why british soldiers can’t have this helmet with camouflage? aaaaa
Because it’s unique premium squad customization.
It’s also been seen on the at gunner 1 when you go to recruit one
WTF? Why? This is AT riflemans helmet from Tunisia campaign.
I was not talking about the one with leaves. But the the one from the first picture.
I guess I misunderstood what he meant.
Ah netting, and netting with leaves, truly a unique peice of gear that only the Moroccans used, no one ever used nets on their desert helmets either that’s also fake news.



Devs added new colors of robes and new models of helmets. But they did not add anything that would allow them not to look like a band of Arabian clowns in Europe.
How is this in any relevant to how the customization system works in this game?
You mean to tell me that cosmetics in game are not based on real world uniforms, and that common gear usually gets made into commonly worn items in game?
I’m shocked, truly.
Of course, all of this also leaves out that the glaring oversight that Brits truly are underrepresented in gear options compared to everyone else, excluding Italian units (and arguably Japan if we count all campaigns combined, but really it should be campaign to campaign comparisons and then Japan has more).
No, I said customization system.
So again:
What’s your point? I don’t get it, both helmet options should be available that’s my stance, and that’s impossible? Is this a code difficulty, why am I supposed to answer for this?
It is not
But devs deliberately decided to make them limited.
And whether they were common or not in terms of historical context literally plays no role. So using that as an argument is completely pointless.
Like Suppressed weapons then?
How about not appealing to authority, especially when you don’t agree with them most of the time, logical fallacy.
Actually it does, that’s how these decisions get made when more context is added, this wouldn’t be the first time DF makes previously limmited cosmetics commonly available, you’re acting like there’s no precedent for this.
If that was the case, these helmets would have been available long ago xD
It’s like you’re literally in outright denial of reality. There’s nothing more to say to that.
First the system has to be changed so that what you think is important plays a role. Until then, it’s completely pointless to keep making arguments that plays literally no role in the current system.
But if that’s you want to waste you time with. Okay. Good luck with that.
If that was the case, these helmets would have been available long ago xD
You’re assuming it’s a deliberate choice rather than a oversight, which there are many of in the game, oh so many even if you just look at cosmetics availability.
First the system has to be changed so that what you think is important plays a role. Until then, it’s completely pointless to keep making arguments that plays literally no role in the current system.
“You can’t argue for a change until the change has happened.”
No, I’ll argue for the change, thanks, and wait to see it happen. Is that okay for you if I do it in that order?
You’re assuming it’s a deliberate choice rather than a oversight
I don’t assume a shtt. Many forum members already disputed current customization system for years, complained about rare uniform (in historical context) being available in standard customization, meanwhile common uniforms being locked behind premium/event squad.
“You can’t argue for a change until the change has happened.”
No, I’ll argue for the change, thanks, and wait to see it happen. Is that okay for you if I do it in that order?
Again, you’re twisting context and then trying to argue something I didn’t say.
I just said that your argument is foolish in the current context. I didn’t say you can’t keep using it. It’s just very naive.