they can simply make " cards " regardless of where those would fit and eventually give them to all brs?
like… they already have done for the pacific, ardenne, and rzhev ?
I think you need a little rest, stay away from the forum for a while.
Big words for someone who wants to “execute” deserters.
1 Like
I appreciate all the efforts of editors and mods, but I really feel like I’ve been mistaken for others (as I’m sure that I didn’t really say things like to change the TT of certain factions for HisAcc or HArdcore, etc.).
Anyway, the reason why I don’t like this change (or test) is it disrupted my normal plans of grinding the events (like T-34/85 is better fight in cities not plains; especially it is expected not everyone like this test).
So I suppose the common standard excluding the preferences here is somewhere was seen as a battleground on screens, as surely there won’t be any Russians living a city named Stalingrad now (or Tatooine).
(could be a thought in making new maps for being easy and referenced)
1 Like
Don’t be afraid, no one is going to execute you. 
Hehe How funny… at least it made you laugh.
no, i am not mistaking you for someone else.
i just tried to back up my argument regarding our initial point.
beside, just some convo 
and that, is a valid point.
although, i think it was " forced " as a test to gather more opinions opposed as being an event.
which, not sure how many would have tested it / joined.
so perhaps it is indicative of how well received it would have been / it is 
I don’t know what you’re talking about. Anyone who has any interest in WW2 and the Eastern Front is very familiar with at least some iconic buildings of Stalingrad.
5 Likes
Doubt - Less players want King Tiger in Moscow for sure.
2 Likes
I finished BP and did all the event tasks yesterday, I have no reason to play today and I think this is the first day after 160 days. Good job Snail.
3 Likes
Never understood this statement - what makes T34 better at fighting in cities? If anything K1 or Matilda are cool for city combat because their frontal and side armor is practically the same.
Panthers are total trash in cities because they have BR1 side armor and crippled reverse speed.
T34 seem very balanced at all environments.
1 Like
You are right about side armor (and anti-infantry defence, I suppose).
My reason is, the turret armor of T-34/85 is better than its chassis armor, and in Tank vs Tank combats there are barricades in cities for T-34 to hide its relatively weak chassis, so helps survivability.
Then it’s simply about personal knowledge and preferences.
After playing a few games on BR5 as the rus, it is really enjoyable to play as the attacking side or on confrontation mode, but miserable as the defending side. This change actually magnifies the trash design of Attack/defend.
With this change, I believe there will be more people disconnecting as soon as they find out that they are playing as the defenders, and will accelerate the demise of this game.
1 Like
In between the petty squabbling of some people, before this post gets derailed again…
BR4 Sov against BR5 in Moscow, the map with that long road in between the points, KT2 annihilated our team, sat in grey zone, bombed it came back again (Big Action got me used to seeing Moscow as any tier)
2x Tunisia BR4 Axis with Tiger, against Sherman 76, was fun fight both times, mainly as I was in tiger in Tunisia! I don’t think BR5 should be there…
Just give us preferred maps, with enough options to chose what BR and map we want to play, win win
I do think what someone said about BR5 being standalone, 3/4, 1/2 is a better test…
Some maps are better than others for bigger toys…
If you give us preferred maps at same time, everyone could control what they wanted to see / play, less rep damage.
1 Like
I think they would actually LOVE to do this. Question is player numbers and thus, queue times.
On the upside, I love playing Berlin maps in my BR2 lineups. More diversity of maps is a good thing.
I hope what we see out of this is every map for every BR except no Tunisia for BR V. And no Quarry for BR V. I just like the diversity in maps.
My official feedback is:
BR 3 and below in Berlin is fantastic and should stay.
The rest I don’t really have an opinion on.
The problem is that even if Darkjin introduce “preferred maps”, I’m pretty sure it’s going to be something like “ban 1 map without premium and 2 maps with premium!!”
And the “map” will be something like Beloe Lake Assault West, while Beloe Lake Assault East will count as a separate “map”.
But even if they let us ban “maps” like Stalingrad in general – what’s the point?
I don’t want to ban it.
I love Stalingrad on BR 1-3.
But I will never ever play it on BR 4-5.
So the only viable option is BR/map combination bans.
However, instead of that we should just make the map distribution not insane:
10 Likes
You could collect player opinions in-game post-match for those who enable it (so they should go to options and click, and the question should be after all the scoring to let the adrenaline levels fall). A question how much I enjoyed on a scale of 1-5, why yes/not, with some default answers and another text field limited at 80 characters so I can’t rant much?
4 Likes
I find it an immersion killer and makes the gaming experience rubbish. The fun and sense of identification are completely lost.
Tiger 2 and IS 2 on Moscow. Ridiculous!!!
Why do you even bother to recreate battlefields historically accurately and put so much effort into details?
The idea of lumping everything together is completely counterproductive to the game’s original DNA. What’s next? A pink silencer as a weapon upgrade? Or a unicorn logo for squads?
My feedback to the publisher and their managers: if you implement this permanently, many long-serving players will feel cheated out of their real-money investments in the game.
What’s your strategy behind this? Destroy the work of your last few years with a single hit? Do you want to get rid of the remaining players as well? Or do you want even more people to leave freshly started matches and thus further ruin the gaming experience for those who remain?
10 Likes
Shameless plug into the Reddit post I made about the map changes:
https://www.reddit.com/r/enlistedgame/s/tf56f70EFy
TLDR is that locking maps to BRs has its own benefits, opening maps to all BRs discourages map-making efforts, and instead maps should be linked to a wide BR spectrum (BR1-3, 2-4 and 3-5), specially as more maps get added the map variety problem decreases.
4 Likes
Ok, let’s test “expanded BR for maps”
I want to play as BR4 Germany (Tiger and Panther)
I will NOT play maps where Panther wasn’t used:
Game 1 Tunisia - QUIT
(screenshot didn’t save)
Game 2 Moscow - QUIT
Game 3 Moscow - QUIT
Game 4 Moscow - QUIT
Game 5 Tunisia - QUIT
How am I suppossed to play now?
8 Likes