Stop adding slop contents that no one asked for

now I am 100% sure that you are incapable of advanced thinking. nothing I argue will sway whatever rudimentary thoughts lacking nuances that is unfortunately lingering in your head if you can’t differentiate between incidental battlefield pick up and literal seizure of national arsenal.

you can’t even read the room that between giltburrito and i, we are dubious at best on the notion of adding china to the game

should be forced tbh, current chinese squads will never go, so the best we can do is just give them US skin everywhere but the Pacific, same treatment must be done with out of place guerilla squad with various degree of execution, bedouin robe included and every other squad with ultra niche uniform.

And you dont think. Mainland China maps would still mean Chineses in Normandy unless you magically block them from certain maps, which would be effectively the old proposed replacement for the MM system with the preference system that did not work. Or making Chinese turning into American which dunno but sounds quite weird and not very historical either.
But granted, you were pretty vague how such a restriction would even work beyond repainting Chinese to make them look Americans I guess.

And? Still means its not historical.

Oh, we all think of PRC during the Japanese Invasion which fought a minority of the battles.

Cool, so now also Soviets in China outside Manchuria unless we implement special MM rules that is effectively adding another nation to the MM. Or repainting the Commie Chinese to Ukrainians or Mongolians?

Still not Guada. Also only/ vast majority of CW ground forces were Australian and New Zealand forces and a British tank unit is not Australian.

Sorry to say but just writing “In-depth customization rework for soldiers” and however “Campaign appropriate base uniform so we never see historically accurate occurence of Chinese and Bedouin in Normandy or Volkssturm in Africa” should work , is just nothing and has no substance, no point in debating nothing if you didn’t even bother to flesh it out.

Based on your deep suggestion of

I take this as serious advice

Why should I care about “6-million’s” definition of historical accuracy when it comes to Enlisted when the devs themselves made a definition, which was that the game only creates arsenals in campaigns according to the question if the stuff was used there or not?
And even if we say, the present is different, yes it is and devs stated several times that they do not care about regional limitation, only if the stuff and the people/ divisions faced WW2 or not.

1 Like

stop half quoting my statement to make up a bogus reply.

so what? were they not part of the British commonwealth wearing British uniform apart from few unique accessories?

most people understand what i mean, i feel sorry if you don’t.

easily fixable by adding forced uniform filter disguising them as chinese forces and vice versa when playing against germany. This way at least the weapon/vehicle isn’t so out of place

Since you seemed simple I need to boil it down for you:

  1. nothing can be done about weapon and vehicle selection, it is sealed already as part of player’s freedom to pick their own equipment.

  2. something can be done about out of place squads by forcing their cosmetics to change into another country that fought in played campaign, such as forcing liu rifle squad to wear american uniform in every campaign avaliable for allies except pacific on the account that the US literally fought almost everywhere during WW2.

  3. minor nations CAN be added without creating separate faction by dumping more and more weapon, tank, and skin into their respective parent faction. Any hare brained ideas about “b-but UK didn’t fight in X campaign” look up to point number two and one.

  4. stop adding gimmicky chile like bullshit superheavy make believe vehicles. instead add more and more cars, light tank, medium tank, and spaa from minor nations that fought in current campaigns and possibly more alongside future campaigns so people can build whatever lineup they want. If you want to play tank/plane go play WT.

  5. same as number 4 but for infantry weapons. stop adding bullshit out of place guns like liu rifle an start adding more and more indigenous weapons from minor nations that fought in current campaign and then followed with any weapons alongside campaign updates.

  6. china can be added but it should be the last on the list after other countries that can actually fit within Allies, Comintern, and Axis factions instead the first just to coincide with CNY

to reiterate, adding out of place chinese guns and war thunder tier meme vehicles while MOST of the players in this forum are asking for more Allies, Axis, and Comintern minor nation contents that actually fought in current campaign is such a dick move that is only motivated by greed and lack of spine.

Reverse psychology, huh?

you forgot about power armor

x_80b191ef

1 Like

What does it change exactly? Most if not all CW landing foces in the campaigns mentioned by you were Australians and New Zealanders. And maybe you are American or so, but they are not the English just because they speak English.

I don’t know, since when are the Australians also English?

Unit is still present and in terms of premium and event weapons you will still see their Chinese weapons in the kill feed.
But sure, the reversed Disney-race swapping is the final solution I reckon.

Dunno. Race-swapping isn’t also possible now and you still demand it.

Unit itself is still present and in terms of premium and event weapons you will still see their Chinese weapons in the kill feed. So nothing is really solved here, especially with the weapons.

Dumb because just because you commit ethnic swapping does not make the American unit suddenly British or Australian and Americans using British tanks is also not historical and if you can race-swap everything, there surely must be a genius solution from you here as well.
Everything else is just half-assed and kinda racist.

Funnny because some community people want the Maus or Jagdtiger but suddenly the devs should not listen to the people.

Why do we have them in the game anyways then?

wont-somebody-please-think-of-the-children-think-of-the-children

1 Like

i played bfv at lunch, and through it’s death.

as i have been playing enlisted since 2020,
safe to say,

this game used to be semi relaistic ( YET NOT HISTORICALLY ACCURATE SINCE DAY 1 ).
to being almost similar to bfv. it’s still an alt history.

i wouldnt’ call this an improvement, but enlisted is a bit more vaste than bfv.
at least, no stgs, german weapons or other stuff on the front lines of japan etc.
and no female soldiers on the front line yet.

but… this could change at any moment…
so never say never i’m afraid.

as it goes for this game, it’s too late to be historically accurate.
it never was, and it will never be ( outside mods ).
inspite of what the promotional material advertised it self as being one.

but… it’s 2025.
fake advertisement is everywhere.

and i don’t think the straws were just a bunch of chinese soldiers being where they shouldn’t.

it’s kinda hippocrictical of some people to watch x or Y to avoid Z omega and many other stuff.

they literally made a non existant tank an actual thing.
the ho-ri.
people joke about it. but it actually never existed.
but i digress.

as far as it goes, as long it sells, it doesn’t have to be HA.
because no HA game ever survived.

and if it did, 9/10 times it’s not HA to begin with.
because HA games are not balanced, or have much variety of equipment.

In my opinion, FPV shooter gaming peaked with this DLC.

I don’t mind this little bit of arcade aspect to the game. VG 1-5 in Moscow? Its tolerable because Germany used VG 1-5 during the war and fought in Russia. I also understand that without contents the game will surely die and DF need to have some leeway when adding contents. But adding Liu rifle used by bunch of Chinese dudes in Kuomintang uniform to Normandy and Africa when Allies and Axis member states still need more skins, weapons, vehicle, and maps is just bad decision making that deserve to be exposed.

As for Japan, DF shouldn’t insist on adding make believe tanks to counter Allied tanks. They can just simply add more fighter/bomber varieties to reflect the modern aviation industry they had.

I know 100% HA is impossible to achieve but at least let’s try to be cognizant about the game state before we release something. Let’s stop and think “do we really need to add two out of place Chinese squads before adding more appropriate contents that will fit more into the game matchmaking and setting?”

1 Like

Hmm, how do I imagine
DF reacts to our complaints? :thinking:
Listen Bitch GIFs | Tenor

1 Like

they probably gonna flag this post and delete my shit

1 Like

I’ve had a couple posts flagged and deleted, but it hasn’t stopped me from speaking my mind. DF might not feel this way, but I feel like I have spent so damn much money with them they they owe it to me to let me vent, especially while I make suggestions that they continue to ignore. :rofl:

1 Like

yea at this point even if i get flag it doesnt matter anymore tbh im just going along the ride until it stop (whenever that is)

1 Like