What is your opinion on the topic?
Comparing the TZ-45 with the Thompson 7.63, the “Tommy Gun” is superior in terms of rate of fire, reload time, and recoil. Only the magazine size speaks in favor of the TZ-45.
And TBH even the Uragan SMG and the PPS-43 are better in terms of rate of fire and recoil.
I know that many people (including me) want a german SMG which are equal with the Thompson / Uragan / PPS-43 on BR II → for example buff the FNAB rate of fire (was requested multiple times).
Additional buffing that TZ-45 just by decreasing the BR wouldn’t be such a mess.
The TZ-45 is basically no different to the M1A1, which is now BR II (except of course 40 rounds vs 30, but damages less and is premium so that’s fine).
What would be most beneficial is if the FNAB was upgraded to 600 rpm (or thereabouts), as it’s more accessible to everyone. As much as I love the MP40, i know I would use the FNAB in a heartbeat if it were upgraded.
It’s a bit too late with M1A1 + Uragan + PPS42/43, 2A + 50 rounds!!! Type 1 smg at BR2. Germany got power creeped long time ago by all nations. Better make them on par with other nations rather than be left behind.
Community told them during the tests multiple times that URAGAN SMG is to strong for BR II. Same goes for the Thompson 7.63 which started the powercreep.
And what did Darkflow? Ignoring us.
So Allies and UDSSR have in that case the powercreep weapons xD
true in that case.
Either Darkflow buff FNAB and give it the real rate of fire or give us TZ-45. TBH I prefer the first one but I can live also with the second one
Dunno, also see plenty of Panzer IIs and T-26s in Berlin with occasional T-50s. It feels like it is only the Japanese players who do not spam low-tier tanks in BR5 matches.
