Testing expanded BR for maps

[ErikaKalkbrenner]

@Adamnpee

I don’t see why people shouldn’t complain about a change that is, by definition, completely unnecessary. And nothing at all would have happened if things had stayed the way they were.

i got carried away i suppose.

so, i’m not against people not liking this test phase.

it’s in their right to do so.

" I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It "

it’s completely fine.

but for someone to use the HA excuses in 2025 it is borderline useless, and kinda dumb.
especially on these maps.

it’s just a straw man argument and shows how some people are completely out of touch.
like realistically, this game is not historical accurate.
you may disapprove with your " immersion " type of argument, which it’s okay, but still subjective.
and as it goes for this type of test, objectivity is what matter.

otherwise it just causes futile conversations.
if you really want any of that, go support custom content and customs games / editor in general.
yet you don’t see them.

so really shows how they really care uh.

@Adamnpee

Therefore, I can only address this testing from the perspective that something like a preferred map system might not even exist.
Because I simply can’t put it in the right context.

And I definitely do not want lose ability to avoid Tunisia maps.

personally, i’m not sure of any of that will work.
( i probably have skipped that message. )

and that’s completely fine.

but looking for something that isn’t designed to be, not so much.

that’s all

( also, i did enjoyed high br tunisia and moscow. but i’m not going to cry over if those will stay at low br )

[_kent]

No matter how the game loses its fans, the new selection of cards is terrible.

[Comrade_Sina]

At least he finished the battle and got good score and finally won. but you? You ran away.
From ParaDivison video:

[Adamnpee]

@ErikaKalkbrenner

but for someone to use the HA excuses in 2025 it is borderline useless, and kinda dumb.
especially on these maps.

Yeah, I think so too.

Low BRs are full of equipment that’s mid war and later. We have more VS stuff on lower BR than we have on high BR.
So if they realistically want to work on HA to reflect map pool. They should first make BRs reflect the years of deployment in the first place. Until then addressing HA correlation with maps makes no sense at all.

[CaptainSebekel]

@Comrade Sina

At least he finished the battle

In stack, what a proud hero.
He should get the Medal of Honor.

[Comrade_Sina]

We don’t need to give medals to real soldiers, we need to execute deserters, those who say on the forum that this change is good and run away from the same battle in the game.

[CaptainSebekel]

@Comrade Sina

We don’t need to give medals to real soldiers

You larp too much.
Besides, people should not be impressed by parapleb playing stack and not deserting. That is not impressive. That is pathetic.

@Comrade Sina

those who say on the forum that this change is good and run away from the same battle in the game.

Why though?

[KeTTka_B_TaTTkaX]

“Why make 3 map a year for 3 different BR categories (low, medium and high) if you can make 1 map a year that will fit all of these BRs”

[ErikaKalkbrenner]

they can simply make " cards " regardless of where those would fit and eventually give them to all brs?

like… they already have done for the pacific, ardenne, and rzhev ?

[Comrade_Sina]

I think you need a little rest, stay away from the forum for a while.

[CaptainSebekel]

Big words for someone who wants to “execute” deserters.

[Hanxi_Channel]

I appreciate all the efforts of editors and mods, but I really feel like I’ve been mistaken for others (as I’m sure that I didn’t really say things like to change the TT of certain factions for HisAcc or HArdcore, etc.).

Anyway, the reason why I don’t like this change (or test) is it disrupted my normal plans of grinding the events (like T-34/85 is better fight in cities not plains; especially it is expected not everyone like this test).

@Adamnpee

I would even say that Stalingrad is much more iconic for me than Berlin.

So I suppose the common standard excluding the preferences here is somewhere was seen as a battleground on screens, as surely there won’t be any Russians living a city named Stalingrad now (or Tatooine).
(could be a thought in making new maps for being easy and referenced)

[Comrade_Sina]

Don’t be afraid, no one is going to execute you.

[CaptainSebekel]

Hehe How funny… at least it made you laugh.

[ErikaKalkbrenner]

@Hanxi_Channel

I appreciate all the efforts of editors and mods, but I really feel like I’ve been mistaken for others (as I’m sure that I didn’t really say things like to change the TT of certain factions for HisAcc or HArdcore, etc.).

no, i am not mistaking you for someone else.

i just tried to back up my argument regarding our initial point.

beside, just some convo

@Hanxi_Channel

Anyway, the reason why I don’t like this change (or test) is it disrupted my normal plans of grinding the events (especially it is expected not everyone like this test).

and that, is a valid point.

although, i think it was " forced " as a test to gather more opinions opposed as being an event.

which, not sure how many would have tested it / joined.

so perhaps it is indicative of how well received it would have been / it is

[Adamnpee]

I don’t know what you’re talking about. Anyone who has any interest in WW2 and the Eastern Front is very familiar with at least some iconic buildings of Stalingrad.

[GeneralBrus]

@Conte_Baracca

It’s just that this number is lesser than the number who want more diversity in gameplay.

Doubt - Less players want King Tiger in Moscow for sure.

[Comrade_Sina]

I finished BP and did all the event tasks yesterday, I have no reason to play today and I think this is the first day after 160 days. Good job Snail.

[GeneralBrus]

@Hanxi_Channel

(like T-34/85 is better fight in cities not plains;

Never understood this statement - what makes T34 better at fighting in cities? If anything K1 or Matilda are cool for city combat because their frontal and side armor is practically the same.

Panthers are total trash in cities because they have BR1 side armor and crippled reverse speed.

T34 seem very balanced at all environments.

[Hanxi_Channel]

You are right about side armor (and anti-infantry defence, I suppose).

My reason is, the turret armor of T-34/85 is better than its chassis armor, and in Tank vs Tank combats there are barricades in cities for T-34 to hide its relatively weak chassis, so helps survivability.

@Adamnpee

Anyone who has any interest in WW2 and the Eastern Front is very familiar with at least some iconic buildings of Stalingrad.

Then it’s simply about personal knowledge and preferences.