I played a lot for the AXIS. I didn’t feel threatened by the men in cuirasses.
Although for a bad player like you, even the Nagan revolver is a formidable weapon.
5 Likes
With enough glitches I can make it somewhat redundant but I can’t do it for the masses
If it’s not a problem then everyone else can have it or we could just remove it altogether
I doubt that’s gonna happen or we could just remove it from the game altogether
You’re not even trying to break the game so I would not really acknowledge your answer here
You mean, using exploits to farm exp like you? No, I’m not doing that.
1 Like
I only did it for the event and when I mean game breaking glitches it’s to go up against sweat Lords and it means I don’t have to go around looking for a hack client if I wanna fight them.
Wait a minute. So you’re saying that while I’m trying to win, you’re doing nothing, right? You need to learn how to play. instead of trying to limit the players that make you win.
Even if the cuirass doesn’t protect you, you’ll still be a ballast.
1 Like
This has nothing to do with the conversation.
It’s not my fault you don’t know how to use it right and I’m not here to teach you.
You’re the only one who cares about it. Just because you can’t cope with an insignificant 10% damage reduction to the chest in a game where TtK is already extremely fast, doesn’t mean the devs should remove it from the game.
3 Likes
best thing to show how body armor is effective is to actually provide graphs
here are graphs for fully upgraded guns
Spoiler
basic soldier
basic soldier with body armor
soldier with vitality perk
soldier with vitality+armor
here are graphs for stock weapons
I think you know already know armor and helmet Just work aganaist pistol rigth? Because the other gun Just do to much DPS for care of 10% damage reduction, so outside for make soldier look cool, they dont have impact on the gameplay
4 Likes
it is not really that simple. check graphs above.
1 Like
I really dont understand the scrutiny.
Body armor only really effective against pistols on any meaningfull damage drop.
I have encountered armored soldiers and had no dificulties killing them.
And this is also very his. Accurt. since body armor was primarily supposed to be effective against sharapnels not bullets.
1 Like
Is thath simple
The graphs shows exactly that. In few secs, you are dead nevertheless.
On close distance, majority of people aims for the head anyway.
nah it isnt. if soviet soldier has vitality+armor, fg42 II would need 2 bullets at all ranges. but with only vitality fg42 II needs 1 bullet up to 40-50m. then you have mp40 that is can kill with 2 bullets on 10m with only vitality, but needs 3 bullets with vitality+armor.
you have forgot that there is damage dropoff with range.
2 Likes
maybe skilled players do, but not majority of enlisted players.
2 Likes
Well, I believe majority of PC players do. It’s base fps instinct. And I highly doubt Enlisted is first fps game for significant part of its playerbase.
considering skills of average enlisted player i dont know how you can make this kind of statement 
1 Like