I think a few campaings have to be balanced.
Berlin- Hard for Soviets to win, in city battles there are German snipers everywhere.
Tunisia- Allies almost always win.
Moscow- Soviets ususally win.
I think that Normandy is also a bit unbalanced. Stalingrad is balanced pretty well, but with mostly Soviets winning, and I think that Pacific War is the most balanced.
I’m not a seasoned player so my opinions could be not right. Feel free to share your thoughts
That’s not true. But I agree with Berlin and Tunisia.
It is… depending on server and time zone…
But it’s irrelevant anyway, because as mostly everyone knows, there will be a big conversion soonish with all campaigns being fused togheter…
But I get for a brand new player that it might look like “meh”
There’s also the fact most Soviet mains migrated away from Berlin because it’s harder than it used to be here, so they’re mostly at Moscow. I understand why, I’ve tried Berlin yesterday to play with those converted ppsh41 and… ooof… that’s end tier quality weaponry for real:
Probably became my instant favourite smg in game. Only thing marginally better are some assault rifles.
Huh? That is the most true of his whole post. The only time Axis win in Moscow is at certain times when the Soviet side is full of bots. Axis has nothing to even play for in Moscow. As Axis, you are basically leveling to get the same crap you already have with little to no variation on capabilities while the Soviets get huge leaps in tech as they level up their tiers. Your crowning achievement for Axis is a crappy Panzer IV F-2. Before that, the equipment is only different in name and maybe a boost in miniscule speed (if you are lucky). The second tiers Stuka is a little faster than the first, but both get run down by biplanes and your tail gunner doesn’t shoot back. The second tiers has a 500kg bomb, but there isn’t really a significant difference between it and the 240kg with four 50kg’s except that it can kill the top tier Soviet tank.
The two BF 110’s are virtually identical. Panzer IV E and Panzer IV F1 are virtually identical and then you keep getting Assaulter Squads that have worse equipment than the last.
To play as Axis on Moscow is litterally spinning your wheels.
oh, you’re complaining.
I did the Tunisian campaign 100% Axis often playing alone vs 10 players and massacring opponents despite losing games was relaxing.
Just don’t give up and don’t get discouraged.
Translate your post. This is the English-language forum area.
Fixed. Pz4 F2 now eats t34 for breakfast thanks to last update. Pz3J1 probably as well.
… Provided you tank smartly and see your opponent first… Which makes tanking fun, fair and exciting.
Not really, I do win in Moscow all the time. Get better.
Mmm no you don’t…
Same thing in this game as in any gaijin game… frist matches are easy because you play against people with similar rank as you but the more you game the less wins you get. The more it frustrates you to buy items and other things to make your life easier. After playing for 10 hours… I get to play almost only against generals with way better gear than me… and there are times in which I am first or second at my team at most and only against generals, marshals etc and my team are fresh players thrown into meat grinder. It sucks when you are thrown into fray like those soldiers in battle of stalingrad. When you are given rifle and your mate a mag for it and run against bullets.
Moscow - at the beginning Soviets have better sub-machine guns (PPD), planes with rockets (IL-2) and better sniper rifles (sniper SVT-40 + sniper AVS vs sniper Kar98k). But - at the end is fairly balanced campaign. Germans get MkB, better anti-tank weapons (GrB > PTRS) and… Panzer IV F2 has no problems with destroying T-50 and T-34.
Recently I play on Axis side and win 95 % of the time.
Because there they also need to aim for pixels and some German autos have dispersion lower than 0.5.
Unplayable.
Would require people to actually reach that end.
And Soviets the better Federov.
Its also like the sole tank there being able to… and its on level 38 or 39…
Funny, there is no balance in any campaign, and Berlin is mostly Soviet playerbase fault, the Devs gave them the best of the best even post war gun, still their brain damaged playerbase just can’t use any of those gears to win
Yes, the developers didn’t give them the best tank, the best machine gun, the best sniper machine gun, they didn’t distribute an elite airborne machine gun to each “boy” militia, they didn’t put 250 kg bombs on each attack aircraft to make it easy to destroy tanks. Moreover, the developers did not make the capture rate and the cost of respawn points inadequate for the allies… This is definitely the fault of the players who simply abandoned the campaign due to the actions of the developers.
German autos have dispersion lower than 0.5
Why yes, I do still use MP-38 despite unlocking most other smgs
Adam, you liar! Hand back all the extra XP you dishonesty gained by pretending you won!
Worst experience is Tunesia playing Axis vs Allies - Allies tanks are just superior + weapons got way better aiming - Also feels like the German AI has been dumped down
Stalingrad Campaign Soviet tanks is way superior to German tanks - takes like 10 shots if lucky to destroy a T34 - Takes the T34 1 shot to destroy a German tank - Fully balanced my a r s
Not German related. I’ve witnessed extremely dumb AI behaviour on both sides.
Well. For some reason, people dont care about the MP38 despite being possible the best SMG of thr Reich and prefer the MP40 so I stopped caring to name it.