Yes, yes. Especially before the merger.
Seriously what are you guys on about?
WIll removing body armor make infantry weaker? Will removing TIger 2 make german tanks weaker? Maybe no shit sherlock capabilities removed lower win %?
Do soviets have a 1.5ton bomber? Do they have a fast reload heavy tank? Rocket plane at high BR?
Things arent being removed from the game, theyre being added.
Stop crying about ur favorite thing that triggers you and post your main weaker win % than ur enemies - if ur an Axis main show me how your Soviet lineup on average has a higher WR than ur main Axis lineup and vice versa
Ill wait
USSR has the best infantry weapons in the game plus body armor to survive for longer, only their tanks are are weaker but i would rather take AS-44 or RD-44 or Thompson 100 or PPSH-41 squads than a single KT that dies in 1-3 hits from anything i never have problem with them in my t-34-100 or when i’m carrying panzerfaust i just see them as a silver piñata.
Honestly theyre both fine.
Re Armor bitching:
Id personally like more body armor / ways of increasing survivability in game, I brought up Medic 2 squad with Medic APCs that resurrect lost squad members as further increasing TTK (time to kill)
Historically its Soviets and Japs that issued body armor at scale. Everybody else should have then on premium + event squads, otherwise its just a boogey man of ppl afraid to leave their King tiger. Its prob a better use of time to rally for Japan having their body armor since again, were adding content to game, not removing it.
As for AVT 20-25 rd?
You can right now main AVS/AVT combo on riflemen, with quick switch it basically works like a 30rd clip - you cant do that with FG42s, so sure it would be nice to see, but than my Soviet dual wielding riflemen are pushing 40rd clips FUNCTIONALLY.
But that is just mot really true though.
I play all faction and by FAR Americans are worst to play. They have the bad maps and bad player base.
Lol where do those Russian speakers come from?
If you personally like it, play it. But your wishes do not affect reality.
yes
A little.
I don’t understand you. I’m not a native English speaker.
soon
generally or on BR5? You are asking too abstract questions.
no
something unclear again. Do you need my statistics?
enjoy. Why am I a mainer there?
That’s why top players don’t use it. It makes sense.
this is such stupid argument. game is not any vs any and there are numerous reasons on why not to use soviets in such match and have mentioned some of them above.
also whole game is not based on balance between AVT40 vs fg42. tell me do soviets have advantage on BR2 with pps42/43 vs mp40? what about soviets with body armor on same BR?
Where are those top players anyways?
Imaginary “top players” are weaklings and trying to find excuses for their bad gameplay skills they just want to get carried by dedicated German players that’s why they are picking Germany. In their mind they see KT murdering 100 people in a single HE shell, that fake German bias that doesn’t exist in game but only in their imagination since in real game 1-3 panzerfaust rockets and that KT is a history.
Mate, first, stop being so overly derisive,
Second, its a bit of a stretch to say Sovjet are struggeling. Especially when we are talking about weapons like cmon. I agree that the silly Germans mains should stop nagging about ‘Soviet bias’ because thats a bunch of bullshit. But now your just doing the same, its like a reverse-‘soviet bais’.
You know why Soviet does not win? because they lack players. Not because of the weapons, thats just such nonsence.
and what are the reasons? You are going to list them, aren’t you?
In general, parity is most likely.
and they lack players, why? Because the weapons are crap?
I apologize. I had no malicious intent.
but when I read something like this, it’s hard for me not to die laughing and be serious.
Amazing example of “top tier” players that has been proven on multiple occasion to cheating but DF don’t care. Take cheats away from U45N and from certain dude with a nickname starting on A in the other clan that i called few days ago and they would be below console kids.
Stills too weak
Give it more bayonets
It’s funny to see that the URRS have adventages in almost everything aspect (when we are reffering to infantery)
But they cry for their SF… Even more than all the cries americans made asking for a decent br 5 smg and Germany with the damm belt fed mg too… And probably Even more than all the playerbase of Japan asking for… Little of more of attention to their stuff…
Federov avtomat is a SF in the smg slot just change the magazine to 20 bullets if aviable and move it to the rifle categorization
nah… both pps have advantage. mp40 is better within 15m against vitality, but pps is better against enemy without vitality(which is majority of players/bots on BR2) and it is better at engagements over 15m. if you add body armor pps have overwhelming advantage over mp40 cause even that slight advantage within 15m is lost.