with their 80-100mm of armor in the thickest places.
Because the M9 won’t be able to insta pen everything at any angle even at point blank, while both the Panzerfaust 100 and the Panzerschreck will be able too, and the Panzershrek being able to do it at any range. The Panzerfaust will need to close a bit of distance to do that, making it more balanced.
if they wanted this type of balance the sturmpistole would destroy Sherman at full throttle, and the anti-tank rifles with each shot would kill a tanker, the developers like the balance that is good for them not us, remind this
Panzerschrek could have had four missiles instead of six. I think that would have been fine.
In any case, the 120mm is a forehead penetration of any axis tanks. I think this is more than enough.
In fact, I really see no reason not to add Panzerschrek.
it is in the images in the game and is perfect in Normandy, since there can be an m9 bazooka.
It can’t be in Berlin due to the pointlessness in view of the small distances on the maps and the lack of an analog in the USSR.
In fact, I’m 90% sure we’ll see it in Normandy and I’m glad we did.
The devs said they wouldn’t do balance changes by ammo anymore, and although there are a few exceptions with the sniper MkB 42 and AVT 40, they are sticking to what they have standardized most of the time and they should stick to it. Balancing by ammo is an awful idea.
Panzerschrek is in berlin from the cbt, they don’t have add him because muuuu lv 40 probably, and no the panzerschrek probably never appear in normandy if we follow weapon unlock order the next one is panzerfaust 100 and for american something wo can work at 50m
If so, it’s awful crap and stupid. There’s literally no point in a panzershrek missile if the fight is in the city at 20-30 meters.
I’m going to hope I’m right, otherwise it’s going to disappoint me.
You got disappointed
1 Like
sad. However, I will hope and promote the idea of the m9 and Panzershrek.
I just don’t understand what the USSR will get in Berlin in response. Panzerschreck too? The best balance of the millennium when all grenade launchers are the same?
Panzerschrek ussr use him in cbt 
Unfortunately in battle of Berlin USSR doesn’t have its own AT launcher. In CBT we haev Panzerschreck trophy
1 Like
incredibly boring. Instead of an m9 and a Panzerschreck (like 43 instead of 54, which would be fine), we get just two Panzerschrecks after two packs of two Panzerfausts.
Ussr in berlin dont have a proper AT luncher so they used the one of the german they captured after the fall of german line and their desperete retreat at berlin
This is good, at least a weapon used by both sides cannot be nerfed for no reason because it could piss off ppl from both sides. But if you nerf something like MP43 only Axis players would care
I’m well aware of the historical aspect, but first of all Panzerschreck was not used by USSR soldiers (at least at least somewhat visibly, like Panzerfaust), and secondly I just said that the same weapon is boring.
This did not prevent the developers from introducing a weakened PCA for the Axis as a “trophy” in Stalingrad ))))))))))))
1 Like