I doubt no one ever claimed anything else, just the AVT / AVS is better.
As usual with sovjet wheelchair assistances.
A tank thats easier to destroy than BR3 sovjet KV.
I doubt no one ever claimed anything else, just the AVT / AVS is better.
As usual with sovjet wheelchair assistances.
A tank thats easier to destroy than BR3 sovjet KV.
Ah I see you are new player, anyway. APHE works wonders shoot the cupola for instant kill.
( No matter how you angle you just cant hide it )
Detpack ? Technically anywhere near it will kill it unlike KV.
Play a few games and dont hesitate to ask for tips, im always glad to help new players.
Besides shooting at the edge of the cannon shield, your Pz.4H can easily destroy KV. I don’t know what you’re trying to argue about.
Sure and plane and what else.
Question wasnt can you kill it or not but which is easier and KT2 is by far easier.
Especiatly for infantry.
Gif speaks more than the classical “skill issue”.
And this right here is why I dislike him because he never seems to look at the bigger picture
I can also tell you that as long as the shooting angle is appropriate, your Pz.3J can completely penetrate the front of KV.
Pay attention to ANGLE
You can kill the KT2 from any angle.
You can also penetrate a larger area. If we continue to look at BR3 vs BR3, it is obviously too simple for Pz.4H.
You no longer need to use Pz.4 F2 to deal with KV, Pz.4 H is much better.
Well I deliberately looked at the smaller picture here - Merc specifically says that AVT is better than FG42, and while I did agree with this statement before … now it isn’t crippled by body armor anymore.
AVT and AVS are more accurate so my entire point was that a very good player can make the extra accuracy have a bigger impact than 5 extra rounds.
What I am saying is that FG42 is much easier to use for all players.
Merc doesn’t count, he’s too good at the game.
And ? KV also roflstomps at BR2 where the pz3J1 requires ANGLE as you said to take out KV.
While majority if not all BR4 tanks are more than capable to take out KT from any angle.
You have to love these types of players. They can think of almost every excuse when they need it, and yet, for some magical reason, some of Germany’s stuff is, as always, one bar above where it doesn’t belong.
And as always no long term vision for the future or the competitive aspect so the allies and Soviets will never have any proper competition and there won’t be much reason to play the game once you’ve completed everything or have the best of everything 'cause there’ll be no one to fight in the end.
Please continue. Because of you greedy guys, I will never play Axis again.Fighting alongside a group of players like you is really nauseating.
Oh my, such a loss that im beyond words. Please dont.
I don’t care what you think. I want a true 50/50 balance, so that every side can bleed equally.
What will you continue to ask for after you have got better tanks and rifles? Let’s stay tuned.
Well I know this is unpopular, but I say that Soviet Assault rifle is only a tiny bit better than STG and ultimately doesn’t justify such an uproar you are giving.
The MG is a different question, its very unique as it has assault rifle stats and MG bullet capacity, its crazy strong yes - but MGs are still limited, you cant have 9 man squads with MGs.
RD44 is without a question the best MG in the entire game - but I would argue that’s because it isnt really a MG to begin with.
MG42 is better while specifically used on a bipod, since RD44 has slower bullet velocity and starts dealing less damage at mid to long range.
That being said, both kill with two shots because MGs are not allowed to deal rifle damage - which means its lower damage most often doesn’t matter.
I dont know how to fix this issue, I guess the best thing would be if all full power rifle MGs get rifle like one hit kill damage - then RD44 having no dispersion penalties would seem justified, but changing the entire class of guns just because of one weapon… I don’t know what to do here.