All these marshalls play the system. In the last 5 games, one team had 3-6 marshalls and the other most of the time hadn’t any.
We need to create a system that impedes one team of having a lot of high ranking and other has none. Even if you decide to play as axis or allies for example, you should be denied if the match is unbalanced and switch to the other team.
Full marshall squads of more than 3 must be forbiden.
Right now, the marshalls get together and just destroy the game. Completely ruining the experience as the other side just gets crushed.
it’s sad to say, but this game is almost done. check out my tag, I play this game since CBT but really disappoint right now. No team balance and seems like there more hackers than before. No new maps and weapon but more Golden team that destroy the balance. this game almost turns into a mess. what will we get next? a new campaign that only have few maps and few persons play? or another boring new level that need you keep play in the map that have long ago to get some exp, over and over again. wake up, there a lot choice of WW2 game. we dont need to waste time here if DEV dont even give fXXk of our advice.
Probably. Most attaining those ranks that fast either just play too much, and/or hang in campaigns and factions that generally dominate such as axis Normandy or Soviet Moscow/Berlin.
I played all day barlin, and i dont find a single marshal all try harder are still liutenant (silver) and dont forget that marshall rank need 300 point at least 100 battle counting win and lose, so is impossibile see them for at least a week
You underestimate the power of (old) kids living in basements, devoid of social life!
I remember some fool bragged once that he had nothing else good to buy with bronze or silver. He posted a picture of his “bank”, where he had thousands of silver cards, and 10k bronze.
My first reaction towards that bragging kid was “My. That guy probably doesn’t even remember what colour is the sky outside. No life nerd, eheh”
Yeah. Some ppl have no life and play too much, to a point it’s unhealthy.
I never understood what’s so funny about that franchise or that type of game… enter a room, enemies appear, beat em up before proceeding but it takes time cause they’re all damage sponges. Enter next place, enemies appear, beat em up before proceeding but it’s long cause they’re fucking sponges. Repeat. All. Damn. Game.
There are no marshals right now with the new season started but its obvious who were marshals with the ones having a high rank this early. Well Normandy Axis and Pacific Axis grinding for rank time.
Usually if you go up against a group of 3-4 marshals, its because they are in a group. Which let’s face it, are probably why they are marshals to begin with. You tend to score a lot higher and win more often when you are actually working with a group and communicating. That said, you don’t really have to be super good to be a marshal. Don’t let the intimidation of the rank get to you. Also, I recommend trying to find a group to play with. This game is not designed around “solo player experience”, they leave that up to games like COD. It’s balanced around having at least some degree of teamwork. Get together with a team and perhaps change up your playstyle a little bit, you’ll likely find that most of those marshal teams can’t hold up against an organized group.
Well, it’s their choice if they can afford it and don’t live at the expense of other people.
Life has no more meaning than a game or anything else.
I would even say that games are also a part(like everyone stuff\things in the world) of life, so it’s illogical to call such people those who have no life.
NA berlin was the same, i usaully play axis here because it have more player on berlin, it was a slaugther for soviet never seyed so many try harder play for the axis outside normandy
You all focus about the rank in this topic, blaming him because “There can’t be Marshalls in such short time”, that’s not the point.
The point is that there is a real difference in victories and difficulties depending on the campaign and side you play.
I’m doing an experience where I do 50 battles on every side, in every Campaign.
So far I pushed Normandy and Tunisia for 40 battles each : 75% Axis on Normandy VS 25% Allie, 90% Axis on Tunisia, yes yes 90% VS 35% for allies… I’m the same player, i’m not better on one side than the other… I’m the same person, same level, still there’s a huge difference. And YES to clim the rank you need to win/be the hero so the fact that there is more Marshall on such campaigns is totally logical… Even me to climb on the last weeks, let’s go full Tunisia Axis and WIN WIN WIN… So people who spam those campaigns are marshall faster and they can stay that way for a long time !
