mathematic never lies
i have tried every army at different brs so far.
My observation is; merge is a heyday for soviets and japan particulary at low br.
lets say brs dont exist
player numbers distribution is totally equal for every 4 side (%25 for each)
and all nations have same proportion of veterans and newbies
we still have a problem
western allies and european axis strecht thin.
meanwhile japanese and soviet just deal with 1 front against 1 oppenent
we need to dilute japanese and soviet playerbase by make them fight each other
6 Likes
Only 2 BRs allowed in Manchuria - 1 and 5! 
Khalkhin Gol would be better:
(early war equipment)
2 Likes
Khalkin/Manchuria - tomatoes/tomatoes
2 Likes
Manchuria fits BR1-4 pretty well tbh, though it would really be good to limit both Pacific and potential Manchuria to BR1-3 instead
1 Like
Rework every current map to make them playable and make them look like the real battle. That will give Enlisted a firm foundation when developing further maps.
Yeah, because BR2 smgs like pps-42 and pps-43 are early equipment.
Nah, Manchuria is definitely better idea at this point. Since the early/late equipment is completely mixed up anyway.
God I wish, @LM4_Luna and I actually set up a concept for a Manchuria campaign for the old system, shouldn’t be too hard to adapt into the new BR system imo.
And yes we included plenty gear that would make Japan still viable to play against Soviet equipment.
If you want to take a look: Invasion of Manchuria (Operation August Storm), USSR/Japan (campaign draft)
1 Like