No, it is perfectly possible.
Just nerf fire rate on T-34 so it gets punished for missing its shot enough to make up for its better capabilities, and do not add the KV-1 as IT is impossible to balance.
I was joking… And that will be problem in every campaign until the very end of the war
Except… it is not.
All tanks in each campaign are capable of penetrating all other tanks in its campaign at least in ONE spot from the front.
So guess we aren’t going to see tigers ever…
In this SMG meta, that’s a big problem
But tanks are a different story. Tanks can be implemented in a realistic way
Germans get good AT weapons
Plus it bothers me how you speak in the name of community
But community disagrees with you and wants t-34. They even voted for it on your own poll
Dude… you lost.
It’s called democracy and deal with it
I don’t agree with @81161750 for KV1 but I do think we should have a t-34 with worse sights
Just like everyone else agrees
Not in the current campaigns that are planned, as that would be a bad idea.
I’ll explain how I see balance shortly: it’s pretty much the ability to counter each other
M8.
I never said I disagreed on adding the T-34, and with the better tanks I was mostly referring to the concept as a whole, and the addition of the KV-1.
Because if you nerf the T-34 to not be OP, it is not better. So as a result the balance isn’t really asymmetrical.
Is tiger 1 against churchill 3 balanced? No it isn’t even if the Churchill can pen the tiger
Than why are you throwing reasons for it to be removed
Just like adding the KV-1 is not balanced. Now you understand.
I am not. I am merely debunking his bullshit arguments as to why it does not need to be nerfed upon implementation, and his reasons to why the KV-1 should be implemented.
Yeah and about the every tank can pen each other, the M8 can’t pen anyone… (Maybe it got the HEAT but aj m pretty sure it doesn’t)
M8 is infantry support, similar to the pz3N
So why it’s in the place of a tank? Germany get Pz 3 N and the USA M8?
t-34 should have nerfed sights…and that’s it
30s of reload is too much even for unexperienced crew
Because the USA does not have any other options for a 75mm short barrel infantry support tank, other than the LVT with the same gun.
12-18 seconds reload would be fine, just not the war thunder 7.1 sec reload, just like how 4 sec reload on the pz4 is too fast and should be 6sec
M24 crying in the corner…
I’ll give it 11-12 seconds
18 is too much