How does limiting auto weapons to certain classes cost the players time or monney?
Yes I would.
It’s a ww2 game so I expect bolt action rifles as a standerd.
If it would be let’s say Vietnam I would expect to have full auto wepon as a standard.
2 Likes
So just make it clear: limiting them are unnecessary because the unbalance between FG42 and semi-auto are not that intense as you think to need to be limited. But yes, FG42 is a catastrophe to those who only have BF rifles. So my suggestion is to let all players under levl 7 play together which solves 90% of balancing problem.
But I don’t think most players would. Espically when you already got nice things, nobody wants to use BF rifles again. It is easy for the frugal to become extravagant,but very difficult to reverse the process.
Still, it doesn’t explain why limiting weapons costs players monney (in your opinion).
1 Like
No, players with higher levels have spent naturally more money and time in this game. And buy Fg42 also cost real money in this microtransaction system. No one would buy it if it’s limited to gunner(which makes no sense since FG42 is a junk compared with MG34/42 and FG42 II) FG42 has no place outside end-game rifle. I prefer Breda Model 30 if FG42 is restricted.
Then it’s their fault.
The game is advertised as realistic and is about ww2. If somebody expect to have FG42 on every of his soldiers then he is ignorant. It’s his fault that he won’t get what he wanted because nobody other than himself said he will get it.
1 Like
Than refund the monney.
I know, it will hurt, but stupidity hurts.
Now excuse me, I have to eat something.
Wow that’s so insanely biased I don’t know what to say
“Weeelll the slavs get their only standout weapon at level 11 in Moscow so it’s okay to have Germany be insanely OP in every other campaign”
1 Like
Just think someday you can have goose liver for every breakfast, and suddenly you got oatmeal. Would you keeping staying in that restaurant?
LMAO so germans lost 80% in early period both in Moscow and in Berlin means OK for you. I would rather let Soviets be OP in late period to have all way easy wins in early period. Just double think.
Reported. I never insult anyone in this thread and you, I believe, just show the average moral of allies players.
EXTREMELY stupid idea. FG-42 being avaliable to everyone is fucking retarded in the first place. Giving people a MORE powerful rifle in the same way is even worse. That is not balance to give EVERY troop a full auto gun to “”"""“counter”""" a few assaulters with PPShes.
3 Likes
2 Likes
Just wonder where do you come from to view such an action as virtus. I’m really curious.
So is everyone.
Oooo, restaurant comparations, I’m in.
So imagine somebody enters a vege restaurant and want’s a well made t-bone steak. Why should he get it?
2 Likes
Bolt rifles are infinitely more satisfying to use than semi-autos and MGs.
This game gives feelings on par with RO2 just running rifleman and being the backbone of your fighting force
2 Likes
Nobody asks for a E-100 or Me262. STG44 was produced 400,000 during the war and relatively massive equipped compared with FG42, M2 carbine.
anyone want some popcorn 
1 Like