Do you remember how thread was called?
The thing with WT is that it has a number of it’s own funny things, like fuse failure is never simulated, hmg producing spalling, ammunition quality is not a thing. WT has it’s own meta and I’m not sure if these devs have the same idea in mind.
100% agree be like war thunder, and no challenge, i would not either want 3rd person for tanks noe Air planes just need practice never thought i be ok in planes but now im meh ok tanks well 7 tanks in one match in Berlin is alot for me , but hope they will not a
i was in UAS match built a AT cannon using armor piercing ammo on the lightest german tank
SdKfz 234-2 Puma front shot would not pen 
also hit it where it was indicating Green for highting chance on pen but zero havent looked up on the Americans AT cannon Caliber, think its a M5 AT gun 3inch and says it was a 76.6 so if thats whats in Enlisted on the americans side then theres something wrong should of fully destroyed that SdKfz 234-2 Puma , or am i wrong on the AT gun? cant look at specs in game theres none for the at guns and littel info on most weaponry ect.
Armor models are simply fucked and the Puma acts like it’s a Maus occasionally.
1 Like
I still dont understant where u taking this. Forget anything about models or similar crap this weapon was made to kill crew not to damage anything. It creates a little hole and fill the inside the tank and burn the crew or kill it some other way u no need to hit anything important at all!
I mean u are right about some things but again, iam resping to that quote that someone told ne that i need to hit ammo rack with panzerfaust, i dont think it suppose work that way. But iam not super sure.
Thats not how HEAT works…
Tcat told you exactly how it does and you come back with:
Please don’t say someone else is wrong when you have no idea what you’re talking about. Because Tcat is very right with the analysis.
1 Like
I checked the wiki, maybe its missinformation there. Do u have source that it wont affect the crew but u have to actually hit the ammo rack to destroy the tank?
If it hits a crew member it will obviously do something to them. Its superheated metal. When the shell explodes upon contact with the hull, think of it like a laser. It only affects a small pinpoint. The only way you’re going to do major damage with one shot is by the superheated metal coming into contact with ammo or fuel, at which point it is so hot that it will immediately cook off the fuel or ammo.
I been asking about siurce because u are defending your friend here who claims that panzerfaust is apcr which is obviously bullcrap since its heat aka cummulative warheat. So please give me source othervise dont lecture me.
He never said it was APCR, he said:
Learn to read please.
Here, I’ll quote wiki since you’re too lazy to read:
An important factor in the penetration performance of a HEAT round is the diameter of the warhead. As the penetration continues through the armor, the width of the hole decreases leading to a characteristic fist to finger penetration, where the size of the eventual finger is based on the size of the original fist .
1 Like
I dont think its even similar but ok. Apcr is basicly a piece of metal going in and out but i wont fight over this i have just different opinion.
I mean heres a drawing showing the after effects of APHE and HEAT shells from an article made by the US Army and Popular Science in 1945, I’d describe that as pretty similar to APCR:
Nobody would be using any other type of any sort of AT ammunition if HEAT rounds would be so amazing, it’s a simple logic. In military terms, as long as weapon can pen the armor, it’s considered effective. No-one is expecting tanks to die from a single hit. Battles lasted long time too. When tank gets penned, crew either abandons it or skidadles back into cover, if panzerfaust can do that - job is done.