ahh I hope so there is maps that I love but some I absolutely hate xD
Ah then I would adjust your suggestion a little:
-Moscow I-II (III maybe but better not because Pz IV H/J, etc.)
-Stalingrad I-III
-Tunisia I-III (not IV because Panther, Sherman 76mm, STG-45, etc.)
-Rzhev I-III (not IV because IS-1, T-34-85, Panther, Sherman 76mm, STG-45, etc.)
-Normandy III-V
-Ardenes III-V
-Berlin III-V
Bad idea, if anything Normandie and Hurtgen should be moved to BR 3-4 and 4-5. Even if historical authenticity doesnât matter anymore, it is annoying get the same maps and missions at every BR.
Getting more maps set/campaigns should be number 1 priority (aside bug fixes) we lack stuff like soviet steppes/villages in summer or spring, Italian/Mediterranean front, Dunkirk, Caen, Carentan, Market Garden, Okinawa, Iwo Jima, etc. If it is too much work start thinking about modular generic maps where you can change the seasons and biomes.
BR 5 on those maps are straight up stupid. Iâm either dead to a P-47, Jet, or tank. No room to move at all.
I havenât gotten a 200 kill game in a year or two and almost got one at br4 in Moscow with a KV-1 zis-5
My first game today btw
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Berlin okay makes sense due to what the Russians and Germans was armed at the time but MOSOCW AND TUNISA? Br4-5? Thatâs a terrible idea only person that would come up this that is a person who only play⊠tanks and planes⊠i know who
Thereâs âBattlefield,â which will completely satisfy your need for casualness and âvariety,â at the expense of removing the historical accuracy you hate so much.
You know what the real problem is now?
@MajorMcDonalds
I can not use my XP boosters.
At all.
Before I would always use them with BR2 âany nationâ setups because I donât risk getting Stalingrad/Rzhev with BR3-4 BR4-5, as I quit those games 100%.
Now I can never use my XP boosters safely because there is always a chance I will need to quit an insanity like BR1 Berlin or BR5 Tunisia.
Soviet BR5 with you MM would be Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin or Berlin. Do you want to make them all go insane? They are already at brink of insanity from playing only three campaigns 24/7.
Enlisted: lets just throw crap on a wall and see what sticks.
well I do believe there is still a way to make volkssturm gear balanced even in high BR - but people dont seems to like âcontroversialâ mechanics.
Map selection would satisfy both HA fanatics and people that want more map variety all across the BRs. Make all maps available at all BRs and let us pick which ones we want to play.
Nothing stops the devs from adding Bagration, Konigsberg, Vienna, Budapest, Prague, or of they are lazy: Belarus, Ukraine, Baltics, Poland, Central Europe â any of those generic maps.
Nothing except Gaijin killing DF and replacing them with Gaijin skeleton team and a bit of outsourcing. At this rate i doubt if we are even going to see more than one new map a year. Your suggestion of maps would take about 10-20 years with current Gaijin finesse and funding.
what about Japan lol
Either put Stalingrad to br 1â2 and Tunisia to br 1-4
Or just give us map selection
Why not just add Königsberg? Itâs asking to be included, itâs trying to get into our game, but instead of adding it, theyâre just pushing hack work at us, and some are happy that theyâre being given something to eat, not paying attention to the fact that this food is feces.
Well, I was already suggesting artificially adjusting weapon stats based on the year they were deployed when the pre merge debates were going on.
But people never liked the idea. So I have no clue why theyâre not happy with current state of things. Thatâs what they wanted.
So my only issue with this change is Tunisia. The campaign has terrible maps. And thus it should be heavily limited in MM queues.
Japan is living through a dream of new campaigns where they will fight vs Soviets. Only this thought is keeping them sane, and also daily training regime with Type 97 at rifle.