well i believe they can still work with loadaouts… the best would be if player could choose what he wants to go with… if AP are as good as you say at SV then their amount could stay and some HE added idk
It should use HEAT (“Effetto Pronto” in Italian) anyway 
its original ammunition
2 Likes
Tank still has maximum capacity of shells, that is 43+1 in gun already for Semovente. After there will be loadout option that everyone can change what they want, be my guest, give it HE, but right now, i want every avaible shell to be APHE so i can deal with enemy tanks, that are my priority, and should be priority of every tanker.
Yeah, it could. I woudnt be against HEAT shells. But it is not a priority now, as it performs good already.
2 Likes
“even though in the North African theatre some crews used to store some 100 shells by removing their seats and filling the space with the extra rounds”
I found in wikipedia soo it could be little bit off but 100 rounds maaan its crazy number, it will turn that SPG to atom bomb if somebody shoot it
Never heard of it and i read some books about Italian armored divisions in Africa, but everything is possible.
I am fully aware that the HE round won’t pen a tank. I’m not asking for it to pen tanks. I don’t know if you have noticed, but you shoot more rounds at infantry than tanks. And if not… you are doing something wrong.
Soo by killing enemy tanks soo they cant hold our push, or help enemy push is something wrong? Okay champ 
Sigh. Uh no. I never said that. There is a maximum of two tanks per team. There is a minimum of 6 infantry squads per team. If you spend MORE time shooting at tanks than at infantry you are spending over 50 percent of your time fighting only 20% of your opponents. This is a fairly straightforward concept. I also haven’t come close to running out of ammunition on my semovente once. Not even close. You are creating problems where none exist in order to justify a narrow minded and short sighted viewpoint. Chill, smoke some ganja or something. Try thinking beyond the narrow criteria you have laid down, pigeonholing the Semovente into a narrow purpose.
1 Like
Problem is, when you kill enemy tank in Tunisia, there is another one there in half a minute, soo i spend lot of my time killing tanks, rather than Infantry. I talk from experience of using Semovente in every single battle i play. Im full level as Axis in Tunisia. I can say same that you are creating problem where there is none. That vehicle is competetive, can kill Infantry and tanks same. Your problem is narrow minded because you see problem somewhere where there is none. If you never run out of ammo, then you either die before you do, or dont use it as much as you could. I run out of ammo in like half a battles i had in it and that is a lot of battles from level 18 to 26, and i still play even when i have full level.
1 Like
Literally sitting on bombs! Those guys were motivated 
2 Likes
Motivated to fire it as fast as they could, before enemy saw them 
1 Like
5 Likes
facepalm If you are living that long you are the exception. The absolute 1% or lower exception. Which is a terrible way to balance a game. I also question the veracity of your statements. There is really nothing further to discuss.
i lold x)
1 Like
LOL he doesn’t run out of ammo in battle.
Next time i will run out of ammo, i will take a photo just for you.
yeah im waiting
You will have to wait till friday, i dont have time to play right now.
I actually ran out of ammo on my Semovente today. Shot 75% of the rounds at infantry.
On a related note…the Grant is an order of magnitude better. I’m not sure what the solution is, but the Grant is just clearly better in every way. Better armor. Better firepower. Better against tanks. better against infantry. Better survivability. Just better in every way. This is not fair, nor is it just. There are several ways to fix this, but something needs to be done.
1 Like
I’ve found in CBT my Semovente would fare well against Grants even directly.
But they do run out of ammo quickly.