- Equipment imbalance
You can tell just by looking at the tanks revealed in this dev right now. What kind of head are you trying to match the t-34 (1940) with the No. 3 J1 type? I still use the old War Thunder DM for this game, and the sergeant armor is ridiculously strong. In that case, either introduce the current War Thunder DM or nerf the sergeant armor.
- One-sided or high-performing premium squad
damn why? I don’t know if the rocket tanks were only given to Moscow and the Soviet Union. Why didn’t Germany give them? And why is the premium squad only complaining about the Soviet Army? In Moscow, the Germans only have semi-automatic rifles, but the Soviets have more than two types. Did you plan to ruin the infantry balance? What the hell are you doing?
Give at least one of the pieces of equipment in the photo above to the German Army in Moscow.
And roll back the rate of fire of semi-auto rifles so that they can fire as quickly as before.
I was shocked to see this dev… Did your great-grandfather die by the Germans? If you don’t support Putin, please stop showing favoritism towards Soviet soldiers. Please!
16 Likes
The only advantage of this change is that it can increase the sales of the gold coin team pz4e.
3 Likes
Enlisted is sitting right under Gaijin’s control, you really expected favouritism towards Axis?
I could say it’s for the sake of realism and historical accuracy, but guess what, Pz IIIs killed A LOT of T-34s, and people keep forgetting that T-34s were absolutely shit, their armour constantly shattered due to overheating during production, constantly broke down, lack of spare parts, horrible optics and so on, so yeah.
It is historically accurate to add them, but only if they constantly break down during matches, would be funny actually.
4 Likes
The T-34 isn’t garbage at all when it comes to armor and gun caliber. It’s a tank of the same class as the 4th. It’s actually a tank that destroyed many German tanks. But garbage? With the No. 3, it is very difficult to counter the t-34, but the t-34 is easy against the No. 3. I think Moscow’s balance is completely broken with this dev
4 Likes
Giving a premium squad to only one side is unfair. I am not asking for unhistorical squads for Moscow axis, but a half track with a AT gun(Idk ww2 weaponry stuff, don’t ask me which AT gun) would have been just fine.
As far I know, Germans had no automatic rifles like AVS 36 in Moscow, so all the developers had to do for the balance was to keep the semi-auto as they were.
You mean that Enlisted uses WT’s old DM model? That sentence is a bit confusing.
1 Like
Moscow is unbalanced ? No shit Sherlock Holmes!
It was before this update and many updates ago, the only people that play Moscow allies are the ones that unironically think Stalingrad and Berlin are too hard for them so they need to play against a even more weaker Axis so that they don’t feel butt hurt when they want to RP as a communist
1 Like
It means using the old DM model.
1 Like
Practically, T-34 will be more dangerous for infantry than T-50, but it has much longer reload and worse turret armor than T-50, so it will be easier target for tanks.
Don’t forget about infantry and planes, since that’s not WoT or WT. T-34 is easy to set on fire with GrB or explosive pack, and it’s a better target for stukas than T-50, since it has worse mobility.
It won’t break the non-existing balance as much as you expect. Still will be a huge pain in the ass.
1 Like
Well, the T-34 had to deal with a lot of serious issues back in 1940. No radios, spare parts. Even the armor was problematic, regarding the armor plates, which were hardened way too much during production. This caused massive spalling in the tank when the armor was hit, even on non-penetrating shots.
Bad optics and really bad visibility especially for the tank commander. One of the biggest flaws was the two-men-turret. A tank commander, which also acts as loader, caused high reload times and low situation awareness.
Other problems were already mentioned. T-34 was relatively short in active service.
T-34 with spare transmission
3 Likes
Have you played the Moscow campaign? Do you have any brain disorders? Please shut up if you have less than 10 hours of playtime in Moscow Germany. In the first place, the t-50 is too fast and the armor is hard, so it is difficult to defeat it with a grb.
1 Like
What is that even supposed to mean? lol
But in general, yes. T-34 will drown the tank balance in Moscow even deeper.
1 Like
36 lvl as soviets, grinding at 20th lvl as germans. That’s the last campaign where I don’t have max level as axis.
What can I say here? Git gud.
Also just tested it in stalingrad. Yes, GrB can pen T-34 from the front, from the back and from the side. Side penetration also sets it on fire.
T-34 is bigger than T-50 and slower than T-50.
2 Likes
That’s real. Does the game have that problem? Yes? I’m talking about game equipment, not real equipment. Is it true that the t-34 has strong damage and firepower and defense against #3 and 4?
Yes it is. 76 mm L-11 gun. T-28E also has it.
Still it has 1.5x times longer reload than T-28E.
no are you stupid? Of course, I don’t feel any problems when playing the Soviet side. Please play Moscow Germany for at least 4 hours and come and join the discussion.
So do you think the su-152 is worse than the tank 2? That logic? Please think for a moment and live.
It’s based, Glorious USSR cannot lose. If the winrate of glorious USSR is lower than 80% then something is wrong. Remember it’s a historical accurate game.
2 Likes
tank 2
What do you mean by that, redditor?
1 Like