- yes to this one
- I really would like to see it, but sorry: NO → compared to other snipers on BR II it would be far stronger
- maybe
agree, I don’t see the sense here
to all other suggestions:
no - sorry 
3 Likes
Only thing I would change, (other than controversial pz3N that should remain br2, like T28 and M8)
The Uragan smg. There’s no way this should be as low as br2, and as such, should be br3 Imo.
Here’s comparable smgs in axis arsenal that are (will be) br3:
The only advantage those have over the Uragan, is they have a bit more bullets per magazine. The Uragan is better than them in all other aspects (Velocity, similar or better handling, WAY higher rof, similar damage…)
Uragan should be br3. It’s not a low br2 gun.
9 Likes
still heat… i rather prefer my old pz IIIn on 2 br to molest infantry
1 Like
Uragan will have 0.81 dispersion based on its stat card, which nerfs a little but not enough to justify BR2.
3 Likes
that is why skill issue people asked devs to take it away, but worry not my friend because you can continue with Pz IV F1!
2 Likes
Will it be the usual “soviet bias” dispersion ppsh41(box) has, or genuine dispersion? 
Uragan should be br3
4 Likes
PZ IV F1 sucks ass in armor department
1 Like
it does, but so does 98% of your enemies at this game.
Awake again.
Motor cycles not considered for BR 1?
7 Likes
- pz3n . He became stronger by only 3 points. Yes, no armor was added. but his new shells and his rate of fire kills any enemy tank instantly. just an annihilation machine. All that remains is to replace the useless armor-piercing bombs with land mines, and this is literally the strongest tank of the 3rd br.
- A few tips. they already had the best autowind of the game, now it has become even more powerful. they already had the strongest Fedorov machine gun, it became generally gorgeous. The Fedorov machine gun became the same, plus it received a 4 rating. this is OK, since the mg 42 early and mg 45 are literally the best 4 br machine guns and their Soviet antipode has come to them. It won’t help the soviets, there’s a hotbed of weak players, but individual players will be happy.
1 Like
BR Changes to Bf 109 F-1 and Bf 109 F-2 (BR II → BR I)
justification:
- Bf 109 F-1 has only 1 x 20mm machine canon with 90 rounds and less climb rate then Bf 109 E-7/U2 (nearly 3m/s)
- Bf 109 F-1 has only 1 x 15mm machine canon with 200 rounds and less climb rate then Bf 109 E-7/U2 (nearly 3m/s)
- the Bf 109 E-7/U2 on BR I has 2 x 20mm machine guns with 120 rounds + 1000 rounds more with 7,92mm
→ the only difference: having minimal better turn rate (0,27sec) and being a little bit faster (18km/h / 11mph) but having on the other side worse armament shouldn’t be a reason to put Bf 109 F-1 and Bf 109 F-2 on BR II
2 suggestions:
- put Bf 109 F-1 and Bf 109 F-2 on BR I and Bf 109 E-7/U2 on BR II
or and that’s what I would recommened: - put Bf 109 F-1 and Bf 109 F-2 on BR I and put it in a folder together with Bf 109 E-7/U2
3 Likes
Good enough for me, the shit I used has been affected positively whilst the rest of the negative changes are all on shit that I never bother to use in the first place.
I couldn’t figure out accurate single dropping with the Ju-188, but I can understand the reasoning.
Shame though, I’ll have to figure out where I can relocate this crew
1 Like
Para troopers 
3 Likes
until KV-1 shows to rape all
1 Like
I must just conclude Battle Rating is THE most Bad.
Here we are once again, after having been bored with this in WT now in Enlisted…
latest BR changes!! wow and al the drama and experts trying to argue over what rating up or down it deserves… pointless and tiresome, especially since its so flawed and doesn’t include several factors that would be meaningful (as in role, year etc).
At the end of day it’s skills from the operator behind the screen, the situational awareness, and luck.
It’s who cmoes on top in most advatageous position (by putting himself there) and who comes upon who first. Kar98 or StG44 only changes matter of engagement, i.e range and surroundings, attack defence etc.
I hate BR…
You could make it better and take more aspects in consideration though and would be atleast decent.
but whole idea of having someone put a number that is supposed to reflect because perceived power versus others, and then have the general mass of amateurs give feedback that adjusts that imaginary numbers is flawed at best…
and for me importantly immersion breaking…
Overall I think a lot of the changes are good. Here’s some feedback however:
30 round Thompsons should stick to BR 3. There’s a lot of BR 2 sub machine guns for allies, including 20rd thompson variants which this would obsolete with very minor differences to the other BR 3 thompsons. Please reconsider.
SU-85 → Should be BR 3. It’s pretty much comparable to stug F III. Medium armor casemate TDs should be downtiered.
Luftfaust should be BR 3. It’s a meme gun.
Any chance to consider the PPD-29 downtier to 3 or is it too OP?
6 Likes
Seems were all gonna have to re adjust our squads and loadouts after the update.
1 Like
My br2 germany (all 11 slots) is completely filled with top tier equipment. You gotta stop with all the drama. I know it’s hard.
-mas38 was very suitable for br3 then out of no where it got put in br2. Crazy good
-
kp26 again was very suitable for br3, out of no where it got put in br2.
-
iar will forever be the best all around low tier fighter
-
pziii m still at br2 and has 70mm of frontal armor everywhere. Like what?
-
75mm puma short barrel with heat rounds…joking right? This thing is so fun and so overpowered.
-
br2 assault rifles…
-
lahti m/26 is absolutely one of the best machine guns in game at br2
-
mg13 is by far the best tech tree br2 machine gun
-
berretta m38 is absolutely amazing in low tier and now they just downtiered another version of it
-
mp35 is crazy good
-
mp719 is crazy good
-
pavesi m42 is an amazing rifle at br2
-
berretta 1918 is one of my favorites
As you can see my br2 germany is absolutely stacked.
2 Likes
10 Likes