Im really upset about the thompson going to br2. I have spent so much money on br2 guns that are now obsolete.
5 Likes
Just keep using them?
1 Like
What br2 machine gun do you think is so much better? The only other comparable one is the charleton automatic. So why is saying the m26 is one of the best so funny?
According to true stats… pretty much anything.
I think the whole BR thing is absolutely retarded, to begin with. I only wanted to play Tunisia and Normandy. Absolutely hate the eastern front. Makes me want to press quit and has kept me away months at a time from paying for the game. Whoever runs your decisions needs to be fired or be assigned a nanny, and strictly sign off on things. Stop changing the game for worse with every single damned update!
I don’t normally participate or talk on forums. And you won’t listen. But I am very sick of this shit. Just stop. And stop being so biased in favor of soviets. Every change they got was in their favor. As usually, germany got nerfed. Germany wins because the dumb kids like the americans and the retarded folks ro the east wants to play soviet and yell cyka blyat. So they lose no matter what. But their stuff is generally better in many cases already. Except for the japanese. Their tech tree is appallingly bad.
Suggestion: DUMP the five tiers. Have three wider ones. Early war. Middle War and Late War. And PLEASE, oh PLEASE make it possible at least for premium to NEVER EVER see the general misery-inducing maps of the eastern front and Berlin. I want deeply to only play Tunisia and Normandy.
2 Likes
Alot of us don’t like the mag ontop. So purely from that perspective alone the Charlton, m26, mg13, are the best option. The chatellerault is my favorite in the top mounted mag options.
Why would someone use the bsa thompson or even the usmc tommy squad or the hyde now over m1a1 tommy?
Sights maybe? Not with almost double the mag size
For the same reason why some people intentionally use PTRS in BRV.
This isn’t quite the same. The experience from shooting an m1a1 and bsa thompson is almost the same just with one having 40+% less bullets in mag
It’s more like why bring a PTRD when you can bring the PTRS. No one is bringing the PTRD into br5, can guarantee that.
1 Like
br3 will play with br5 in new vision？Last two weeks almost every br3 battle of USSR can meet Tighr King and FG42 II
No. They said br5 will be locked off from br3
1 Like
Yes it is.
People do it for fun or historical reasons, not because they need to only play the best of the best.
Yeah I don’t understand why they didn’t move them to BR 1 and move the BR 3 BF109 to BR 2. They moved the FW190 from BR 3 making the FW already in BR 2 completely redundant. x4 20mm at BR 2 is a bit too crazy.
And here we have the least angry Axis main
1 Like
Very happy with the BR balancing changes to Japan! Gonna have to spend a hot minute reconfiguring my squads and what guns they have. I wonder what might take the place of their BR4 rifle when the time comes. I hope it’s something cool!
Also love the new profile pic @James_Grove
7 Likes
You clearly aren’t hearing what i said. I understand people may bring the ptrs into 5 because its fun to use as a sniper. Its also really strong against at guns and such. But its not the same because a br5 at launcher offers a completely different experience that you cannot have with a ptrs which is a low tier gun. So the reasoning of bringing in a bsa tommy gun (br2) because it’s fun doesn’t make any damn sense, because the “fun” factor is the same as a m1a1 tommy at br2. They are the same gun just one is now worse. How hard is that to understand? A more comparable statement would be why would someone bring in a ptrd into tier 5 when they have the ptrs to bring into tier 5. No one does that nor would want to because the ptrs offers the same “fun” experience as the ptrd in br5 but in a much better way.
Germany needs some BR 2 premium SMGs to move to BR 1. MP28 extended magazine and MP18 should both be BR 1.
3 Likes
No because if fun is selective. It is even the primary joke of gold order guns.
I also dont see the reason caring so much for a gold order weapon to begin with which are not supposed to play role in balance questions beyond not overperforming. They are mere gimmick guns you usually buy if you want to mess around with them or are a hoarder whale.
So dunny why people who bought the BSA to own and play with the BSA should care so much about a downgraded Thompsons, especially since the Thompson was already present in old Tunisia campaign when the BSA was around.
1 Like
Meaningless fiddling