T-28 is a big turn off

Also BR 3 tanks because all panzers have the same weakspot

1 Like

Nah

Tank Front plate
T-50 < 60mm effective thickness slope
PZ. III N 50+20mm
PZ. III J1 50mm
PZ. IV E 30+30mm
PZ. IV F1 50mm
HO-I 50mm

All those shortcomings are corrected on the E.

T28E might just be the best anti infantry vehicle of the entire game. And with normal shells it can battle other tanks of br1 to 3 easily.

bias


You know that T-28E’s APHE only have 67pen?
If not aiming for turret, PZIV J got 80mm and PZIV G got 50+30mm
PZIV F2 got 50. But I wonder who will use them.

The same weakspot IS the turret. All decent tankers know that they’re weak on axis tanks… especially in br 1 to 3

4 Likes

Are the T28E MGs still broken? A few weeks ago I had serveral games where its MGs didnt deal any damage. Saw the enemy squads shaking from the hits, but they didnt die.
So I put them out of duty.

That is very misleading.
All of the panzers have 50mm armour on the turret except Panzer III M (70-50) and Panzer IV E which only has 30.

The turret is always the most reliable target because the hull can be angled.
Most Axis players on BR2 will typically play Panzer II, III J and M, IV E and Puma.
The angled T-50 hull is almost impervious to all except the Puma while Panzers are forced to pixel the turret checks.

1 Like

It is not difficult to use 75mm kwk36 apcbc to penetrate the T-50 turret, and the allowable range is very large.
That’s how we fight T-50 in old moscow campaign.

for other 50mms even PZ III J can just pen the front plate.

T-28 is dogshit, paper-thin armor and horrible against tanks. T-28E fixes these issues, as it gets the APHE (iirc) and the armor upgrade, making it one of the best tanks in the game for its BR.

They are unfortunately

T-28 is probably the best use as an APC like ki-chi

1 Like

I think the T-50 is vastly under-rated.

(the rest of this post is just general thoughts on these tanks.)

It has better armor than the T-28E and there’s no weakspot - it’s 37MM all the way around, except underneath and the top. It has ammo for days, and it’s stupidly fast. If you get caught by an explosive while in a T-50, you deserve it.

The trick on the T-50 is to basically not stop moving. If you treat it like a far more durable, and a bit slower Puma, you’ll have a lot of survivability and a lot of kills.

Re: the T-28E - it’s a good, but not great, tank. A lot probably depends on your play style. If you’re a gray zone camper, it’s quite good. If you go up into tight spots close to the cap point, you’re likely going to eat a lot of explosives or German tank shells, but you’ll also probably pick up 10-20 quick infantry kills with any luck/skill. A lot here also depends on the map and the game mode.

T-50 vs the T-28E: With HE, you’re going to be mostly a BB-gun with the T-50. If you get two kills with one HE shell, you’re doing good. The thing is, you have like 75 of them. With the T-28E, it has pretty good HE, particularly at closer ranges, and can generally get some of those sweet 5-6 infantry in one shell that other tanks like the Panzer III N and the Crusader often get. With Anti-tank shells, the T-50 is pretty good. I’ve taken out my share III Ns with them, but usually, I try to scoot out of the way and/or lure an enemy to come to me and get my fellow team-mates to blow it up. The T28-E can take out any equivalent enemy tank, but don’t try to sit there going shot for shot against the best German tanks. Until you are highly accurate, they will take you out with that crappy armor. Use terrain, surprise, mobility or, as mentioned, friendly infantry to assist with the stronger tanks.

I enjoy the heck out of baiting infantry in a T-50. It’s just stupidly quick.

I would encourage folks to try different tanks - and also to upgrade them so they are getting the full value of the tank in question. Don’t judge it based just on how much damage you are getting against the opponents best tanks, since that is not what you will be facing ALL the time. If you “get gud” you wil almost never face the best tanks or ones you are outclassed in, until you are ready for them. A fast tank can sneak around a larger, slower tank and pop them in the ass.

Again, YMMV.

1 Like

What?

Turret cheeks are all weak on panzers III/IV (except panzer III M premium). Thats not bias, that is fact. Why would you go on about Hull shots…

67 pen will get it done “everytime”. The 150 HE filler does the rest

Any tanker worth his salt will know this and 1 shot panzers all day long in the t-28e (anyone that doesnt know this, really shouldnt be commenting)

Hull weakspots can be hidden behind obsticles, turret cheeks are always a target if you are.

The Term “Pixel” shot for turret cheeks (on most tanks with this weakness) is misused. Cheek shots arent hard or pixels.

If i have to make a montage of farming all br 1-3 tanks in a t-28e… i will

The T28 series are just bad big coffins
I suggest that you draw a tank with a 76 gun from the box
He has good speed and smoke grenades and armor-piercing grenades

You can also penetrate BR1-3 Panzers anywhere except for III M and N using the 45mm gun while Axis have to pixel hunt, IDK whats your problem.
If you don’t believe me than go do some comparisons in War Thunder.

1 Like

The Soviet T-28E can “one-shot” a German Pz. III N, and also has pretty good HE capabilities for taking out infantry. I think you’ll be surprised by how much better it is than the standard T-28. The T-50 is pretty good too; however, you can’t poke your head up to check out battlefield conditions—you’re basically in a sealed metal coffin.

3 Likes

Oh I see now you’re all talking T-50. One of the best early tanks in game. Sloped armor. Low profile. A demon. I have experienced the T-28 mg bug but I think its the map. Happens with other vehicles too.

is this a joke? T-28E not even close to this tank. Panzer III N an order of magnitude better than all BR2 tanks. Panzer III N place is on BR3.

Great HE with multiple MGs it’s actually better than PZ3N at fighting infantry.

No it’s not. At BR3 your weak cannon can’t pen overpowered KV-1 and T-34 even BR3 Axis tanks struggle to pen overbuffed KV-1

Just for good measure, Im going to Post “one match” of a T-28 E doing everything you need it to do for BR 3 , which is the highest you can see “naturally”. (including blowing Up a Panzer IV G through binoculars “without” penetration indicator)

BR 3? pfft…As we say Downunder…“Yeah, Nah”.

Panzer III may be one of the strongest, If Not “theee” Strongest" BR 2 tank, BUT the T-28 E can do everything the 3N can do, and the Grant/lee isnt exactly lacking either…soooo…

  • Panzer 3N has its Rate of fire
  • T-28 has its nuke shells and machine guns
  • Grant has 2 cannons and decent armor

T-28 E is a beast. It just needs its MGs fixed from the patch breaking it.

2 Likes

yes, I believe it, because it’s absurd.
PZ3N has more armor, higher speed, faster gun reload, and has cumulative shells.
That’s why PZ3N the weakest tank. It makes sense.