Oops,. They have no problem because the headquarter is in Hundary
Bring it on
Butbutbutbut…
I still want x2 for Pacific pack.
yeah that helped World of Warships immensely… remember it having around 20-30k concurrent users at peak hours without steam and steam launch gave it around 1-2k players extra players at launch (2017). not to mention loads of negative reviews cause people couldnt transfer their account from wargaming to steam.
steam is not instant fix and it probably wouldnt see some big improvement for year or two.
DF needs to do something. There is enough people in the forums and in discord that are making this a known issue for longevity of the game. They need to do something. They have told us they “listen to the community” well they need to listen here and the ideas floating around
Dividing by area and time is bettet idea
My idea for a long time has been to unify campaigns into years (early-mid-late war or even just early-late if we’re desperate) then have every nation matchmake against eachother either in historical, alt history, or “training” battles.
No more Germany getting stretched thin, everyone fights everyone.
and actually you solved absolutely nothing… you have 4 campaigns in those, with pacific and invasion of france you would have at least 6, but by your system you would split pacific into 2 campaigns, so effectively you would get at least 7 campaigns.
primary reason why people want different progression system is to unify playerbase and not to play against bots. also for less grinding.
There is no way you can gather everything under a big faction bubble. Different equipment, uniforms,batallions, vehicles, weapons etc
… were used in different fronts and stages of war. Ww2 was the biggest war in history streched in 5 damn continents. Lets go with your idea : so we will gonna see usa marines with summer uniforms for equatorial pacific islands but fighting in battle of bulge ?
Also with current grind there is no way darkflow will do this. Everybody complains about grind but in war thunder, grind is exceptionally harder than enlisted. Darkflow already said that grind is essential and will never be changed. Unless you want to expreince wt’ish grind
How the progress system will be like then ?
Lets say i want to focus on pacific and unlock hellcat
But hellcat is under the p 38 in techtree. Why should i wait to unlock hellcat after a plane i dont care and absent in pacific ?
never once have i mention anything about squads in this topic. but since you asked in one other topic i suggested cause we have generic soldier squads (rifleman 1,2,3, assaulter 1,2,3 etc.) you can equip weapons on those squads and when they load into specific campaign they are put in their campaign equivalent of those squads with their uniforms.
when you have low number of campaigns it seems so, but what when the number of campaigns go over 20? or 30? you can add couple of major campaigns and dozens of minor campaigns.
well i dont want to grind till fg42, but i have to. also you dont have to copy WT progress list, it is perfectly fine to make enlisted one.
enlisted shit doesnt smell cause WT shit is smellier…
I didnt say lets add 30 or so campaigns. I say turn campaigns to theatres. With this you can fight from rostov to leningrad with just one faction in 1941 - 43 and single tech tree at east theatre maps or from iashi-kishinev to poznan in 43-45 at east theatre maps. Authenticity and uniqeness can be sustained easily with this system
Have you ever read my post ?
Interchanging Equivalent squads for each campaign, lol you kidding ? What is the equal of marines from pacific to ground troops in hürtgen forest excatly ?
Answer: error 404 not found.
Or what will happen when you equiped class 1 rifleman soldier with grenade launcher ? ( which you can do in current system)
you talk about reading when you clearly didnt read my post. rifleman 2 exists in every campaign. just put skin from tunis rifleman 2 when you play tunis maps, or normandy skin for rifleman 2 when you play normandy maps. but in game menu you have generic rifleman 2 (maybe with option to see how they look in every campaign). simple?
no. you are just renaming campaigns as theaters and saying they represent more battles. this is current system. you didnt invent anything new.
and what should happen? equipment grind is separate from any squad grind (which is totally pointless even now). and if you want to know more, read the topic and then ask questions. i was suggesting unifying equipment grind cause it is stupid to grind 5 times for same weapon. and that number keeps growing with every added campaign. and introducing MM so you can have balanced games. but you didnt read any of that.