In the next version, the Soviet AVT-40 should be strengthened, because after the United States obtains the T20, the AVT-40 will become the weakest level five rifle in the overall performance of the game, with the least amount of bullets, the slowest firing rate, the maximum recoil, and the same damage as the T20. Moreover, the team where the AVT-40 is located will be more difficult to upgrade than the team where other level five rifles are located. So, please strengthen AVT-40 in the next version.
2 Likes
Imo Is fine as It Is if German FG2 don’t start in full auto to, if then, yes it need be buffed in ammunition
1 Like
AVT has lower recoil than FG and has better dispersion and dmg.
And that’s what matters since the US does not fight the USSR.
7 Likes
Not yet anyway hehe.
But in the future, the Soviet Union may engage in war with Japan, such as the August Storm. So we need to consider it for the future.
Yeah DF will eventually include all those famous Soviet-Allied battles such as… but also… ehm and dont forget…
1 Like
Korea? Definitely ww2.
3 Likes
Did the Soviets even fought there? I think they only supplied Northies and Chinese meat grinders with gear and maybe did some air battles.
I bet there was at least one russian fighting. So we may as well portray him as a whole brigade.
1 Like
No, actually we would prefer the “August Storm” campaign, so that the combat environment of the four camps is complete.
look
Wrong enemy.
However, in terms of FG42II and AVT-40, their overall performance, including upgrade difficulty, is slightly inferior to FG42II. Therefore, in this regard, AVT-40 should also be slightly enhanced.
It doesn’t start in full auto in comparison with the fg42II, imo we can ask a buff if both gun started in full auto
FG42II
- 5 more bullets.
- Higher rof
AVT
- More dmg to the point it is better at killing enemies instead of downing them
- Starts in full auto
- Has bayonet (which also reduces recoil a bit)
- Better recoil
- Better accuracy
Hmm…
3 Likes
The question still remains: why do we need to compare Soviet stuff to Western stuff if they do not fight each other and never will?
But even if so:
- Soviets have ARs, Allies not.
- Soviets have better AT launchers.
- Soviets have “better” tanks.
- Soviets have better SMGs.
- Soviets have better tank cannon.
- Soviets have SF sniper rifle, Allies not.
- Soviets have flexible paratroopers.
Draw:
- The Soviets have Ampo, US, a low br flamethrower tank.
Compared to:
- Allies have P-47.
- Allies have P-38 and 250kg P-51.
- Allies have better MGs.
- Allies maybe have better Sf.
Errrr…
6 Likes
No, no, no, the current tanks in the Soviet Union are not considered “better”. The Soviet Union now needs IS-3 or T-44-100. And Soviet planes are indeed a significant weakness.
22/8 recoil fully upgraded isn’t “maximum recoil”
It only having 15 rounds in the magazine doesn’t matter because the AVT kills in 1 shot, the FG-42 needs 2 shots to kill a soviet soldier with body armor, so the FG has 10 effective kills while the AVT can have 15 kills with 1 magazine
1 Like
85 is better than Sherman and IS2 is better than Pershing.
But is this all you got as counter?
Huh
ridiculous opinion, the hidden recoil multiplier gives it the best recoil out of any auto rifle
stop trying to make the soviets better than they already are
1 Like