T-28 is the L-10 though does it not?
The 28E has similar penetration on its APHE though if I remember right
Yeah sorry, itâs L-10.
Or very close. Lemme check.
Nah, L-10 has 67 mm pen, and L-11 has 78 mm pen. Still it has 7.2s reload.
1 Like
4chan user, to answer that, I am a foreigner, so my English is not good, so there may be errors in using the translator.
The meaning of what I wrote, which you are curious about, was a sarcasm saying that no matter how strong a tank, as long as the speed is long, all the balance will be resolved.
2 Likes
So am I.
Donât understand this part. You mean, as long as itâs fast?
T-34 is slower than T-50. Go play staingrad, T-34-41 is almost the same as T-34-40, and itâs not a very hard target for infantry or plane.
1 Like
Iâm saying it was garbage irl, due to production errors and quality issues, plus logistical problems, but if itâs in full working condition, or in game, then yeah itâs good
It sounds fast. And, of course, the t-50 is a light tank and the t-34 is a medium tank, so the t-50 is faster⊠Youâre comparing the two tanks wrong. And the t-34 tank has a running speed of 25 km/h in the open field, which is a fast axis.
1 Like
T-26 is also a light tank.
T-50 has almost 22hp per ton, T-34 has about 19, so mobility is worse. Reverse speed is also worse, thatâs important.
1 Like
keep trying to compare it with the t-50, but it is true that the t-34 has improved armor than the t-50, so it is slow and has poor driving performance at night. But it has higher armor and firepower than the t-50. And it was much better in speed and out-of-the-way than the Panzer IV or Tank III of that era.
1 Like
It has literally the same armor, except front. And insides are much worse. Fuel tanks everywhere, etc. Turret is bigger and easier to pen.
You canât make 80 y/o tank faster, sorry. Germans made it that way. And I never said german tanks ainât easy to kill. I just say that defeating T-34 wonât be as hard as you expect.
1 Like
Then, if it has stronger armor than the t-50 and the speed is similar, isnât it op? And with your strange logic, even when a tiger appears in Mogqva, would you say âHmm~~! Although the tiger is a bit good, itâs not that hard to catchâ? Give me some thought. With your logic, all tanks are easy to catch.
2 Likes
What kind of retarded logic is that
âșUhh he said it not that fast, we need Tiger and heâll be okay because tiger SLOW
Could you please explain which part you want to address?
2 Likes
Iâm just wrapping my head around how the T-34 with the L-11 is turbo OP when its just a T-50 with shittier armor, mobility, and a 8 second reload.
Yeah its going to be good, but anything that can pen ~42 or so millimeters of armor is going to slap the fuck out of it. Nevermind that the GrB will OHK it easily.
Idk where the hell you got the Tiger from because it isnât a good comparison at all considering it has much heavier armor and has fantastic mobility to boot.
1 Like
And explosive packs, even if not killing, will constantly set it on fire. And, due to their position inside, that will cause fast death for the whole crew.
2 Likes
A tank with an engine fire is as good as dead like 80% of the time since you have to get out to put it out as well.
1 Like
So, as a general conclusion, the t-34 is not an op that has multiple ways to destroy it, right?
Its going to be good if not great, but I wouldnât call it OP
Unless weâre fighting end to end on Quarry then its a rat shit like all tanks lol
Yes
- Yes
- Yes. Idk maybe they forgot to introduce it because I dont get it otherwise how they can forget one side.
? Sole reason, why I didnt like it. Doesnt make any sense.
The most important part of a tankâs armor is the front armor. Talking about the same thickness of armor except for the front armor is useless.
2 Likes
Yes, even if the t-55 appears in Enlisted, it seems like you guys are saying something like, âItâs not an op because there are so many ways to defeat it.â Ha!
Iâm going to fall out of this stupid discussion, you guys win lol