Playerbase is constantly shifting in Enlisted and faction trends are ever changing.
faction A may dominate today but next month it will be faction B.
This is totally normal and I wouldn’t want it anyother way, but all factions must stay enjoyable to play with.
I’m not asking for any handicapping, because that never worked (I´m looking at you, capture time).
However I don’t like one-sided battles and stomps either, it’s never fun for anyone.
At this moment, US and USSR players heavily outnumber Axis players and sadly, also exploit that they can only fight Germany on BR5.
Please consider temporarily adding a US vs USSR map to MM, I’m advising this out of practical reasons.
Ideally match making would only create US vs USSR battles when there aren’t enough Axis players queuing.
reducing MM que time, adding maps and adding new enemies to shoot at while improving game balance is a win-win.
Once Japan gets its BR5 equipment and underdog faction bonus gets implemented or any other solution that ends victory farming.
This scenario should be pulled out of MM and reserved for custom games and events.
If the tables turn and victory farming is yet to be solved, I would also wholeheartedly support a Germany vs Japan scenario.
Please consider temporarily adding a US vs USSR map to MM, I’m advising this out of practical reasons.
Ideally match making would only create US vs USSR battles when there aren’t enough Axis players queuing.
reducing MM que time, adding maps and adding new enemies to shoot at while improving game balance is a win-win.
no, why U.S. and Soviet troops never fought each other directly during those years . But numerous Cold War-related conflicts raged across the globe from the 1940s to the 1980s. The vast bulk of those conflicts occurred in the developing countries of Asia, Africa and the Middle East – the so-called Third World or Global South.
Not a bad idea, but would take longer than just creating an insensitive to play underdog faction.
Besides, many in the community wants Enlisted to stay WW2 for now.
If you are going to have US fight USSR you might as well have alternate history, operation sea lion, japan invading pearl harbor with land troops, Spain as a faction, Mexico as a German ally, so no no no god no
Battle of Mutanchiang will be interesting it will be a city battle with Japan something we don’t have in the pacific + many many more unique map options.
I totally disagree with this suggestion, enlisted is a game based on the second world war, not a call of duty. What sense does it make for the USA to face the USSR? Or that Germany faces Japan? I understand the point of balancing teams but that’s not a way.
One way is to add maps where the USSR faces Japan, it would be much more logical since both armies did fight each other and belonged to different sides.
If enlisted were to mix the battles (USA VS USSR, GERMANY VS JAPAN etc.) it would no longer be a game based on the Second World War, but a very different game with a WW2 theme.
I wouldn’t mind an operation unthinkable too. Though this is alt history of course. But we already got some questionable weapons in game anyways… So, what’s really off the table at this point?
No offence but can the Devs fix the game without these crazy suggestions, Japan Vs Soviets ok, no Korea, let them keep nation opposites, this is not COD
