It is.
Numerous indentical topics about this “issue” were created in past few days. And even the notification from helper that it’s already been passed to the devs for resolution didn’t deter you from spamming it.
Yeah, because you definitely haven’t liked the previous topics that shared exactly the same opinion. And there’s was need to spam it all over again.
(And if I would go check the Russian forum, I’d probably find a topic there too - created by the same people.)
At least be honest that you are trying to push changes into the game with systematic spam.
There was definitely no need to have 4+ identical topics about the same “issue” in time period of 1 week.
Silenced Kiraly 39M? Did it exist? If so, I wouldn’t mind seeing it as a weapon of some kind of Hungarian guerrilla unit.
But not in the tech tree. Weapons with silencers should not be in the tech tree. Since ancient times, weapons with silencers in Enlisted have been the preserve of premium and event squads, simply event/BP weapons, but they have never been in the tech tree. And that makes sense. Because neither side in World War II used silencers on a large scale. Weapons with silencers in WWII were the weapons of a few special units; no one issued them to ordinary soldiers.
So maybe it’s not worth introducing it? Well, if you’re going to introduce it, then the PPSh-41 (S) should be an event squad weapon and lowered to 4BR, just like the regular PPSh-41.
The point here is not who uses what, the point is that the PPSh-41 (S) is a very dubious, non-historical weapon. It has no place in the tech tree, at least without extreme necessity. Which there is none.
Again, it’s not about who uses what and that the PPSh-41 (S) is useless at 5BR. The point is:
- Historical accuracy
- Atmosphere
Sometimes historical accuracy can and even should be disregarded for the sake of balance, as in the case of the AS-44, but the PPSh-41 (S) is not one of those cases. It is simply not needed in the tech tree.
6 Likes
Well at least it was forwarded to the devs…at LEAST
4 Likes
It sounds great, but unfortunately
All is dust
enlisted will not be the same…
1 Like
In any case, even if it is spam, as I said, it would be spam for the greater good. Besides, technically speaking, it is not spam, as the content and text of all posts about the PPSh-41 (S) are different; they are written in different ways.
3 Likes
It’s just annoying. It would be much better to have the debate consolidated in one place.
“I can spam because I think I am doing the good thing”.
So many entitled people these days. Like there’s not even possibility for someone to bring better solution. Let’s your steamroll such person with consistent spam, coordinated by the same group of people.
It seems to me it’s that or they are genuinely so concerned about the uniqueness of a silenced weapon going away by being added to the tech tree.
I would prefer as such to happen… all nations minus japan get a suppressed high BR smg or even assault rifle in tech tree.
These guns are fun and are hard counters to the shitty AI we have now… they are jank and always will be but that’s what can be fun about the game.
No reason i should be locked to the 4 i already spent money on like wowww im so insulted that i get unlimited more? I really cannot believe this is always the excuse when premium gets added to tech tree basically
Since asymmetrical balance seems to be the trend recently, adding a similar weapon to each nation could be a better alternative… but considering this appears to be a purely based off a picture the excuse can be made to just scrap it or be a portal to a whole bunch of new possibilities.
Thanks, but no thanks. Weapons with silencers should remain premium/event/BP weapons, as they always have been. And the PPSh-41 (S) should be removed from the tech tree; instead, they should make an event squad of Soviet commandos with it.
2 Likes
Let’s add silencers to all weapons, then collimators, then optics. Thank you, but we don’t need that. If you want to play circus instead of WW2, go to Battlefield.
1 Like
And how do you imagine this place for debates? Spoiler alert: you know what the developers will do with this place. They will ignore it. The only way to get anything out of the Enlisted developers is to whine, whine, and whine some more! Whine, whine, and whine again!!! That’s the only way that works, at least to some extent.
Firstly, there is relative freedom of speech on the forum. If someone has an opinion on how to solve a problem, they can write a post about it. Secondly, as for the best solution, I have already suggested what I believe to be the best solution. Remove the PPSh-41 (S) and make it an event squad of Soviet commandos.
4 Likes
This is perfectly understandable but no reason why considering when in practice you can get 1 in like a year and also be limited to 1 squad (applicable to all sides)
I do not see the need to force these in fomo or events that are already tedious as is and let alone for money… furthermore the pass shop is gone.
Sure i can have them in one squad right the 4 i already got which mind you… each nations suppressed weaponry variably vastly.
Going from the bramit (ironic given this weapon) to the M3 suppressed is laughable and yes now we have the suppressed thompson but they should i be forced to a no engineer squad to use it? Oh because they should be limited and forced to a special squad?
This weapon would give the excuse to have one in each nation which despite the bo
p/event/premium exclusivity excuse constantly being used in this argument in reality seems to be anti consumer… new players what they got the bramit since the shop got removed? What’s to come? How often are they going to choose the cool weapons to put in events? Not many.
And now they are forced to buy into the predatory squad buying system which could or couldn’t be these commandos you have but also would be a tedious event.
—
Skipping all that jazz Instead you can apply them to all squads and have the fun all around which is the way they seemed to want to go with this weapon or tbh it’s just soviet bias.
Although simply making them an event squad would be a much more friendly solution… i cannot help but agree.
1 Like
I think that’s the issue. They’ve already listened once, and that’s final. They “laboured” away making a weapon no one wanted, and because they’re shit off, they’re still going to add it.
Also, on the topic of the Type Hei Late, I am all for it. Japan deserves a mag-fed semi auto that holds 10 rounds. America could have the mag fed Johnson too.
2 Likes
i love German Players Enlisted and WW2 is/was fought between Germany and USSR only, yes as long as Germany maintains parody with USSR nothing else matters
i would surport that cause (if they buff avt have 25 or 20 bullets)
THATS WHAT I’M SAYIN!
same thing with Uragan and Federov 1912. Nobody asked for those… also the 1912 is ass anyway, no idea why anyone would take it over a 91/30
3 Likes
My position on this is probably already well know, the PPSh-41 (S) as a tech-tree weapon is dumb, even as suppressed weapons go this was absolutely the worst alternative to pick, and that’s without the main issue that suppressed weapons just don’t belong in the tech tree.
If this thing still goes through (which unfortunately likely, despite major public opposition), you can be sure I’ll be writing a suggestion post about moving some of the current event suppressed weapons to the tech tree. If the non-existant PPSh-41 (S) somehow is “tech tree material”, then surely the Sten Mk II (S), the most successfull and widely used suppressed weapon of the war, deserves a spot too? Other countries don’t deserve being left out too either of course… I didn’t ask for this but I’ll follow the precedent if the devs sets it…
3 Likes
