I like the new lapland war panzer 4 skin
4 Likes
Fun note, as I know this one shouldnât have an MG because those was removed for make the main gun fit inside the hull⊠Also was never taked in consideration for get produced, because of to much reocoil and lack of anti infantry defense, and soon forgotten because of the T44 once the war was over
But anyway Iâm not aganaist it, if it shoot faster than the IS2 is more than good
1 Like
The tank was an outright failure that destroyed itself upon firing so it shouldnât exist in game at all
4 Likes
Thatâs just a proud tradition at this point, hello Sniper Stg 44 etc.
1 Like
Pretty sure AVT 40 wrecked itself in full auto too and a few others, but still around
Haha
2 Likes
At least it was built and tested unlike the Ho-Ri, but it will be a premium anyway so not many will appear in matches.
1 Like
YYEEEESSS!!! 
Holy Kingtiger, this is so beautiful. Give a raise to the visual artist. Chromatic aberration, lens distortion, dirt texture, vignette from ambient occlusion, everything I dreamt of, itâs finally there. Iâm gonna play tanks 2x more frequently just to look through the tank optics.
Thanks for accepting my suggestion
This is perfection for me, please donât ever change it (or make the scope clarity adjustable in the settings for the players who donât want it)
I hope in the future we can also get mouse wheel support for smooth zooming in/out
12 Likes
Iâll never understand how peopleâs brains work on prototypes and fake stuff.
It was literally discarded as âno we are not gonna make itâ but somehow adding it to a ww2 game is ok now.
2 Likes
yay test server, finally i can test BP weapons bcs main game wonât let me 
about bipodsâŠ
iâm having weird issue, when deployed i canât look around smoothly, it keeps twitching, canât do fast turns.
also some weapons behave strange, the sigths go up very harsh, dunno if itâs intended tho
also my day is ruined:
why on earth bipods has to increase dispersion :<
9 Likes
The view really moves in a weird direction after recoil on each of these weapons 
3 Likes
Iâll try a test version and write my impressions.
Character customization
Good.
1.Purchased costumes can now be used in another campaign.
Purchased costumes can apparently be used regardless of the campaign.
If this is the intended change, this is a nice change.
For example, if I purchase a beret for my British soldier in Normandy, it can be used in Tunisia. However, to use it in both campaigns at the same time, you need to buy two pieces.
Thanks to this change, it looks like this bug I reported last year will finally be fixed.
A large number of clothes I bought in Normandy were transferred to the Pacific and no longer available.
A purchased cosmetic item has disappeared. // Gaijin.net // Issues
BAD.
1.The face customization of American soldiers is inconsistent.
The customization of the faces of American soldiers is not consistent between Normandy and Pacific. Clothing purchased in Normandy can be used in the Pacific as mentioned above, but not faces, and faces purchased in Normandy/Valaisi cannot be used in the Pacific/Tunisia.
Other Factions do not change faces in the campaign. Only American soldiers have custom faces of different strains in Normandy and Pacific, and they are not compatible with both.
I have also posted this issue on CBR.
Facial customization is disabled after changing campaigns // Gaijin.net // Issues
2.Pants are not customizable in Pacific.
The pants of American soldiers in the Pacific are not customizable.
Previously, the Pacific sold costumes with the jacket and pants as one piece.
In the new version the pants have been removed from the costume and also there is no item to customize the pants.
Bipod/Resting
Certainly more comfortable than the previous version!
However, if you do it with a gun other than the LMG, the rear sight jumps up too much, making AIming impossible.
I think itâs a bug, what do you think?
Also, the Thompson does not allow Resting the gun in some positions.
I havenât tried the other guns, but Iâm sure there are glitches with some of them
I would like to see it fixed a little bit so that all guns can Resting with sandbags, etc.
4 Likes
This is my event paratrooper (that I armed with a sabre already)
All uniform options have this dark emerald green uniform underneath the outer camo outfit, everytime with the same cooler with 2 stripes (this is not luftwaffe, right? 
)
2 Likes
If testing is a thing I donât understand how the mine bugs is not fixed yet
The dispersion increases terribly when I mount my weapon (this bug is now like 2 years old, or maybe more). One of the shots went over without hitting the board and itâs not even the farthest target. The weapon is maxed out.
6 Likes
any other new vehicles spotted besides this and T-34-100??
1 Like
I think both the AVT and AVS broke themselves apart upon full auto yeah
It opens the door for my wishlisted vehicle too
The T29
1 Like
Again what are people smoking??
Are u talking about the ZiS-100? D-10-34? or the LB-1 guns? Sorces???
Trials showed good stability of the tank during shooting, low recoil force of the gun and therefor good accuracy. The T-34-100 armed with the LB-1 was recomended to accept for service. However, the time of the T-34 run out and, in March 1945, the first prototype of the T-54 tank was introduced for trials.
https://battlefield.ru/t34_100.html
The amount of bird crap flying around this forum sometimes
Hell first T-54 mounted the LB1, they liked it so much
4 Likes
The T-34-100
Go take a look at the old War Thunder forums for when they talked about it when it was added
1 Like
Cool so yes infact ur talking about the Zis-100 not the LB-1 gun.
Glad to know we can learn something from fact-checking. The enlisted model and WT one both use the stable, low recoil LB-1. 
1 Like