The Moscow Wehrmacht is at a disadvantage on all fronts Both Federov and t34 tanks are several times better than German weapons The Moscow Wehrmacht needs Panzer IV f2 and enhanced mkb42 assault rifle
5 Likes
The Federov is a versatile weapon, due to its 0.35 bullet spread, the Federov can cope with medium and long range combat, at the same time, the Federov damage within 10 meters is 12.6, soldiers without health skills can be killed by a single shot, too unbalanced
The Germans did not have a single tank that could fight the t34. Panzer IV f1 and Panzer IV e could not penetrate the t34’s slanted armor on the front and side. Panzer III j1 often managed to penetrate the t34 due to the low damage of the penetrant shell, but was killed by 76 gun seconds after only killing one crew member
2 Likes
Meanwhile, the Russians in Moscow had avs automatic rifles, while the Germans could only use zh29 semi-automatic rifles. There’s a big gap between the two
1 Like
Well already the ppd38 was an overkill
5 Likes
As and nagan
The Panzer IV F2 didn’t start to show up on the battlefields until late March 1942, the battle of Moscow ended January 7th that same year. Similar to the Sherman Jumbo in Normandy, it’s only a few months in gap but still technically shouldn’t be there.
I also personally dont want to see more automatic rifles showing up in Moscow. For me the novelty of Moscow was that it was the early war campaign it had smgs and rifles, early design vehicles… the additions of the MKB42 (which wouldn’t have seen action in Moscow either) and the Fedorov (which saw limited use during WW2) really took away from what I liked about the Moscow campaign, so I’d prefer they don’t dive further down that rabbit hole
12 Likes
After the introduction of the non-existent MKB42 in the Moscow battle, the addition of Panzer IV f2 is no longer important. The game is going to be thinking about entertainment, and it would be really bad to just add Federov without the MKB42
1 Like
In this game, the Battle of Moscow (1941) is more powerful than the firepower configuration in 1955
You missed my point about not going further down that rabbit hole. I personally don’t like that they added automatic weapons and don’t want them to continue down that path with more automatics and vehicles that don’t belong in that campaign
4 Likes
I probably never xp the axis on Moscow … cause do that is masoshism
Not sure about the T-34 in Moscow but they never give me trouble in Stalingrad, no F2 necessary.
Just the lack of real teammates is the biggest problem as Germany there.
Thoughts on Sturmpanzer II?
Big derp nuke-thrower balanced by an exposed crew and paper mache armor. Could attract players.
I’m always a fan of raising the skill floor as you progress in levels.
3 Likes
Moscow is the most unballanced campaign.
Both Gun, plane and tank favor the Ally.
The only good stuff Axis has is the MKb 42 (H) Sniper and the MG34.
On the other hand Ally got:
- The drum smg (PPD34/38, PPD40, PPSh41)
- The One Shot SMG (Federov Automat)
- The unkillable tank (T34, T50), only the T38 is killable by a Panzer IV. And the T28 got an advantage for it will one shot any Panzer if it successfuly pen it.
- Semi auto 600rpm (AVS36)
- IL2 can both bomb and dominate the air (easy kill stukas)
People complain about normandy to be the most unballanced but they are so wrong. The weakest faction, the USA have rockets against tanks, have the best attack plane in the game, have a Tank that can tank anything, M2 for all footman, brownings, etc…
Moscow is just one sided because the German best strategie is to suicide charge with a lots of troop or a stuka, to move forward.
10 Likes
The most frustrating thing with Moscow Axis is this:
- 6 different version of Panzer III
- 3 different version of Panzer IV
And both of them get OS by a T34, or a T28.
Can not pen a T34.
Can only pen one pixel of the lvl 1 gold order T50.
2 Likes
Berlin is pretty unbalanced too … same shit until level 30 russian have ALL better stuff than you
1 Like
I would say Stalingrad is the most unbalanced.
There you have maps favoring allies as well until the sides get randomized.
That one invasion map where you have to start attacking across railroad tracks and wide open space so most of your teammates are sitting in the spawn having a sniper duel with half of the other team.
Flanking works but the map is a mile wide so it takes a ton of time to get started, and requires more than one person building rallies to be effective.
In the end game, the Axis is better in my opinion.
1 Like
Stalingrad is not worth to debate right now.
Best I can do is 67 games of this shitty campaign.
I will not spend more time their before the next big update.
1 Like
Yeah but XP 30 levels with bots and f**cked up balance is kinda disgusting
2 Likes
you are talking about Berlin or Moscow axis?