Instead of the adding historically accurate Chinese troop in Normandy, here’s some better immersion breaking and historically inaccurate ideas for a WW2 game that will sure disappoint us further:
• Fully fleshed British and Italian early to late war equipment sans gimmicky one and only prototype equipment
• In depth customization rework for soldiers
• Campaign appropriate base uniform so we never see historically accurate occurence of Chinese and Bedouin in Normandy or Volkssturm in Africa
We can also add these completely fictional maps:
• Early war Low Countries/French campaign
• Early/late war Polish campaign
• Crete campaign
• Italian campaign
• Balkans campaign
• Scandinavian campaign
• Manchuria campaign
• South East Asia campaign
• Alaskan campaign
I promise you by adding these changes you will be successful in creating the most historically inaccurate borderline repulsive WW2 game ever, beating Battlefield V!
12 Likes
I aint glazing enlisted but enlisted is better then that EA Slop, and they really stopped a NFS for it.
1 Like
Isnt it ww1? Or is it early ww2? Enlisted btw
should be 1941 to 1945 campaign wise
Yeah We should rather add Chinese faction with copy+paste tech tree that no one will play and split the MM further to save something that never existed in the first place or have no Chinese at all.
Sounds much better.
2 Likes
should just add something like “increase historical authenticity” option that makes chinese/french soldiers just use USA uniforms and voicelines outside of their original campaign (no french resistance in guadalcanal and no chinese volunteers in africa)
3 Likes
I do think in the future China could be added. It’s pretty ignored in WW2. China was basically Japan’s “Eastern Front”. Though it is true that the main issue is China’s abysmal Research Tree. Barely any industry and only a few lend lease vehicles.
But from a historical standpoint, again, it’s an entire theater of the war! If someone’s playing a historical shooter they should have at least some interest in history
But regardless I think if China is ever added it should be in the future because of its complications
1 Like
i know right? why would we add gimmicky contents that could rival both Squad 44 and Hell Let Loose (cringe games) when we can add something iconic for a WW2 game like none other than adding the Chinese in Europe and Africa? Also why bother adding historically inaccurate miniscule number of planes within the service of IJA and IJN when we can add mass fielded Ho Ri tanks?
1 Like
Because no one cares enough. If there is a market, it would already been exploited but even Chinese companies dont do it despite Chinese nationalistic tendencies.
From a historical standpoints, captured weapons should be part of arsenals of actions, but then that is suddenly the point where history does not matter… again…
1 Like
Just for fun, where were you when Normandy had Jumbos and M2 carbines and Moscow Panzer III Bs and the ZH?
You mean HLL with the Panther in Stalingrad?
And if you prefer these games, the painfully obvious solutions should be to play these games instead of doing the cingier version of Veekay45 all day.
1 Like
And didnt Squad 44 used to be PS that was dead for like years or so cause it was so popular that the devs went silent?
at least they’re not chinese fighting foreign wars when their homeland is literally under siege
all im asking is instead adding chinese contents that doesnt fit anywhere (not even with the currect pacific map collection), really, its better to add unexplored campaigns of WW2 with more variations of armaments from all major parties within current and future campaigns. and please for the love of God stop adding gimmicky stuff like japanese tiger, soviet/german jets when britain, italy, and france is absurdly underrepresented in the game. these three nations are desperate for more contents because they are literally under Allies and Axis faction.
tldr adding cringe ass chinese squad that don’t even have proper maps in game yet before adding UK, France, Italy, and maybe Poland is such a dick move
nothing i can do about time traveling equipments but at least they are utilized by their armies fighting their correct wars, not stupid shit like liu and chinese thompson being wielder by bunch of wongs getting used in the invasion of europe
1 Like
Doesnt make it more or less not-historical.
Yeah And that means no Chinese at all.
Well, the Chinese do it technically but that is too much.
All are already in game except for Poland?
Or do we needs more independent factions to kill the MM? Sounds good.
Ehh But ranting about the Chinese is more realistic or what given they are already ingame?
1 Like
stupid game don’t even have sense of direction anymore, they added whatever generated by chatGPT instead adding what the community asked. Lurk around the forum and you’ll see people asking stuff like more minor nation stuff for Allies and Axis, a new USSR-Japan matchmaking set in northern China.
shouldn’t be added just yet before the addition of mainland map (AND THEY SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED TO THE USSR INSTEAD OF USA) because for the love of God they didn’t fought in Burma nor Pacific island hopping
im so sorry that you have a hard time to understand that adding a nation doesn’t need to be new faction, it can be a new weapon and customization for existing factions (i.e. Australian weapon and skin for Allies and Finnish weapons and skin for Axis)
Is it just me or you don’t understand how sarcasm work?
2 Likes
It is a real shame. Pretty much everyone only cares about D-Day. Even the Italian Campaign is shadowed. But that shouldn’t stop this game from exploring history
Most of the time capturing weapons was situational. You happen to pick up some MG 42 in battle and carry it with you. America and Britain weren’t issuing out MG 42s and Stgs.
Germany’s vast captured arsenal makes sense because they literally conquered countries and their arsenals were absorbed. France made the MAS 38 as their new standard SMG and the majority of them were made and used by Germany. I’d say in this war the MAS was used by more Germans than French. Free French forces were primarily equipped by America and Britain
It’s like there’s nothing wrong giving Germany Belgian guns because I’m pretty sure Belgium is never going to be a playable faction lol
2 Likes
In what way? The road map progress is slow, but so far most stuff on it was implemented.
Never did anyways.
People also say we need Vietnam.
Very historical to put the Kuomintang Chinese into the Soviet TT even though they were majorly cooperating with the Allies.
And? British forces did not land on Guadalcanal either as far as I know and yet you can send Crusaders there but I ain’t see cringe-ass comments from you about that.
No, just that is stupid.
A new weapon that could technically used by everyone means everyone can use it regardless of squad nationality, I don’t know how historical it is that the Americans use Sten SMGs or MAS rifles they never used, but it does not sound.
Or reskinning American squads to French squads.
1 Like
read, I admitted that nothing can be done about weapon selection as it’s a game
im not referring to kuomintang. I’m referring to china that can include the PRC. Lets say we added KMT to the allies, in the end they will always fought anywhere but mainland china where they actually fought because Allies never operated there outside of the Flying Tigers. But if we hypothetically add PRC to the USSR there’s a slight chance of them actually fighting in china against japan on the account of USSR-Japan MM
but at least commonwealth forces were operating during the Island hopping campaigns mainly in Solomon islands and New Guinea, thus earning their place to be included in the wider Pacific map including some of the maps depicted in this game while chinese forces never fought anywhere but china. I reiterate nothing can be done about what equipment are used by the players but at least have some common sense not to include a chinese force who historically never ventured far from china suddenly fighting 69696969 miles away from their homeland
also read this, I advocated for even more detailed customization limitation per campaign
Bad comparison.
People also asked for a set of Italian maps or early France, but that does not require a new faction unless you are stupid and demand solo factions for the UK and France.
China makes no sense because it is a terrible faction to make, especially for a game like Enlisted.
Why only pick them if they mainly deployed captured Panzerfäuste, rocket launchers and MP40s?
1 Like
