The Moscow Wehrmacht is too wea

Suggestions
23

Yes

1 Like
24

Berlin ā€¦ Moscow i xp the soviets and yeah its pretty easy vezry unbalanced

25

On the other hand, you have German sweatlords in Moscow even worse when they stack together with the 4 stacks. For some reason plenty of noobs for both sides in Moscow more than other campaigns considering Berlin is very chaotic with the huge gap between low level and high level. You are lucky if the whole Soviet team in Moscow is a bunch of noobs.

Soviets have almost the same high level guns on all campaigns that they are in with the difference being mostly vehicles unlike low level weapons where Moscow and Stalingrad have early PPD while Berlin had the PPS. Moscowā€™s T-34 is much worse than the T-34-85 obviously

In Berlin, it was more like who has the better team with more players willing to sweat to victory.

or have a team of 4 sweatlords grouped together armed with discord communication.

1 Like
26

Honestly the most P2W campaign where you have cases of full P2W German players with Mkbs while Soviet team is full of F2Ps where they shouldā€™ve removed the paywall for the unlocks by now.

27

Any campaign wins with a stack on one team.

Though in Moscow stacks seem more common on the Soviet side.

2 Likes
28

Thatā€™s definitely cap

1 Like
29

Can we talk about the BF110 F1 2x 250kg you unlock at very early lvl then the BF110 F2 at lvl 37 if I remember wich is just a copy pasted shit of the F1 with exactly same armement and worse flying stats ? So thatā€™s the enlisted called ā€œhigh endā€ lvl? Let me laugh.
In the meantime the Russian get a unique bomber with 6x 100kg and 6 manā€™s crews at same lvl.

Iā€™m sorry but Iā€™m not sorry, you canā€™t make more biase than this from those shameless and lazy ass developers.

30

The Pe2-31 is a little JU88 op as f**k, i love it

31

Probably shouldnā€™t have added MKB42(H) and Federov in the first place.

5 Likes
32

The Normans can shoot down the tanks with rockets and the Germans in Moscow can only look at the t34 in despair because there is nothing to try to kill the t34 but the Stuka

1 Like
33

Playing the T34 i agree enemy tanks cant do anything , barely the same for PAK and GRB39

34

Yes I agree they shouldnā€™t have added them, they really donā€™t belong in that campaign and they really had to disturbe the one campaign that didnā€™t have high level players running aroumd with automatic rifles squads

1 Like
35

Field of vision for T-34 in Moscow is actually shit even compared to the T-34 STZ or 1941 in Stalingrad. Even more worse when compared to the T-34-85 where itā€™s actually hard to spot a sneaky AT gun or GRB. Still use the T-34 because of the firepower and mobility despite the drawbacks.

36

So the only counterpart is view ā€¦ but i prefer get well protected but see bad than the opposite

1 Like
37

Stalingrad is different, itā€™s unbalanced to favor tgose who paid

38

Yes, but the ju87 has a rear gunner which the IL2 hasnā€™t, so itā€™s easier to get shot down, the PEs fly like bricks and are outclassed by the bf110 which are faster and turn faster, and the SB bomber has some problems with keeping itā€™s wings attached from what i read.

1 Like
39

Only if the stuka isnā€™t paying attention.
If you lose a dogfight to an IL-2, you shouldnā€™t be flying.

40

I also would prefer to see the assault rifles removed in Moscow campaign, or at least moved to premium status.

1 Like
41

xD

42

Iā€™m curious about the March source? The earliest documented evidence Iā€™ve seen is May 1942 in Crimea.

image
image1484Ɨ966 66.7 KB