Btw there is one more rare soviet gun - TM-44, smg produced by partisans.
Tbh that was probably me. It was like on a shooting range. Soviets were runing towards my position like a rats. I knew i had to defend the church at all costs, thats all. Sorry m8
is it a modified mp40?
You mean TM-44? I think its not not but there was a lot of loot machinepistole and they use it like reference in some parts
yes it look like an mp40 that had it’s barrel and stock replaced for a different round i assume
Yeah looks like they use some parts
The Tm-44 looks like a ppsh meets a mp40. It has the folding stock, pistol grip, and the upper reciever has the shape of an mp40, but has the barrel shroud and curved magazine of the ppsh.
The problem sovled! We just need a Tm-44 in both teams
Really? I thought it was used only by Finnish
Probably Kamenka
Finnish use Suomi as far as i know 
Guys, dont try to argue with “TCatPlaysGamezYT”, he only speaks for German.
He doesn’t even know Mosin 91/30 can and commonly reload with the striper clip.
He argued with me about this, that mosin 91/30 should not use clip in game, just before devs add the clip reload back.
1 Like
He also told that T-60 can penetrate Pz.II in frontal armour =) and still aint show us some prof but this time (recoil of smg) i should agree with him
1 Like
If we, my Enlisted chat group who know his bias well, more than 80ppl there, can speak English without so much headache, we gonna blow him out.
We all know soviet are somewhat weaker, but we can not say it out here due to our limited English abilities. (Chinese players here, we do not speak russian, so only able to communicate in English forum)
1 Like
I also saw that a lot of german mains (I’m not calling them wehraboos out of respect towards other players) are negating that Soviet team get weaker weapons. They know if devs buff allies they will not be able to enjoy winning 99% of the time with their recoilless SMG’s. T-60 is an anti infantry vehicle while bt-7 was not meant to fight in close range combat. Also Soviet Anti tank rifle PTRD was better than the german one irl but in Enlisted it is bugged and can’t deal any damage at all even when shooting at weak armor. Why was this problem never fixed is because one team always negates the issues of the other team and that’s a big problem in fps games, especially in ww2 community
I main soviets and can agree that soviets are stronger right now than germans. Unlike in alpha
First, sorry to derail the topic a little bit here to get some baseless accusations and arguments out of the way.
Well sorry princess that I asked for historical sources that it could as I am not an expert on every obscure bolt action rifle from before the 1900s. I argued that it was possibly a change made for historical accuracy. After you showed a source disclaming my suspicion, I did in fact agree that the rifle should get its historical use of stripper clips.
Well sorry to burst your bubble, but I literally said in this thread:
My arguments are from my point of view as a German main. Sure, my experiences are almost solely from playing Germany. However, I do not need buffs for Germany to succeed in this game, nor do I seek for “easy kills” with some OP weapon. My standpoints have allways been from an in-match 1vs1 engagement perspective, which you try to counter with winrates. My points to you were never about winrates. When players on either team have an equal chance of winning an individual battle, I consider the game balanced. Winrates depend too much on teamwork and with Enlisted playerbase size (because of AI), it is in my view not an accurate metric on whether one side is actually stronger than the other. I do not understand why you just want to go on a crusade against me because I do not agree with your arguments. That is very immature.
I haven’t gotten around getting the stuff for that initially and I forgot about that afterwards, so sorry about that. If you want, you can check my streams, where you can find a bunch of moments where I die to a T-60 from the front I might be able to get some tests in with a T-60 of my own this weekend so more on that later.
With that out of the way, let’s try to get a bit more on topic.
They did just that last patch (bolt actions 14>15 and SMGs 5.5>5.7 which allows our bolt actions to oneshot again more consistently) and with the current state of the game I can agree that Russia has it worse mainly because of playerbase but also because of the PPD recoil and issues with the PTRD.
Got my hands on it the other day and yeah it is as bad compared to the PzB as the PzB was compared to the PTRS.
ehhhh they’re pretty close but soviets lose more because of playerbase size. At least, that’s when I play (which is during midnight for Russian players)
I asume you got that picture from this article, which is the only source on that weapon I can find: https://soldat.pro/en/2018/09/10/partizanskii-pistolet-pylemet-tm-44/
As far as I understand it was a Russian attempt of using the mechanics of a MP40 but chambered in the russian SMG cartridge. However, as the designation of “44” most likely means “year of production 1944”, it would never been used in the battle of Moscow. Perhaps it would be fitting for the battle of Berlin, though.
regarding the Finnish, they used a copy of the PPS-43 SMG (which does not look like that TM-44) also known as the KP m/44, as well as the Suomi.
For reference, this is how the m/44 looks like:
1 Like
I should’ve specified, soviets are stronger, but the playerbase is smaller or worse leading to unbalance
2 Likes
With the recent changes they only have like +1 damage on the rifles which is no longer enough to diffirentiate between torso one-shots or two-shots. The SMGs are too far apart to compare, but I think MPs can do with a bit more recoil and PPD with less. You guys do get versatility with the shotgun and PPD/PPK choices, but we get 2 diffrent LMGs. Haven’t been able to test those too much so I can’t say much about the LMGs
I assume you are playing on US servers (i looked at your YT channel and heard non-broken English).