Just talk,enjoy it and have fun!
1 Like
Is this Wieglow bait?
5 Likes
sorry but I dont know what you mean
Advantages over hell let loose:
- real maps instead of empty fields
- gameplay oriented towards playing objective instead of sniping each other dicks
- cooperation instead of griefing and teamkilling:
- support for mods and custom games
- players having fun instead of players working as a cannon fodder for snipers / tanks / artillery
Disadvantages - has none 
I played HLL and it is just not that fun anymore. Enlisted is an actual fun game while Hell Let Loose is a wannabe milsim games that keeps going downhill every time a new patch is release.
3 Likes
Enlisted plus:
- a lot of gear, probably the most in any ww2 shooter ever
- f2p
- a lot of events
Enlisted mixed:
- supports mods but it’s so lackluster I won’t count it as plus
Enlisted minus:
- bugs
- balance issues
- clunky
- bad quality of players
- bad/no teamplay
HLL plus:
- good teamplay
- more historical and realistic than bf and enl
- the best, most ww2 atmosphere out of the 3
HLL minus:
- it’s slower game than both enl and bf, not really a minus but depends on what you are looking for
- clunky
- meh amount of gear
- gear is locked to certain clases and clases are available in limited numbers
- no player controled planes
BF plus:
- high quality of textures and animations
- infantry gear isn’t locked to countries
- big population
- less trolls than in enl and hll
BF minus:
- no eastern front, big sad
- meh ammount of gear
- doesn’t really feel like ww2, it just has ww2 skin
- cheaters
Overall:
BF: great for pure chaos and fun
HLL: great for ww2 feel
Enlisted: kind of a mix of both and f2p (both good and bad)
2 Likes
Those are different game for a different audience
-
Hell and PS, are for who want a mil-sim in the ww2 like was the old iron front: liberation 1944
-
Battlefield is for players who like a sandbox battle field were they can do whatever they want
-
Enlisted sit in the middle for who want an arcady sandbox experience but without battlefield exaggeration
In the end everyone have the game they like and personally I love play easy red 2 during the Sunday (if im not playing genshin or HSR new update/event) as I like play Enlisted time to time
4 Likes
Have you even played those games? Because this is 100% BS.
On the forum you can see a lot of complainins about ppl not playing the objective.
Griefing happens also all the time (see posts about badly placed rallies or barbed wire) though recently it got much better.
Countless and never ending posts about planes/tanks being too strong.
But nah, enlisted is best game ever. Literalry 0 issues. At least untill I keep my eyes closed.
I had above 1000 hours in hll, but stopped playing when I found Enlisted.
I decided that I will rather give Gaijin all my money than work as a cannon fodder for Alpine Snipers and other “content creators” 
Great.
How does it justify being blind to obvious problems enlisted has? It’s a very unhealthy thing to do, both for you ans for the game.
Enlisted has a way better community/playerbase, both in terms of skill and intelligence. Additionally, the Enlisted community is incredibly friendly.
3 Likes
Lol!
A fellow satire??? I know you want to trigger someone, and I LOVE IT!!! 
Well, with all his bug at least Enlisted don’t crash consistently after a game of like 40 min lol.
HLL is a joke on console.
Anyway. HLL and Enlisted are two different games and I am tired of comparing apples to pineapples. HnG is closer to Enlisted if you exclude RTS since it is optional and was suffering from imbalance anyways. BFV might also work but the issue is that the game feels empty in terms of content.
I just make bold general statements about the “general” competition.
Pro:
- Squad system (in theory)
- Combined arms
- Engineer system
Con: - Most stuff is poorly done or outright bugged
- Maps are the second-worst I have ever played
- Progress system
- MM system is still too rough
- Poor economic system
- 3,4 and 5 make the game outright awful for newbies
2 Likes
Well none of them are good but I like Enlisted more than others because of the content (There are tons of weapons)
Here is my opinion best WW2 game is/was Cod world at war , it was gritty and campaign shows brutalities that were committed by every side as soviets you kill German soldiers that surrendered by throwing Molotov
Germans check soviet soldiers and shoot their dead body
Americans killing Japanese with flamethrower
And first American mission where Japanese torture you
And multiplayer was dark and gritty but it was also fun anyhow that’s my opinion
3 Likes
As a player who likes to trash the game often in this forum, i have bolder claim;
-this game can surpass any other current ones. All it needs is bigger maps and better bots
2 Likes
I watch this on videos before,I love that
I think these three games have different positioning
BFV has strong entertainment value and can be understood as a regular shooting game with only World War II weapons. This uniqueness and its beautiful graphics attract many players who are not interested in World War II history, which is why BFV’s non realism (such as players acting like Superman in battle)
HLL is very realistic, just like a real war, because the purpose of this game itself is to make people hate war, so players may not have a good feeling, but it is very realistic, just like real!
I personally feel that Enlisted is different from the previous two. HLL and BFV are both fighting on a large battlefield, which may be more in line with the situation of the Western Front. Enlisted is a small battlefield where each player leads a small team, so the population density in the area is high, which is very suitable for fighting in small areas. That’s right, this is the situation of Stalingrad and Berlin! The Enlisted city campaign shown is incomparable to the other two!
I personally enjoy playing Enlisted, as it is both realistic and has a certain level of playability
Enlisted has bots so all the games feel fleshed out, thats what first made me interested in the game and will always keep me playing as long as I can.
Although the older (better) Battlefield games had bots, they got rid of them around the same time they got rid of mod support in their games. They made a decision to copy Call of Duty with their Bad Company trash, but with console success they focused the main franchise on making the mainstream Battlefield games more like EA’s sports franchises like FIFA where they release a new game every two years with a few map packs and but only support it until the next games comes out in two years. The decision was made to get rid of the bots and stop AI development because AI meant only added replay value to their games (so people would be less likely to move to the next game), and instead they focused on truly awful linear single player campaigns, again copying Call of Duty.
When BF4 came out people complained it was too similar to BF3 but with better lighting, so they made BF Hardline and no one played it cause cops are boring. Then they made Battlefield 1 which was liked by some but suffered from excessively dark and dreary maps and a very low FOV emphasizing how EA/Dice was not playing the games they were making and not planning on supporting them for years after release. By the time Battlefield 5 came out, it had cyborg feminist protagonists in a game which is supposed to be about generic soldier classes, and it was a lame joke, although to their credit they supported FOV’s up to 120, and the maps were brighter and more colorful in general which was good for EA/Dice. Then Battlefield 2042 came out and although it had bots (and I had some limited fun playing against the bots, even in the portal with the old BF1942 maps) the whole entire base game was totally awful from top to bottom and proved that Battlefield is a dead franchise forever. Any talent is gone from EA/Dice and the next installment is already emphasizing the “live service” scam aspect aka the game will be replaced in 2 years by a shittier one and support will stop.
I bought Hell Let Loose and it is a total scam game with absolutely no bots or offline mode whatsoever other then a very simple target range. With no bots or any development into AI your games will be totally based on who is playing at the same time as you. It has large maps which have potential if they were full of bots but they are kind of a joke playing against two guys on the enemy team and one other guy on your team. Having gigantic maps actually make the game quite silly at that point. Also you have to play up front for HLL, there is no way to “demo” the game to see if it is good or if it sucks, you have to pay $65 up front to just see that it is a game that had potential but is mostly empty and you can not just pick up and play it when you want to, even at 2 in the morning cause there will not be anyone else playing. HLL is puttering out and dying because it is reliant on a community that they have pissed off and alienated and has better options like Enlisted which always has full games. HLL is also a very chatty game but everyone sounds like dorks so it actually harms the WW2 immersion.
I don’t mean to sound anti social (lol) but bots are better then other players more often then not and Enlisted spends a lot of time developing their AI to move around their complex maps, build rallies, call in artillery, etc., and they seem to be always updating the AI and concentrating on improving it. This means the game has a lot longer lifespan even if short sighted people do not realize it. I still have Red Orchestra 2 installed cause I can load up that old game and play it with bots whenever I like. That is a game that has long term value.
1 Like