BR 5 on those maps are straight up stupid. I’m either dead to a P-47, Jet, or tank. No room to move at all.
I haven’t gotten a 200 kill game in a year or two and almost got one at br4 in Moscow with a KV-1 zis-5
My first game today btw
Berlin okay makes sense due to what the Russians and Germans was armed at the time but MOSOCW AND TUNISA? Br4-5? That’s a terrible idea only person that would come up this that is a person who only play… tanks and planes… i know who
There’s “Battlefield,” which will completely satisfy your need for casualness and “variety,” at the expense of removing the historical accuracy you hate so much.
5 Likes
You know what the real problem is now?
@MajorMcDonalds
I can not use my XP boosters.
At all.
Before I would always use them with BR2 “any nation” setups because I don’t risk getting Stalingrad/Rzhev with BR3-4 BR4-5, as I quit those games 100%.
Now I can never use my XP boosters safely because there is always a chance I will need to quit an insanity like BR1 Berlin or BR5 Tunisia.
3 Likes
Soviet BR5 with you MM would be Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Berlin or Berlin. Do you want to make them all go insane? They are already at brink of insanity from playing only three campaigns 24/7.
2 Likes
Enlisted: lets just throw crap on a wall and see what sticks.
9 Likes
well I do believe there is still a way to make volkssturm gear balanced even in high BR - but people dont seems to like “controversial” mechanics.
1 Like
Map selection would satisfy both HA fanatics and people that want more map variety all across the BRs. Make all maps available at all BRs and let us pick which ones we want to play.
4 Likes
Nothing stops the devs from adding Bagration, Konigsberg, Vienna, Budapest, Prague, or of they are lazy: Belarus, Ukraine, Baltics, Poland, Central Europe – any of those generic maps.
4 Likes
Nothing except Gaijin killing DF and replacing them with Gaijin skeleton team and a bit of outsourcing. At this rate i doubt if we are even going to see more than one new map a year. Your suggestion of maps would take about 10-20 years with current Gaijin finesse and funding.
1 Like
what about Japan lol
Either put Stalingrad to br 1–2 and Tunisia to br 1-4
Or just give us map selection
1 Like
Why not just add Königsberg? It’s asking to be included, it’s trying to get into our game, but instead of adding it, they’re just pushing hack work at us, and some are happy that they’re being given something to eat, not paying attention to the fact that this food is feces.
1 Like
Well, I was already suggesting artificially adjusting weapon stats based on the year they were deployed when the pre merge debates were going on.
But people never liked the idea. So I have no clue why they’re not happy with current state of things. That’s what they wanted. 
So my only issue with this change is Tunisia. The campaign has terrible maps. And thus it should be heavily limited in MM queues.
Japan is living through a dream of new campaigns where they will fight vs Soviets. Only this thought is keeping them sane, and also daily training regime with Type 97 at rifle.
2 Likes
Like make berlin a br2-5 map exclude br1 for reasons but revert the Moscow and Tunisia thing it’s such a horrible idea I think I might skip the North Africa event if you also mess up br
They are much easier to destroy.
Give us an ability to ban maps like this and then we might talk. Others can do whatever they want.
Otherwise no I will not drive my T-26 around Berlin lmfao
No.
3 Likes
Why? You pulled it to BR4 just because of the Tiger H1? Almost 90% of people use the Panther, which has no place in Tunisia.
Spamming MG 42 100, FG42, etc. won’t be interesting either. Those weapons weren’t designed for Moscow and Tunisia, BR5 weapons are laser beams.